The Begining of all things - God, Creation, Angels & Man

[~PaperMoon~]

Originally Posted by Radrook

Why do they find modern human fossils in strata containing supposedly human homidid ancestors or dinosaur prints and disregard the evidence by shelving it? Is that scientific?

Example:
Giant Humans and Dinosaurs

Not to mention the evidence of advanced civilizations existing further back than 6,000 years.

[Marlbron]

Originally Posted by ~PaperMoon~

Not to mention the evidence of advanced civilizations existing further back than 6,000 years.

Man was not the first creature on earth. The angels and spirits had lived here physically before men. That is why the worldly spirit is used to refer to spirits of this world, different from the heavenly.

When Christ was fasting the devil took him up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world that he would give to him- meaning the kingdoms of this world were built up by the workings of the devils. Why then do we look far for the antichrist? The anti christ are the rulers and principalities of this world. That explains why every man of God have been beaten up and killed by the people of the world - even the son.

In these end of time the Father (The Holy Spirit) has come by himself as predicted by Christ - read john chapter 14 till end of chapter 16. The kingdoms of this world have now become the kingdom of Jehovah God and his Christ who will rule for ever and ever. This explains the current upheavals in the world today. The world is experiencing a police action, all things that do not glorify God in this world must be changed and brought to naught. More drastic things are ahead. On;ly those who live according to his ways will survive to reign with him.

[Radrook]

Not to mention the evidence of advanced civilizations existing further back than 6,000 years.

And it would be just as irresponsible and unscientific for me to simply discard or shelve that information simply because it doesn't fit my preconceptions now wouldn't it?

[~PaperMoon~]

Originally Posted by Radrook

And it would be just as irresponsible and unscientific for me to simply discard or shelve that information simply because it doesn't fit my preconceptions now wouldn't it?

True!

[Radrook]

True!

Instead, such information has to be proporly evaluated objectively and not be accepted or
rejected imediately at face value or simply because it tends to disrupt or throw a wrench into the well-oiled machinery of a popular theory.