Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2015, 05:58 PM
 
Location: DMV
10,125 posts, read 13,923,748 times
Reputation: 3222

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
True, Paul did not write James. I was making a point that "Grace Alone" and "Faith Alone" are not supported by the book of James. Yes, it was off-topic.
It depends on your context that your are referencing with Grace Alone and Faith Alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,827,979 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28 View Post
I suppose one might find the means to justify Paul's contradictory words? Surely he was not speaking for the God of LOVE, MERCY and JUSTICE..

Jesus ministered to the sinners, with no reluctance to engage adulterers, prostitutes, publicans, tax collectors, lepers, or any other “unclean” person (the whole need not a physician; a church is a hospital for sinners rather than a showcase for saints). This, of course, completely devastates the argument that god cannot be in the presence of sin by anyone who believes Jesus was god.

Paul contradicts Jesus in 1Cor 5:11: “But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.”
Paul is not contradicting Jesus, but speaking about an entirely different case: he is talking about continuing in sin after having theoretically come to Christ. I'm sure you don't mean that we should do this? If not, what is our course of action? It is outlined for us in how to approach an erring brother.

But thank you for the example of how Paul can be misunderstood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,827,979 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
You are right, that is a clear contradiction of Jesus' acts of eating with sinners, etc. Thank you for pointing that out.
See above^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:07 PM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,066,472 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
Paul is not contradicting Jesus, but speaking about an entirely different case: he is talking about continuing in sin after having theoretically come to Christ. I'm sure you don't mean that we should do this? If not, what is our course of action? It is outlined for us in how to approach an erring brother.

But thank you for the example of how Paul can be misunderstood.
But of course it would be. Because hanging out with sinners just ain't the same as hanging out with sinners..makes perfect sense to me.

How did I ever miss the difference.

Just like this --

Paul was very anti-woman. He ordered that they not be allowed to speak in the churches (1Cor 14:34-45) and that they stay home and take care of the kids (1Timothy 5:14), and that wives should be submissive to the mastery of their husbands (Ephesians 2:12; 5:22-24 and Colossians 3:18-19).

This, of course, is in direct opposition to Jesus, who elevated women — even women of lowly status such as prostitutes, Samaritans (woman by the well), and everyday women such as Mary and Martha — to a degree unprecedented for that time. Note that in Luke 10:38-42, Jesus even chastises Martha for accepting a traditional woman’s role, while he praises her sister Mary for choosing the “better part” of more active participation. This was obviously recognized by the women of that time, as Luke 8:2-3 lists the names of a number of prominent women of means who provided economic support for Jesus’ ministry.

Another situation where Paul was onto a totally different situation, right? Paul meant that just CERTAIN women should STHU and the rest of the women in the world are good to go?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:09 PM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,066,472 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
But the writings of the Pharisees never became the bulk of the New Testament. Paul's did. If Paul was a heretic, why did that occur? Clearly, early Christianity did not see Paul as a heretic.
Why Do People Follow Paul?

1. It is the easy way. Jesus requires you to actually transform your character and put it into action. Paul says, “Just have faith and believe” and you get a free gift, without ever having to actually DO anything — something for nothing; the easy way out; the lazy man’s way to salvation; the free ride.

2. As has been noted previously, Paul was wealthy, educated, and had the rare status of being both a Jew and a Roman citizen, affording him both the means and papers with which to travel. He was able to travel widely, throughout the entire Roman empire, converting gullible victims by the thousands, giving him extraordinary power, and all of them had their interpretation of what Jesus taught coming by way of Paul’s version, so it gained traction early.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:10 PM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,066,472 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by nateswift View Post
Paul is not contradicting Jesus, but speaking about an entirely different case: he is talking about continuing in sin after having theoretically come to Christ. I'm sure you don't mean that we should do this? If not, what is our course of action? It is outlined for us in how to approach an erring brother.

But thank you for the example of how Paul can be misunderstood.
SO once we come to Christ we NEVER sin again??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Southern Oregon
17,071 posts, read 10,827,979 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28 View Post
But of course it would be. Because hanging out with sinners just ain't the same as hanging out with sinners..makes perfect sense to me.

How did I ever miss the difference.

Just like this --

Paul was very anti-woman. He ordered that they not be allowed to speak in the churches (1Cor 14:34-45) and that they stay home and take care of the kids (1Timothy 5:14), and that wives should be submissive to the mastery of their husbands (Ephesians 2:12; 5:22-24 and Colossians 3:18-19).

This, of course, is in direct opposition to Jesus, who elevated women — even women of lowly status such as prostitutes, Samaritans (woman by the well), and everyday women such as Mary and Martha — to a degree unprecedented for that time. Note that in Luke 10:38-42, Jesus even chastises Martha for accepting a traditional woman’s role, while he praises her sister Mary for choosing the “better part” of more active participation. This was obviously recognized by the women of that time, as Luke 8:2-3 lists the names of a number of prominent women of means who provided economic support for Jesus’ ministry.

Another situation where Paul was onto a totally different situation, right? Paul meant that just CERTAIN women should STHU and the rest of the women in the world are good to go?
On the bolded: I don't know. Under the circumstances I'd have to say that it's because you don't want to.

You are absolutely right about that passage on women attributed to Paul, and which not only contradicts Jesus, but things that Paul himself wrote. Given the influence of Neo-Platonist thought on the developing clergy in the early part of the second century, I'm very suspicious of that passage. Good catch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 06:21 PM
 
Location: USA
18,423 posts, read 9,050,994 times
Reputation: 8462
Quote:
Originally Posted by zthatzmanz28 View Post
Why Do People Follow Paul?

1. It is the easy way. Jesus requires you to actually transform your character and put it into action. Paul says, “Just have faith and believe” and you get a free gift, without ever having to actually DO anything — something for nothing; the easy way out; the lazy man’s way to salvation; the free ride.

2. As has been noted previously, Paul was wealthy, educated, and had the rare status of being both a Jew and a Roman citizen, affording him both the means and papers with which to travel. He was able to travel widely, throughout the entire Roman empire, converting gullible victims by the thousands, giving him extraordinary power, and all of them had their interpretation of what Jesus taught coming by way of Paul’s version, so it gained traction early.
And yet Christianity made him a saint and canonized his writings into the New Testament. Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 08:05 PM
 
4,217 posts, read 2,764,593 times
Reputation: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
And yet Christianity made him a saint and canonized his writings into the New Testament. Why?
Because they do not believe in the son of man as He prescribed but believe on their own terms to their own destruction. It was much easier to follow Paul than Jesus because Jesus is hard for sinners to understand.

"No one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born from above."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2015, 08:05 PM
 
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,088 posts, read 29,066,472 times
Reputation: 7812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freak80 View Post
And yet Christianity made him a saint and canonized his writings into the New Testament. Why?
Says a lot about christianity and its willingness (need?)for idols and gods.

For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus,

even when Paul is given credit for getting it right, mere mortals still do not understand and seek to make men greater than they are so they have something to aspire to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top