Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2015, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46

Advertisements

On the 13th of December, Catholics, particularly Hispanic Catholic,s will be celebrating the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of the Americas.

The story had its beginning in1531, when Mary was supposed to have appeared to a Mexican indian, Juan Diego, and given him a tilma which contained a miraculous image of herself.

This relic on display in a Mexican cathedral, is venerated till this day.

Unfortunately some problems have developed. The image had a crown of 12 stars. But in the late 1890's this crown disappeared.

How could this have happened? Another miracle?

http://www.sancta.org/gallery/

Last edited by Aristotle's Child; 12-06-2015 at 06:57 AM.. Reason: addition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:57 AM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,189,293 times
Reputation: 32581
The feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe is December 12.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
The feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe is December 12.
You are correct. Sorry.

Do you perchance have an answer to my queston?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 09:59 AM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,189,293 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristotle's Child View Post
You are correct. Sorry.

Do you perchance have an answer to my queston?
No. Sorry. The story of the Virgin of Guadalupe is one of my favorite Catholic legends and I have several pieces of art that depict her. None of them show the crown. I attended a showing, recently, of Mexican and South/Central American art depicting the Virgin of Guadalupe. All the paintings were from the 1800's. None of them showed the crown. It doesn't matter to me. I love the story of a poor man being visited by the mother of Christ.

Her feast day is a wonderful time to visit a Catholic church in a Hispanic neighborhood. The atmosphere is joyful. A special Mass is celebrated. There are usually vendors selling flowers and food and people stream in and out of the church all day to lay flowers at the statue of the Virgin and say a prayer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
No. Sorry. The story of the Virgin of Guadalupe is one of my favorite Catholic legends and I have several pieces of art that depict her. None of them show the crown. I attended a showing, recently, of Mexican and South/Central American art depicting the Virgin of Guadalupe. All the paintings were from the 1800's. None of them showed the crown. It doesn't matter to me. I love the story of a poor man being visited by the mother of Christ.

Her feast day is a wonderful time to visit a Catholic church in a Hispanic neighborhood. The atmosphere is joyful. A special Mass is celebrated. There are usually vendors selling flowers and food and people stream in and out of the church all day to lay flowers at the statue of the Virgin and say a prayer.
RESPONSE:

Actually, the earlier images are generally no longer shown on Catholic websites. However, here is a website that shows some of the earlier ones and even dates a few of the,

Note that those after 1890 lack a crown. If you like I can research some earlier writers who have attested to the presence of Mary's crown on the tilma.

Our Lady Of Guadalupe | Picture Gallery | www.sancta.org


I obviously can't vouch for this account, but it seems to match the known facts:

http://eaglefeather.org/series/Nativ...0Guadalupe.pdf

Last edited by Aristotle's Child; 12-06-2015 at 11:16 AM.. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 02:52 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,189,293 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristotle's Child View Post

Note that those after 1890 lack a crown. If you like I can research some earlier writers who have attested to the presence of Mary's crown on the tilma.
No need. Thanks but I'm not particularly interested in whether or not the Virgin of Guadalupe has a crown. My interest in her is as a cultural icon within the Mexican-American community.

As I said.....I've seen pre-1890 paintings of the Virgin of Guadalupe that do not show a crown. If you're that interested, I suggest you search art/painting/museum sites and books. Religious sources (pro or anti) usually have a bias. Your last link certainly did.

Last edited by DewDropInn; 12-06-2015 at 03:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46
I've done quite a bit of reading regarding the Guadalupe image. (I assume you know that this legend originated in Spain in the 1300's, years before the Francisican missionaries brought it to the New World).

If you are interested in the documentable history, rather than the more popular Catholic account, you may want to consult the following references:

(1) Poole, Stafford. Our Lady of Guadalupe: The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Symbol, 1531-1797 (1995)The Reverend Stafford Poole, C.M., (born March 6, 1930)[1] is a Catholic priest and a research historian. He was formerly a professor of history at, and later served as President of, the former St. John's Seminary College . Additionally, he is known for his extensive writings about the history of the Catholic Church in Mexico and the devotion to the Virgin of Guadalupe. (see Wikipedia)

(2) D. A. Brading, Mexican Phoenix: Our Lady of Guadalupe, (Cambridge University Press, 2001,)

(3) On line you can find an extensive article on the Guadalupe history titled Historiography of the Apparition of Guadalupe by Daniel J. Castellano (2009-10)
Historiography of the Apparition of Guadalupe

(4) Fr. Guillermo Schulenburg, former abbot of the Basilica of Guadalupe, 1996 interview with the Catholic magazine Ixthus, when he said that Juan Diego was "a symbol, not a reality."

(5) Huei tlamahuiçoltica and translated as "The Great Event") is the title of a 36-page tract published in 1649 by BachelorLuis Laso de la Vega, A copy of the above is in the New Your City Public Library. On the web there is a short article on this writing including a picture of its cover. Notice the crown on the image.


“As early as 1556, Francisco de Bustamante, head of the Colony's Franciscans, delivered a sermon before the Viceroy and members of the Royal Audience. In that sermon, disparaging the holy origins of the picture and contradicting Archbishop Alonso de Montúfar's [office 1551-72] sermon of two days before, Bustamante stated: "The devotion that has been growing in a chapel dedicated to Our Lady, called of Guadalupe, in this city is greatly harmful for the natives, because it makes them believe that the image painted by Marcos the Indian is in any way miraculous."

2 Questions related to Faith & Apologetics. A Feast day & Our Lady of Guadalupe [Catholic Caucus]

There were several noteworthy elements

1. A painting not a miraculous tilma, is being described.

2. There is no mention of the mention of Juan Diego in the trial account. (That story was invented later).

3. It is not mentioned here, by the bishop had a copy of the painting made which he sent to King Phillip II of Spain. (Does it have a crown?)

4. It wasn’t until over a 100 years from the alleged miracle that the first printed account appeared titled Imagen de la Virgen Maria, Madre de Dios de Guadalupe, published in 1648 by Miguel Sanchez a priest of Mexico City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46
Default The Guadalupe Crown disappears.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
No need. Thanks but I'm not particularly interested in whether or not the Virgin of Guadalupe has a crown. My interest in her is as a cultural icon within the Mexican-American community.

As I said.....I've seen pre-1890 paintings of the Virgin of Guadalupe that do not show a crown. If you're that interested, I suggest you search art/painting/museum sites and books. Religious sources (pro or anti) usually have a bias. Your last link certainly did.
RESPONSE:

Please evidence how you determined that these paintings without a crown were pre-1890.

Historiography of the Apparition of Guadalupe - Daniel J. Castellano (2009-10)
Chapter II Guadalupe according to Luis Lasso de la Vega – Description of the Image

Lasso de la Vega's subsequent description of the image closely matches that of Sánchez. (1) From foot to crown, the image of the Virgin is six and a half spans tall. (2) Her face is noble and slightly dark. (3) Her hands are joined over the chest, from where the waist begins. (4) Her belt is mulberry (morado) in color. (5) Only her right foot is slightly uncovered. (6) Her gown (Sánchez: "tunic") is colored rose and vermilion (Sánchez: "carmine"); and embroidered with flowers in gold. (7) She has a golden brooch hanging from her neck, surrounded by black rays, and with a cross in the middle.


See: http://www.sancta.org/gallery/

Last edited by Aristotle's Child; 12-09-2015 at 07:43 AM.. Reason: additional info
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 07:43 AM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,189,293 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristotle's Child View Post
RESPONSE:

Please evidence how you determined that these paintings without a crown were pre-1890.
I didn't. They were dated by art experts.

As I said....my interest is in the Virgin of Guadalupe as a cultural icon within the Mexican-American/Chicano community. Whether or not she's wearing a disappearing crown is of little to no interest to me. Neither are anti-Catholic conspiracy theories...if that's what this is all about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Oregon
802 posts, read 454,250 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
>>I didn't. They were dated by art experts.<<

RESPONSE:

Please name a few.

>>As I said....my interest is in the Virgin of Guadalupe as a cultural icon within the Mexican-American/Chicano community. Whether or not she's wearing a disappearing crown is of little to no interest to me. Neither are anti-Catholic conspiracy theories...if that's what this is all about.
<<

RESPONSE:

If the miraculous incurruptible tilma corrupted so badly that it had to be replaced and the artist overlooked the crown, I would judge that fact to be rather significant, wouldn't you?

No conspiracy theories. Just documentable historical facts. If you dispute such, please present your evidence.

The official documents of the Spanish government have strong evidential value.

“As early as 1556, Francisco de Bustamante, head of the Colony's Franciscans, delivered a sermon before the Viceroy and members of the Royal Audience. In that sermon, disparaging the holy origins of the picture and contradicting Archbishop Alonso de Montúfar's [office 1551-72] sermon of two days before, Bustamante stated: "The devotion that has been growing in a chapel dedicated to Our Lady, called of Guadalupe, in this city is greatly harmful for the natives, because it makes them believe that the image painted by Marcos the Indian is in any way miraculous."

“The report of this 1556 inquiry is the most extensive documentation concerning the Virgin of Guadalupe from the 16th century, and significantly, it makes no mention of Juan Diego, the miraculous apparition, or any other element from the legend. But if the miracle story did have currency at that time, it seems strange that it would have been omitted from this report.”

If I recall correctly, the report notes of Bishop Montufar are a part of the record. They can be found in The Historiography of the Apparition of Guadalupe by Daniel J. Castellano (2009-10)

http://www.arcaneknowledge.org/catholic/guadalupe0.htm

Unfortunately, some Catholics' belief systems are not supported by the facts of history no matter how well documented.

Last edited by Aristotle's Child; 12-09-2015 at 09:28 AM.. Reason: quotations
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top