Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Athiest Love to ask these kinds of questions.." Can Christian Fundamentalism be credibly defended?"
when in fact we need to be making them find anything about their philosophies and self indulgences and filthy lies and fake sciences .. that in anyway brings anything good to society? they need to only defend themselves .
We have no need to defend true LIFE and Love and the only sources of it.
Paul never admitted to being a liar. And I just got through explaining to you (post #435) that what Paul wrote in 1 Cor. 9:20-23 had nothing to do with lying. I'll not bother to repeat myself.
RESPONSE:
Admission 1 “I became as one under the law (though I myself am not under the law)”
Admission 2 “To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law) so that I might win those outside the law.
I’ll (and perhaps other readers) will stick with the plain meaning of words despite your claims to the contrary.
Mike555
Quote:
And who in blazes is this ''we'' you keep referring to? You don't speak for the forum
Athiest Love to ask these kinds of questions.." Can Christian Fundamentalism be credibly defended?"
when in fact we need to be making them find anything about their philosophies and self indulgences and filthy lies and fake sciences .. that in anyway brings anything good to society? they need to only defend themselves .
We have no need to defend true LIFE and Love and the only sources of it.
RESPONSE: Are you saying you can't answer that question, or you won't?
RESPONSE:
Admission 1 “I became as one under the law (though I myself am not under the law)”
Admission 2 “To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law) so that I might win those outside the law.
I’ll (and perhaps other readers) will stick with the plain meaning of words despite your claims to the contrary.
Mike555
RESPONSE: Maybe I have a tapeworm!
Once again, this has already been explained to you in post #435. Nothing about what Paul wrote there implies a lie on his part.
Athiest Love to ask these kinds of questions.." Can Christian Fundamentalism be credibly defended?"
when in fact we need to be making them find anything about their philosophies and self indulgences and filthy lies and fake sciences .. that in anyway brings anything good to society? they need to only defend themselves .
We have no need to defend true LIFE and Love and the only sources of it.
No one has to defend themselves. I say run that freak flag up the pole and let it fly. Say what you see and nothing else.
Athiest Love to ask these kinds of questions.." Can Christian Fundamentalism be credibly defended?"
when in fact we need to be making them find anything about their philosophies and self indulgences and filthy lies and fake sciences .. that in anyway brings anything good to society? they need to only defend themselves .
We have no need to defend true LIFE and Love and the only sources of it.
So ... Christians, who suckle from the only source of love and true life, are better actors in the world than non-Christians?
That's an unsurprising claim, though. Because after all, there currently sits in the White House, a serial adulterer who stands accused by numerous women of sexually violating them, who is a self-proclaimed sexual predator, who is widely known as a shyster who defrauds vendors and contractors whenever he can, and a mob boss-like individual about as thoroughly corrupt from top to bottom as one can be ... who is where he is with the help, support and encouragement of Christians. There's also a guy who will probably manage to get elected to the Senate despite credible and numerous allegations of pedophilia, and who has been disgraced not once but twice in his role as Supreme Justice of a state supreme court -- by being thrown out by members of his own party for disobeying the law and putting himself above it -- currently this man is aided and abetted, actively and enthusiastically, by mainstream Baptist congregations all over his state.
And that's just two examples. So ... just keep doing such a great job of showing how god sanctifies his children. Just keep selling your birthright for a mess of pottage. You're doing a great job. At this rate, you may even convince some of us unbelievers that you're morally superior.
And that's just two examples. So ... just keep doing such a great job of showing how god sanctifies his children. Just keep selling your birthright for a mess of pottage. You're doing a great job. At this rate, you may even convince some of us unbelievers that you're morally superior.
Once again, this has already been explained to you in post #435. Nothing about what Paul wrote there implies a lie on his part.
RESPONSE: Given the plain meaning of words, Paul's evidence against himself is inescapable. (Unless you continue to play let's pretend). As we used to say in Latin, "Ipsedixit" (He says it himself)
His epistles admits:
Admission 1 “I became as one under the law (though I myself am not under the law)”
Admission 2 “To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law) so that I might win those outside the law.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
