Dishonesty, Ignorance, and Misleading Information within the Ranks of Biblical Creationists

[pneuma]

Originally Posted by mordant

No one is saying that a topic can't be intelligently or legitimately discussed except by people who are peer reviewed scientists. By that logic this whole thread should be shut down. I am not a scientist, I am a technologist, and in the wrong field to discuss evolution.

However I can cite peer reviewed science, and that is all that Ra is doing. Also I suspect he's far more knowledgable on the topic than anyone here, which is a bonus.

You are not citing accepted peer reviewed science. You are not even citing a minority view of science. You are citing pseudoscientific groups with a history of dishonest arguments.

I did not see him quote any peer review he just gave what he believes. Yet ID does quote peer reviewed articles and that none of you guys know that tells me you have never really read much of what ID actually believes.

And if it can be discussed without peer review why is it that is thrown in every time one of these discussions take place. So like i said when you want to use someone who has no peer review it is ok but no one else is allowed to.

[pneuma]

Originally Posted by normstad

You are once again being dishonest.

I said, clearly, his evidence comes from peer reviewed sources. What part of that did you not understand? What part do you not understand that he studied paleontology, which eminently qualifies him to discuss evolution.

You keep deflecting from facts. Why? Does your religion require you to do that?

Again we all studied math in school it does not make us all mathematicians so no ra is not eminently qualified to discuss evolution and that is according to your own statement concerning peer review.

You just want your cake and eat it to.

You simply cant stand having an even playing field you want the deck stacked in your favor in every instance as everyone reading here can easily see.

[normstad]

Originally Posted by pneuma

Again we all studied math in school it does not make us all mathematicians so no ra is not eminently qualified to discuss evolution and that is according to your own statement concerning peer review.

You just want your cake and eat it to.

You simply cant stand having an even playing field you want the deck stacked in your favor in every instance as everyone reading here can easily see.

Were you this obstinate as a child also, or did it develop later in life?