U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,115,214 times
Reputation: 1008

Advertisements

That is not biblical and i dont believe in that

There are too many cuckoos that say the spirit told them this or that.

Paul said if anyone comes preaching something DIFFERENT.

Paul was/is talking about DOCTRINE.

The bible also talks about when a person prophesies that there needs to be 2-3 witnesses.

29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
In the Berean sense, yes. But in matters of the spiritual, the only One to help discern what is meant by them, is the Spirit.
Rate this post positively

 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:36 PM
 
3,553 posts, read 4,926,042 times
Reputation: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marianinark View Post
Yep...that is what Peter said
Well, do you understand it. Paul would never say anything that went against Jesus, and if it so happens to "look" like he did, well then, it is only man's infallibility to correctly translate and discern what was meant by those letters.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:38 PM
 
Location: NW Arkansas
3,978 posts, read 8,264,028 times
Reputation: 3777
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
Well, do you understand it. Paul would never say anything that went against Jesus, and if it so happens to "look" like he did, well then, it is only man's infallibility to correctly translate and discern what was meant by those letters.

Sorry, I am afraid I am not getting your point...
I get the feeling you are insulting me...but I am not sure????
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,115,214 times
Reputation: 1008
1. The Word of God is the one that is doing the judging. If i tell someone that they're living in adultery...it's not MY RULES that say a person is living in adultery....it's the WORD OF GOD

2. Pharisees we're NOT known for following the laws. They were known for making up new laws, and not even following their own laws.

I posted the verse already that says

a spiritual man judgeth ALL things.



Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
I don't have to JUDGE them to tell the fruits. I can SEE them. Which goes all the way back to my previous post.

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

See, it doesn't work that way, otherwise all you have is a bunch of finger pointing, like the Pharisees of Jesus day. Traps, corrupt fruit, and the righteous mentality that wasn't of God, but of themselves.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,115,214 times
Reputation: 1008
Like I wrote earlier...

There's a difference between JUDGING and CONDEMNING.

You need to read the whole chapter/book to see it's being used in context.


If a Pastor is living in adultery....

Are you telling us we can't judge him?
Are you tellling us that he can continue to live in adultery because we're not allowed to judge?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
Well, do you understand it. Paul would never say anything that went against Jesus, and if it so happens to "look" like he did, well then, it is only man's infallibility to correctly translate and discern what was meant by those letters.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:51 PM
 
3,553 posts, read 4,926,042 times
Reputation: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by renriq02 View Post
That is not biblical and i dont believe in that

There are too many cuckoos that say the spirit told them this or that.

Paul said if anyone comes preaching something DIFFERENT.

Paul was/is talking about DOCTRINE.

The bible also talks about when a person prophesies that there needs to be 2-3 witnesses.

29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.
Quote:
That is not biblical and i dont believe in that
What bible you read?

"But do not be called Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers."

"But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:53 PM
 
3,553 posts, read 4,926,042 times
Reputation: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by renriq02 View Post
Like I wrote earlier...

There's a difference between JUDGING and CONDEMNING.

You need to read the whole chapter/book to see it's being used in context.


If a Pastor is living in adultery....

Are you telling us we can't judge him?
Are you tellling us that he can continue to live in adultery because we're not allowed to judge?
Only IF your robe is spotless before God. Is it?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,115,214 times
Reputation: 1008
again it's talking about CONDEMNING not JUDGING lol



Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
Only IF your robe is spotless before God. Is it?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 07:57 PM
 
Location: NW Arkansas
3,978 posts, read 8,264,028 times
Reputation: 3777
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotinAZ View Post
What bible you read?

"But do not be called Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers."

"But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said to you

The last one looks like one of the John scriptures, where Jesus is speaking to the 12 ......
Rate this post positively
 
Old 12-16-2008, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,115,214 times
Reputation: 1008
anyways to answer the main question.

NO JW can't be seen as Christians.

They're doctrine is not sound
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top