Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bob and Paul 1 Co.15 shows forth the difference between Christ and Adam, that is the whole point of those verses.
There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
Two bodies being spoken of, Adams and Christs
45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
Adam first=natural, Christ second= spiritual
47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
Adam of the earth earthy, Christ the Lord from HEAVEN (celestial body)
48As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy
Adam
: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
Christ
49And as we have borne the image of the earthy,
Adam
we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
Christ
Saying I am talking things out of contexts is always the first defence, everyone seems to use it when they disagree with the other point of view.
But it really means nothing, just that other are not willing to look into something further.
Bob and Paul 1 Co.15 shows forth the difference between Christ and Adam, that is the whole point of those verses.
There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
Two bodies being spoken of, Adams and Christs
45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
Adam first=natural, Christ second= spiritual
47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
Adam of the earth earthy, Christ the Lord from HEAVEN (celestial body)
48As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy
Adam
: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
Christ
49And as we have borne the image of the earthy,
Adam
we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
Christ
Saying I am talking things out of contexts is always the first defence, everyone seems to use it when they disagree with the other point of view.
But it really means nothing, just that other are not willing to look into something further.
So it is in the resurrection of the dead. "that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be..." Was Christ not sown a coruptible, mortal body and raised from the dead so that His body would not see corruption? "seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption." So Christ's flesh sown was corruptible and obviously mortal.
Sure God is a stand alone Spirit. Spirit is still "Being". What I said is that Satan is not A "being" which means that Satan is not a stand alone being. In other words if God doesn't exit then the Holy Spirit no longer exists, likewise if man no longer exists than Satan no longer exists.
There is no "beings" (plural) going into the swine. What is going into the swine is "being" - the different evil characteristics.
Paul
But you said the spirit being cannot stand outside of man.
So what were they doing going into swine?
I bet you don't beleive in angels (as spiritual stand alone) beings either.
So it is in the resurrection of the dead. "that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be..." Was Christ not sown a coruptible, mortal body and raised from the dead so that His body would not see corruption? "seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption." So Christ's flesh sown was corruptible and obviously mortal.
If Christ flesh was sown corruptible it SAW corruption, but as the scripture say his FLESH did NOT see CORRUPTION. Therefore His FLESH is NOT the same as ours.
If Christ flesh was sown corruptible it SAW corruption, but as the scripture say his FLESH did NOT see CORRUPTION. Therefore His FLESH is NOT the same as ours.
His flesh did not see corruption because God did not allow it to by raising Him from the dead. Was Christ's body mortal?
Bob and Paul 1 Co.15 shows forth the difference between Christ and Adam, that is the whole point of those verses.
There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
Two bodies being spoken of, Adams and Christs
45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
Adam first=natural, Christ second= spiritual
47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
Adam of the earth earthy, Christ the Lord from HEAVEN (celestial body)
48As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy
Adam
: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
Christ
49And as we have borne the image of the earthy,
Adam
we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
Christ
Saying I am talking things out of contexts is always the first defence, everyone seems to use it when they disagree with the other point of view.
But it really means nothing, just that other are not willing to look into something further.
Again, Pneuma, let's deal with the verses you already mentioned. It says ONE KIND of FLESH for men. Your still trying to smash a square peg into a round hole (still trying to claim two types of flesh for men).
I didn't just say you were taking something out of context, I showed you why it was out of context. But answer me this:
Does 1Co 15:39 show that there is only ONE kind of flesh for men?
1Co 15:39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
Do you realize Pneuma, that if you want me to believe that Jesus has another flesh then it CAN ONLY mean that Jesus didn't come as a man (since that verse says they have one kind of flesh) or that the verse is wrong. That is the only two conclusions that can be drawn if your saying that Jesus had a different flesh.
If Christ flesh was sown corruptible it SAW corruption, but as the scripture say his FLESH did NOT see CORRUPTION. Therefore His FLESH is NOT the same as ours.
Heb 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
Heb 2:18 For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.
His flesh did not see corruption because God did not allow it to by raising Him from the dead. Was Christ's body mortal?
Than explain how He was sown in corruption but did not see it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
