Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: which is more urban with more of a big city feel?
Hoboken, Union City, Guttenberg 25 49.02%
Seattle 19 37.25%
These comparisons are stupid, just like that Seattle Houston one 7 13.73%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2010, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,043,145 times
Reputation: 4047

Advertisements

Hoboken can be more urban than Seattle but I like Seattle far more.

So I voted for Seattle regardless, urbanity doesn't really matter to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2010, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia,New Jersey, NYC!
6,963 posts, read 20,534,629 times
Reputation: 2737
i thought people love seattle because of the lush green scenery mixed with the city?

hudson county, nj is neither lush nor green

well maybe palisades park
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2010, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awesome Danny View Post
Hoboken can be more urban than Seattle but I like Seattle far more.

So I voted for Seattle regardless, urbanity doesn't really matter to me.

Congrats. people often pass up all the good things about a city for stupidness like urbanity. One of my first posts in that Steattle vs Houston threads I mentioned its not how packed the city was that made me like it. In fact take away 90 percent of the people there and I would still like it

people too often judge awesome cities by nonsense on here, but could care less out in reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2010, 08:58 PM
 
1,084 posts, read 3,868,836 times
Reputation: 348
hoboken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2019, 08:17 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
It's hard to have this comparison without Jersey City, since Hoboken/Union City/Guttenberg don't have the downtown financial/office area that Seattle does. If you include Jersey City, then Hudson County takes this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2019, 06:02 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,131 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
It's hard to have this comparison without Jersey City, since Hoboken/Union City/Guttenberg don't have the downtown financial/office area that Seattle does. If you include Jersey City, then Hudson County takes this one.
Would say it should be Hudson County and parts of Bergen County such as going north from Hudson County for Fairview, Cliffside Park, Edgewater, Ridgefield, Palisades Park, Fort Lee, and Leonia. This is essentially the dense development on the peninsula of land that is between the Hudson River and Hackensack River/Newark Bay. Maybe leave out the portion of Hudson County west of the Hackensack/Newark Bay. What's on this peninsula is pretty amazing.

There should be a geographic name for that area, but I don't know what that is or if there is one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2019, 07:04 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,894,149 times
Reputation: 3263
Yeah I voted Seattle, I'd take a city over suburbs any day!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2019, 09:24 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
Congrats. people often pass up all the good things about a city for stupidness like urbanity. One of my first posts in that Steattle vs Houston threads I mentioned its not how packed the city was that made me like it. In fact take away 90 percent of the people there and I would still like it

people too often judge awesome cities by nonsense on here, but could care less out in reality.
Urbanity relates to function, economics, tourism, sustainability, and a bunch of other sectors with real-life importance.

Even if you're only counting personal preference, guess where the high-paying tech and finance jobs are going.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2019, 07:33 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
Yeah I voted Seattle, I'd take a city over suburbs any day!
Lol have you been here before? If Hudson County is suburban then everything outside of downtown Seattle is rural.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2019, 07:42 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
There should be a geographic name for that area, but I don't know what that is or if there is one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Waterfront

Also, in response to this area being a suburb:
"With a combined population of approximately 683,470 (2015 estimate) the Hudson Waterfront, if incorporated into a single city, would be the nineteenth most populous in the country with one of the smallest land areas of 35.7 square miles (92 km2). Its communities have some of the highest residential densities in the United States. Of municipalities in the United States over 50,000 people, Union City is the most densely populated.[1] Guttenberg, although one of the smallest municipalities, stretching from 68th Street to 71st Street at 128 acres (0.52 km2), is the most densely populated "town" in the country."

That 2015 estimate is way behind now, as Jersey City is growing very rapidly. So, with a population of 683,470 (which is underestimating), the Gold Coast/Hudson Waterfront would have a population density of 19,144.82/sq mi. Please, tell me again how that is "suburban." And please tell me again how Seattle is so much more urban. Seattle's density is 8,398/sq mi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top