Chicago vs. San Francisco (live, best, better, places)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Only been to Chicago, not San Fran. With that said I'm gonna say San Fran. Chicago is ok, but there are too many negatives about it...
1.) Bad Winters
2.) Seems rather dangerous
3.) Women are only average at best
Don't get me wrong, it's a cool city to come and visit for a few days. But, your best bet is to go to NYC, San Fran, San Diego, over Chicago.
With the exception of NYC, I've been to all the places you've named. Anyway, now I KNOW you're smoking dope. You've never been to SF but think it is better than Chicago??!? Your argument has no foundation...
Which one of these two cities you rather live in ?
Why do you keep posting "would you rather live in Chicago or X" threads in a Chicago forum? What kind of response do you expect to get from people who have already chosen to live here versus anywhere else?
Let's end this thread. There's already a "Chicago vs. San Francisco" thread that only ended recently...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.