Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2019, 05:11 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,900,406 times
Reputation: 3263

Advertisements

Homeowners in the U.S. hit $6 Trillion in tappable equity. In SJ the average home owner had an insane $700k in tappable equity! Metro LA had $810 Billion almost 14% of all home equity In the US. SF at $575 Billion at number 2. Californian's are sitting on 40% of the countries tappable equity. Equity is where majority of American wealth comes from it seems that some cities are extremely expensive, but the residents aren't really cashing in on it. https://www.credible.com/blog/mortga...n-home-equity/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2019, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Miami (prev. NY, Atlanta, SF, OC and San Diego)
7,411 posts, read 6,565,413 times
Reputation: 6691
And that’s why the majority of Americans do not have enough saved for retirement—how many people have at least a few million dollars in equity and/or how many are real estate investors with multiple properties with an income stream coming in??

Much more of my wealth has come from stocks which historically is a better wealth creator, is far more liquid, you can dispose a portion of your assets (try selling only 1 of your 4 bedrooms), you can make money when the market is declining, it costs far less to dispose of stocks, and they are not subject to significant upkeep and replacement costs. A smart portfolio will include stocks as well as real estate—preferably more of stocks as you will still need a place to live in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
Homeowners in the U.S. hit $6 Trillion in tappable equity. In SJ the average home owner had an insane $700k in tappable equity! Metro LA had $810 Billion almost 14% of all home equity In the US. SF at $575 Billion at number 2. Californian's are sitting on 40% of the countries tappable equity. Equity is where majority of American wealth comes from it seems that some cities are extremely expensive, but the residents aren't really cashing in on it. https://www.credible.com/blog/mortga...n-home-equity/

Last edited by elchevere; 04-06-2019 at 05:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 05:45 PM
 
724 posts, read 561,606 times
Reputation: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
Homeowners in the U.S. hit $6 Trillion in tappable equity. In SJ the average home owner had an insane $700k in tappable equity! Metro LA had $810 Billion almost 14% of all home equity In the US. SF at $575 Billion at number 2. Californian's are sitting on 40% of the countries tappable equity. Equity is where majority of American wealth comes from it seems that some cities are extremely expensive, but the residents aren't really cashing in on it. https://www.credible.com/blog/mortga...n-home-equity/
It's actually unwise to cash in on your equity though unless its to boost the home's value OR if its a rental property, to boost up the value for renters by adding more rental units or charging more to the renters that are currently there. Most people really shouldn't be using their homes as an ATM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,564,755 times
Reputation: 21249
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean1the1 View Post
Homeowners in the U.S. hit $6 Trillion in tappable equity. In SJ the average home owner had an insane $700k in tappable equity! Metro LA had $810 Billion almost 14% of all home equity In the US. SF at $575 Billion at number 2. Californian's are sitting on 40% of the countries tappable equity. Equity is where majority of American wealth comes from it seems that some cities are extremely expensive, but the residents aren't really cashing in on it. https://www.credible.com/blog/mortga...n-home-equity/
Great find.

I wonder why NY is so low?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 06:50 PM
 
14,029 posts, read 15,041,009 times
Reputation: 10476
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Great find.

I wonder why NY is so low?
Low home ownership rates. Even a lot of rich people in New York rent in Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 08:22 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,900,406 times
Reputation: 3263
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Low home ownership rates. Even a lot of rich people in New York rent in Manhattan.
NYC is close to LA in number of homes, and still half the price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2019, 08:31 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,900,406 times
Reputation: 3263
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Great find.

I wonder why NY is so low?
Density of Suburbs is my guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,116 posts, read 34,753,293 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
I wonder why NY is so low?
NY is not really low. The West Coast metros are really high due to much geographically smaller urban areas. Eastern metros aren't faced with the same land constraints.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,564,755 times
Reputation: 21249
Here's a chart from the report:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,116 posts, read 34,753,293 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubb Rubb View Post
It's actually unwise to cash in on your equity though unless its to boost the home's value OR if its a rental property, to boost up the value for renters by adding more rental units or charging more to the renters that are currently there. Most people really shouldn't be using their homes as an ATM.
To buy cars and furniture, yes. But if you had 50K in home equity to play with and threw it into an index fund in January 2017, you would have made a 13% return on your investment compared to the 4-5% you'd pay on a HELOC. A $50,000 investment, assuming a 6% rate of return with no additional contribution, would result in an ending balance of $89K after 10 years. At 7% you'd have 100K and at 8% you'd have 108K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top