Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The More Urban City (s)?
Jersey City/Hoboken 37 51.39%
San Francisco 37 51.39%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2010, 11:40 PM
 
Location: St Paul, MN - NJ's Gold Coast
5,251 posts, read 13,817,095 times
Reputation: 3178

Advertisements

SF




By xGrendelx (http://www.flickr.com/photos/xgrendelx/ - broken link)

By PatrickSmithPhotography (http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrick-smith-photography/ - broken link)

By japanjuzba (http://www.flickr.com/photos/8928219@N06/ - broken link)

By powellm79 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/powellm79/ - broken link)

By canbalci (http://www.flickr.com/photos/canbalci/ - broken link)

By Fixed Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wadegriffith/ - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2010, 12:38 AM
 
381 posts, read 862,365 times
Reputation: 215
SF - Some random street shots






A typical outer neighborhood (outside of downtown)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 06:13 PM
 
Location: San Leandro
4,576 posts, read 9,161,734 times
Reputation: 3248
my vote goes to jersey city/hoboken. It feels much more urban than sf .
Sf has more amenities, this is true but that does not really mean much. San Jose probably has more amenities than hoboken(int'l airport, sports venues, etc) but that certainly does not make it more urbane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:23 PM
 
381 posts, read 862,365 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Dude View Post
my vote goes to jersey city/hoboken. It feels much more urban than sf .
Sf has more amenities, this is true but that does not really mean much. San Jose probably has more amenities than hoboken(int'l airport, sports venues, etc) but that certainly does not make it more urbane.
NorCalDude, always hating on NorCal. San Francisco is definitely more urban than Jersey City/Hoboken, amenities aside. Ive been to both (walked around in Hoboken, drove through Jersey City), and SF is definitley more urban overall. Just do some random google streetview drops in SF and then in Jersey City/Hoboken, it should be obvious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:30 PM
 
2,881 posts, read 6,088,863 times
Reputation: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldojernkins View Post
NorCalDude, always hating on NorCal. San Francisco is definitely more urban than Jersey City/Hoboken, amenities aside. Ive been to both (walked around in Hoboken, drove through Jersey City), and SF is definitley more urban overall. Just do some random google streetview drops in SF and then in Jersey City/Hoboken, it should be obvious.
That is probably the absolute worst advice concerning urbanity anyone could follow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 07:40 PM
 
Location: San Leandro
4,576 posts, read 9,161,734 times
Reputation: 3248
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66nexus View Post
That is probably the absolute worst advice concerning urbanity anyone could follow.
Agreed. I prefer feet on the ground and eyes moving about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 08:02 PM
 
758 posts, read 1,961,743 times
Reputation: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldojernkins View Post
Just do some random google streetview drops in SF and then in Jersey City/Hoboken, it should be obvious.
You do realize the structural density is higher in Jersey City/Hoboken, right?

So if structural density is a proxy for urbanity, than a random comparison of the two would show that Jersey City/Hoboken is more urban.

Not saying this is the correct way of doing things, but there is no debate that this part of NJ has a higher structural density than SF. It's basically an extension of NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 08:04 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,921,303 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPerone201 View Post
No problem

JC/Hob


By Bgray (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nennerb/ - broken link)

By kosowskj (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackkosowsky/ - broken link)

By Tony Shi, NY-NJ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonyshi/ - broken link)

By =VTshep1= (http://www.flickr.com/photos/53185007@N00/ - broken link)

By LetMeSee (http://www.flickr.com/photos/49294679@N02/ - broken link)

By Architecture Image (http://www.flickr.com/photos/realestatephoto/ - broken link)


SF is next..

Great pics BPerone (for SF too) that first JC picture really gives a great perspective on the connectivity to NYC, for all intents and purposes it basically functions very similar to another borough and that image captures the pure girth of the dense expanse in this area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,757,657 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldojernkins View Post
The only NE city that has a bigger city feel than SF is NYC. I know Philly is technically a larger population, but it doesnt have as much of a big city feel, and has a less consistant urban fabric. Boston and DC arent quite there.
You can't really compare DC to many cities because it is a District cut out of a state. You have Rosslyn, Crystal City, Pentagon City, Clarendon, Ballston, Court House, Alexandria, Silver Spring, and Bethesda. San Fransico can't compete with all these Urban CBD's that all surround DC and most used to belong to DC. But like I said before, its not really a good comparision because DC is just a different animal. Not to mention....DC metro has over 3 times the riders of Bart. Metro daily ridership is at 1,044,000 daily riders in Q2 of 2010.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top