Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't vote because I think they are all pretty much on the same level due to the reasons I listed. None are significantly above the other. As far as the most potential; my vote goes to Houston with Atlanta behind it.
Bahahahahaha you think you know me? You don't know me or where I live, keep filling in all these places to discredit me. Again, you refused to answer my question, I will ask again; why does Atlanta have a lower median family income than Houston or Dallas?
You owe me the response, I did try to "research" it, but every time I would type in "Atlanta lower income than Dallas" all these deep southern obesity and poverty rate sites would pop up.
I don't owe you jack. And I know exactly who you are.
As to the remainder of your post, more delusional garbage. There really is no need to feel so threatened by Atlanta - really.
Anyone that claims they would never step foot on a Delta flight simply becasue they are HQ'd in the "Deep South" has serious issues. I guess since you have now recently professed such disgust with Fort Worth that you have also eliminated American Airlines too? Your choices seem to be shrinking more and more with this narrow mindedness.
Better also forego all Coke products, shopping at Home Depot, charging anything at Macy's, shipping anything with UPS, using anything made by Rubbermaid, writing with Scripto pens, donating to the American Cancer Society, dismissing everything coming out of the CDC, etc. How very sad for you.
Just curious, where are you getting your population figures from? Houston has topped 6 million people and DFW is not yet at 6.7 million. And I don't remember Atlanta's metro population being that high.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see Scarface713 already corrected you on that.
Just curious, where are you getting your population figures from? Houston has topped 6 million people and DFW is not yet at 6.7 million. And I don't remember Atlanta's metro population being that high.
Did you read the previous post? I got the numbers from DANNYY's post in another thread.
Bahahahahaha you think you know me? You don't know me or where I live, keep filling in all these places to discredit me. Again, you refused to answer my question, I will ask again; why does Atlanta have a lower median family income than Houston or Dallas?
You owe me the response, I did try to "research" it, but every time I would type in "Atlanta lower income than Dallas" all these deep southern obesity and poverty rate sites would pop up.
Houston The median income for a household in the city was $36,616, and the median income for a family was $40,443. Males had a median income of $32,084 versus $27,371 for females. The per capita income for the city was $20,101. Nineteen percent of the population and 16 percent of families were below the poverty line. Out of the total population, 26.1 percent of those under the age of 18 and 14.3 percent of those 65 and older were living below the poverty line. Houston - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Atlanta The median income for a household in the city was $47,464 and the median income for a family was $59,711. About 21.8% of the population and 17.2% of families lived below the poverty line.[121] Atlanta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dallas The median income for a household in the city was $40,147, and the median income for a family was $42,670. Male full-time workers had a median income of $32,265 versus $32,402 for female full-time workers. The per capita income for the city was $25,904. About 18.7% of families and 21.7% of the population were below the poverty line, including 33.6% of those under age 18 and 13.4% of those aged 65 or over.[119] The median price for a house was $128,200.[116]
Houston The median income for a household in the city was $36,616, and the median income for a family was $40,443. Males had a median income of $32,084 versus $27,371 for females. The per capita income for the city was $20,101. Nineteen percent of the population and 16 percent of families were below the poverty line. Out of the total population, 26.1 percent of those under the age of 18 and 14.3 percent of those 65 and older were living below the poverty line. Houston - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Atlanta The median income for a household in the city was $47,464 and the median income for a family was $59,711. About 21.8% of the population and 17.2% of families lived below the poverty line.[121] Atlanta - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dallas The median income for a household in the city was $40,147, and the median income for a family was $42,670. Male full-time workers had a median income of $32,265 versus $32,402 for female full-time workers. The per capita income for the city was $25,904. About 18.7% of families and 21.7% of the population were below the poverty line, including 33.6% of those under age 18 and 13.4% of those aged 65 or over.[119] The median price for a house was $128,200.[116]
Just curious, where are you getting your population figures from? Houston has topped 6 million people and DFW is not yet at 6.7 million. And I don't remember Atlanta's metro population being that high.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see Scarface713 already corrected you on that.
Now I'm going to ask when did Houston pass the 6 million mark according to the census? I missed that. Every link that I have seen so far says Houston has over 5.8 million in the MSA and over 5.9 in the CSA.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.