
01-28-2011, 04:38 PM
|
|
|
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,171 posts, read 15,039,649 times
Reputation: 4047
|
|
I'm just going to combine the two lists into one thread instead of making two threads out of it.
Top 10 Cities for Worst Traffic Commutes:
01. Chicago: $1,738 (70 hours/52 gallons)
02. Washington, D.C. : $1,555 (70 hours/57 gallons)
03. Los Angeles/Long Beach: $1,464 (63 hours/50 gallons)
04. Houston: $1,322 (58 hours/52 gallons)
05. Baltimore: $1,218 (50 hours/43 gallons)
06. San Francisco: $1,112 (49 hours/39 gallons)
07. Boston: $1,112 (48 hours/36 gallons)
08. Dallas/Ft. Worth: $1,077 (48 hours/38 gallons)
09. Denver: $1,057 (47 hours/38 gallons)
10. Seattle: $1,056 (44 hours/35 gallons)
Source: Traffic Pain: 10 Cities with the Worst Commutes on Shine
Top 10 Cities for Most Drunk Driving:
01. San Diego, CA
02. San Jose, CA
03. Charlotte, NC
04. Phoenix, AZ
05. Columbus, OH
06. Indianapolis, IN
07. Los Angeles, CA
08. San Francisco, CA
09. Austin, TX
10. Jacksonville, FL
Source: Top Cities for Drunk Drivers - CBS MoneyWatch.com
Any thoughts?
|

01-28-2011, 05:04 PM
|
|
|
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,509 posts, read 31,530,586 times
Reputation: 7725
|
|
holy mother of drunk driving, why are the big 4 in CA all on the list? Seriously, the recession hit that badly???
|

01-28-2011, 05:13 PM
|
|
|
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,171 posts, read 15,039,649 times
Reputation: 4047
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove
holy mother of drunk driving, why are the big 4 in CA all on the list? Seriously, the recession hit that badly???
|
No way. All the cities on the drunk driving lists are home to some of the largest public universities in the nation as well as some of the most youthful cities in the country. It makes sense seeing Austin and Los Angeles and other places on there.
Something interesting to think about, urban dwellers on this forum who love their little "no water" and "gas prices" theory can have fun defending why Chicago a supposed urban city tops the list. I am going to post on it later but gas prices in Houston are some of the cheapest in the nation, gas prices in Chicago, no not really. So an article claiming Washington DC or Chicago as most consumptive and priciest and time consuming cities for traffic. What does that say for an era where gas prices are "on the rise"?
|

01-28-2011, 05:15 PM
|
|
|
Location: Spain
1,855 posts, read 4,728,117 times
Reputation: 966
|
|
Maybe if the clubs in CA would be open til 5 AM, people would stay around to sober up instead of chugging drinks right at 2 AM last call and driving home?
|

01-28-2011, 05:28 PM
|
|
|
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,509 posts, read 31,530,586 times
Reputation: 7725
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY
No way. All the cities on the drunk driving lists are home to some of the largest public universities in the nation as well as some of the most youthful cities in the country. It makes sense seeing Austin and Los Angeles and other places on there.
|
I can understand Austin, it is not just the students that are boozers, you guys top all the national lists for drinking. But LA?? SF?? SD??? SJ??? damn, why are all the big cities in California all religiously named? Ok, don't answer that. I am sure there is a thread about California's missions somewhere out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDX_LAX
Maybe if the clubs in CA would be open til 5 AM, people would stay around to sober up instead of chugging drinks right at 2 AM last call and driving home?
|
Don't you just hate that?? Its the same thing here.
|

01-29-2011, 10:44 AM
|
|
|
4,811 posts, read 9,753,887 times
Reputation: 2785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove
I can understand Austin, it is not just the students that are boozers, you guys top all the national lists for drinking. But LA?? SF?? SD??? SJ??? damn, why are all the big cities in California all religiously named? Ok, don't answer that. I am sure there is a thread about California's missions somewhere out there.
.
|
"San" means "Saint" i.e. Saint Francisco, Saint Diego, Saint Jose. "Los" means "the". "Angeles" means "Angels".
Most California cities/towns are named in spanish because like Texas, California was once part of Mexico/Spain.
The California missions are a large part of California as well as the Gold Rush.
The first California mission was started in San Diego and worked it's way up the coast.
California Missions Foundation: Preserving our History
|

01-29-2011, 10:46 AM
|
|
|
551 posts, read 1,306,893 times
Reputation: 349
|
|
I'm surprised to see Charlotte, NC as third for drunk driving. My guess is that it's for around NASCAR race week.
Pretty funny actually.
|

01-29-2011, 10:54 AM
|
|
|
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,080 posts, read 50,343,858 times
Reputation: 15134
|
|
Interesting New York didn't make the list
|

01-29-2011, 10:57 AM
|
|
|
Location: roaming gnome
12,390 posts, read 27,346,890 times
Reputation: 5834
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY
No way. All the cities on the drunk driving lists are home to some of the largest public universities in the nation as well as some of the most youthful cities in the country. It makes sense seeing Austin and Los Angeles and other places on there.
Something interesting to think about, urban dwellers on this forum who love their little "no water" and "gas prices" theory can have fun defending why Chicago a supposed urban city tops the list. I am going to post on it later but gas prices in Houston are some of the cheapest in the nation, gas prices in Chicago, no not really. So an article claiming Washington DC or Chicago as most consumptive and priciest and time consuming cities for traffic. What does that say for an era where gas prices are "on the rise"?
|
It could be based on local gas prices, Chicago has the highest gas in the country. I'm sure the suburbs are awful. I've driven on the interstate around here a few times and it is definitely bad around rush hour.
DC and Chicago also have the 2 and 3 most used public transit in the country, but NYC has significantly higher usage so... probably why they aren't on there. I've seen gas here lately at ~3.60
|

01-29-2011, 11:07 AM
|
|
|
864 posts, read 1,049,003 times
Reputation: 355
|
|
Notice how Atlanta is not listed. Some posters/ATL bashers just lost credibility.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|