Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-13-2011, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,340,629 times
Reputation: 1450

Advertisements

The largest percentage drop in construction employment for the year occurred in Nevada (-12.9 percent, -8,400 jobs), followed by Georgia (-12.5 percent, -19,100 jobs); Wisconsin (-8.2 percent, -8,000 jobs); and Kentucky (-8.2 percent, 5,700 jobs). Florida lost the most construction jobs over the past 12 months (-24,000 jobs, -6.7 percent). Other states experiencing large overall declines in construction employment included Georgia; North Carolina (-13,900 jobs, 7.7 percent); and New York (-12,500 jobs, -4.0 percent).
Simonson noted fourteen states and the District of Columbia added construction jobs between January 2010 and January 2011. Texas added the largest number of construction jobs for the year (33,400 jobs, 5.9 percent). Other states adding large numbers of construction jobs included Michigan (8,300 jobs, 6.8 percent); Pennsylvania (7,100 jobs, 3.3 percent); and Tennessee (4,400 jobs, 4.3 percent). Maine, meanwhile, added the highest percentage of new construction jobs (8.7 percent, 2,100 jobs), Simonson noted.

http://www.agc.org/galleries/news/St...0-%20Alpha.pdf


CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYMENT DECLINES IN 36 STATES BETWEEN JANUARY 2010 AND JANUARY 2011, AND IN 20 STATES BETWEEN DECEMBER AND JANUARY | AGC - The Associated General Contractors of America

Texas created 75% of construction jobs in the nation

Last edited by Wonderful Jellal; 03-13-2011 at 07:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2011, 08:25 AM
 
26,825 posts, read 43,300,897 times
Reputation: 31439
Yes, yes one more Texas is the greatest thread...

Does no one else see the correlation between Texas boom and 8 years of Bush/Cheney?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,340,629 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Yes, yes one more Texas is the greatest thread...

Does no one else see the correlation between Texas boom and 8 years of Bush/Cheney?
No.Pro-buqiness policies are the reason, don't find ridiculous excuses Everyvody knows Texas is very pro-business, particularly businesses themselves ^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,628 posts, read 67,158,658 times
Reputation: 21164
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Yes, yes one more Texas is the greatest thread...

Does no one else see the correlation between Texas boom and 8 years of Bush/Cheney?
The recently made public budget woes in Texas are proof positive that the economic 'boom' in Texas only profits corporations. Regular folks make mediocre to low wages and state and city coffers see next to nothing which means they have to absorb the negative affects of having new companies, traffic, housing, environental issues, social programs, etc--with very little benefit for the state as a whole(except bragging rights). Its totally a one way street.

Its really an unsustainable house of cards that we already see is beginning to fall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 02:08 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,867,375 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
The recently made public budget woes in Texas are proof positive that the economic 'boom' in Texas only profits corporations. Regular folks make mediocre to low wages and state and city coffers see next to nothing which means they have to absorb the negative affects of having new companies, traffic, housing, environental issues, social programs, etc--with very little benefit for the state as a whole(except bragging rights). Its totally a one way street.

Its really an unsustainable house of cards that we already see is beginning to fall.
Yeah, the Texas Governor sucks, and his policies have begun to spiral Texas down into deep ****, tbh. We need BIG change in Texas. Our budget deficit is almost as bad as California's percentage wise. It's a good idea not to read too much into threads like this one.

And yes, Wonderful Jellal is RenaudFR. He got a name change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,340,629 times
Reputation: 1450
Haters gonna hate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 04:37 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,867,375 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderful Jellal View Post
Haters gonna hate
The uninformed gonna be uninformed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 04:53 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,686,087 times
Reputation: 7974
Well was surpised to see PA doing well on this metric too; maybe PA isnt as bad as it seems at times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,628 posts, read 67,158,658 times
Reputation: 21164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarface713 View Post
Yeah, the Texas Governor sucks, and his policies have begun to spiral Texas down into deep ****, tbh. We need BIG change in Texas. Our budget deficit is almost as bad as California's percentage wise. It's a good idea not to read too much into threads like this one.

And yes, Wonderful Jellal is RenaudFR. He got a name change.
LOL...gotcha.

I think that we need to find a happy medium between California's apparent taxing companies to death(which really isnt happening btw) and Texas' apparent informal free enterprise zone.

Corporations have learned how to hold us hostage by threatening to leave or fire people if we dont lower as closely to zero as possible what they owe to operate in our respective states and cities.

We've created a monster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 07:45 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,169 posts, read 22,583,485 times
Reputation: 17323
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Yes, yes one more Texas is the greatest thread...

Does no one else see the correlation between Texas boom and 8 years of Bush/Cheney?
George W. Bush hasn't been our president for over two years now. I fail to see how year-over-year trends between 2010 and 2011 have anything to do with a president whose last full year in office was 2008.

I guess if we can retroactively hold a president responsible for stuff that happens up to two years after he leaves office, then 9/11 and the early 2000's recession were both Bill Cilnton's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top