Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Probably the Washington DC metro, which arguably sits there right now depending upon the definition of "economy". The NYC Metro still hasn't recovered from the "crash" in terms of regaining jobs with the unemployment rate still sitting above 8%.
Probably the Washington DC metro, which arguably sits there right now depending upon the definition of "economy". The NYC Metro still hasn't recovered from the "crash" in terms of regaining jobs with the unemployment rate still sitting above 8%.
The NYC metro has a higher number of jobs than before the crash, but also higher unemployment.
But how on earth is the DC economy going to that fast in 10 years? That doesn't make any sense.
DC could be the biggest boomtown in American history, and it wouldn't have a bigger economy than NYC 10 years from now.
There is virtually no chance that NYC would have a smaller or less infuential economy than any other city in the US outside of an incredibly cataclysmic event that targets NYC exclusively.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.