Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-28-2011, 07:27 AM
 
1,378 posts, read 1,391,637 times
Reputation: 1141

Advertisements

Which areas do you prefer? "Fast growth" is an area that grows rapidly in a short period of time. "Big growth" is an area that grows slower, but has numerically more people already.

Examples of Fast growth:

DuPage County, IL
Gwinnett County, GA
Douglas County, CO

Examples of Big growth:

Santa Clara County, CA
Suffolk County, NY
Denver City/County, CO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2011, 10:25 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,906,553 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenSJC View Post
Which areas do you prefer? "Fast growth" is an area that grows rapidly in a short period of time. "Big growth" is an area that grows slower, but has numerically more people already.

Examples of Fast growth:

DuPage County, IL
Gwinnett County, GA
Douglas County, CO

Examples of Big growth:

Santa Clara County, CA
Suffolk County, NY
Denver City/County, CO

Both components need to be evaluated in tandem to get a full picture
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 10:47 AM
 
Location: a swanky suburb in my fancy pants
3,391 posts, read 8,778,237 times
Reputation: 1624
It is actually the same place but in two different stages of it's growth. You don't usually get to be big unless at some point you grew fast.

I like the fast growth period because there is always somthing new to look forward to. The only downside is that everything ends up looking the same (same architecture) Look at Las Vegas. Every house and shopping center in town is white stucco with a red tile roof. In Suffolk County every house (at one time) was a colonial or ranch with ceder shake siding with a white roof and white shutters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,297,887 times
Reputation: 13293
Fast growth stops fast too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 02:34 PM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,390,488 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenSJC View Post
Which areas do you prefer? "Fast growth" is an area that grows rapidly in a short period of time. "Big growth" is an area that grows slower, but has numerically more people already.

Examples of Fast growth:

DuPage County, IL
Gwinnett County, GA
Douglas County, CO

Examples of Big growth:

Santa Clara County, CA
Suffolk County, NY
Denver City/County, CO

I wouldn't call DuPage County "fast growth", it barely grew in the last census, Will County is probably a better example of fast growth county in Chicagoland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Southwest Suburbs
4,593 posts, read 9,194,111 times
Reputation: 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91 View Post
I wouldn't call DuPage County "fast growth", it barely grew in the last census, Will County is probably a better example of fast growth county in Chicagoland.
Right! But shouldn't this thread be about cities and not counties? Aurora went from 142,000 to 198,000(2010). Fast growth is good for cities with populations less than 250k and slow growth for cities over that. Also how big the city is in sq. miles vs. its population should be taken into account.

Last edited by Chicagoland60426; 03-28-2011 at 03:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2011, 04:37 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,154,197 times
Reputation: 14762
....or you can have both: high growth rates and high growth numbers:

Raleigh: Grew 46.3% and by over 127,000 in the 2000s decade to 403,892.
Respectively....
Wake County: Grew 43.5% and by over 273,000 in the 2000s decade to 900,993
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top