U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2011, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Piedmont, CA
36,392 posts, read 65,767,477 times
Reputation: 20760

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
So you are saying the developed space that is UA is not connected or that the imiginary NON real world line somehow makes the wall.
Furthermore, it was you who introduced the term 'real world' into the conversation insinuating that MSAs and CSAs are less relevant to reality than built up area, and that is preposterous-to say the least.

If that were true, then every major measure of wealth and population would focus on urbanized area but its almost always a metro-based stat that is listed because that's in fact, the real world as far as delineating the true size and scope of a city or region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2011, 12:54 PM
 
Location: The City
22,398 posts, read 37,861,340 times
Reputation: 7964
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Furthermore, it was you who introduced the term 'real world' into the conversation insinuating that MSAs and CSAs are less relevant to reality than built up area, and that is preposterous-to say the least.

If that were true, then every major measure of wealth and population would focus on urbanized area but its almost always a metro-based stat that is listed because that's in fact, the real world as far as delineating the true size and scope of a city or region.
You fail to see the point again. Yes things have to be placed into neat little units. It doesnt mean they appropriately account for the actual place

The original responses were that the UAs in the real world are not connected, which in the real world could not be more untrue
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 05:18 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,152 posts, read 1,252,094 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Furthermore, it was you who introduced the term 'real world' into the conversation insinuating that MSAs and CSAs are less relevant to reality than built up area, and that is preposterous-to say the least.

If that were true, then every major measure of wealth and population would focus on urbanized area but its almost always a metro-based stat that is listed because that's in fact, the real world as far as delineating the true size and scope of a city or region.
Another pretentious post consisting of nothing but arguing about wealth. I can sense a vexed attitude because SF/SJ does not rank high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:11 PM
 
430 posts, read 1,627,099 times
Reputation: 331
I dont understand why anybody "super rich" would live in NYC, yuck,

29 million bucks you can probably find a 300 sq studio made out of gold in Manhattan , no thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 07:27 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,080 posts, read 52,085,741 times
Reputation: 15163
From the link it looks the numbers are city proper numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2011, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,502 posts, read 32,232,971 times
Reputation: 7739
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
From the link it looks the numbers are city proper numbers.
This has already been debunked on the first page:

//www.city-data.com/forum/city-...uper-rich.html

Quote:
The study ranks the top ten metro areas in the United States by population of ultra high net worth (UHNW) individuals, or anyone worth at least US $30 million when accounting for shares in public and private companies, residential and investment properties, art collections, planes, cash and other investible assets.
lol, it pays to read the whole thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Piedmont, CA
36,392 posts, read 65,767,477 times
Reputation: 20760
An update to this thread not for comparative purposes but just as an FYI since its related and from the exact same source. They also released a ranking of European cities and here are the Top 10 US cities and Top 10 European cities together.

Number of Individuals worth $30 million+
New York 7,270
London 5,955
Los Angeles 4,350
San Francisco 4,230
Paris 2,820
Chicago 2,550
Washington DC 2,300
Houston 2,250
Dallas 1,855
Zurich 1,775
Munich 1,450
Geneva 1,355
Dusseldorf 1,335
Hamburg 1,310
Frankfurt 1,100
Rome 1,140
Madrid 1,060
Atlanta 960
Boston 890
Seattle 885


http://www.wealthx.com/articles/2011/london-top-european-city-for-uhnws/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 02:40 PM
 
28 posts, read 102,386 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt971x View Post
I dont understand why anybody "super rich" would live in NYC, yuck,

29 million bucks you can probably find a 300 sq studio made out of gold in Manhattan , no thanks.
You couldn't pour me into ANY of those cities, especially Chicago and New York, with their freezing winters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2011, 11:53 PM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,021 posts, read 9,426,455 times
Reputation: 5653
All the posters here that are talking about how "developed" the area between philly and NYC is, will be the same ones talking about how cities in the south and southwest "sprawl endlessly". Also, it seems to me that philly wants to be absorbed in the NYC metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,609 posts, read 15,570,484 times
Reputation: 5230
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
An update to this thread not for comparative purposes but just as an FYI since its related and from the exact same source. They also released a ranking of European cities and here are the Top 10 US cities and Top 10 European cities together.

Number of Individuals worth $30 million+
New York 7,270
London 5,955
Los Angeles 4,350
San Francisco 4,230
Paris 2,820
Chicago 2,550
Washington DC 2,300
Houston 2,250
Dallas 1,855
Zurich 1,775
Munich 1,450
Geneva 1,355
Dusseldorf 1,335
Hamburg 1,310
Frankfurt 1,100
Rome 1,140
Madrid 1,060
Atlanta 960
Boston 890
Seattle 885


http://www.wealthx.com/articles/2011/london-top-european-city-for-uhnws/
Where is Moscow? The city where by far the most billionaires in the world live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top