Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Seattle's rightful place IYO
with Philly, Atlanta, Detroit, Miami, Houston, Dallas, SF, DC, Boston 49 34.51%
with Denver, San Diego, Minneapolis 93 65.49%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2011, 07:43 PM
 
513 posts, read 577,246 times
Reputation: 759

Advertisements

Detroit, Miami, and DFW aren't even on the same level as Atlanta, Philly, Houston, SF, DC, or Boston, if anything they're a notch below. That being said I would place Seattle on about the same level as Detroit, Miami, and DFW. A notch above Denver, Minneapolis, and San Diego, but a notch below major cities like Houston, DC, Philly, Boston, and Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2011, 08:17 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,848 posts, read 21,376,619 times
Reputation: 9263
Seattle is above San Diego, Denver, Minneapolis, Miami, and Detroit
Same level as Boston, Houston, Atlanta and Dallas
Below Philly, DC and San Francisco
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,861 posts, read 15,173,601 times
Reputation: 6757
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirchBarlow View Post
Detroit, Miami, and DFW aren't even on the same level as Atlanta, Philly, Houston, SF, DC, or Boston, if anything they're a notch below. That being said I would place Seattle on about the same level as Detroit, Miami, and DFW. A notch above Denver, Minneapolis, and San Diego, but a notch below major cities like Houston, DC, Philly, Boston, and Atlanta.
Why on earth is DFW and Miami not on the same level as Atlanta? Its all dumb but if anything I would put both of those regions above Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,816,905 times
Reputation: 2501
I think it currently groups closer to MSP, DEN and SDG, but is the closest (and is the quickest to reach) the next echelon in the next 10 years or so. I see Seattle as this decade's Atlanta, Dallas or Houston (just on a slightly lesser scale).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 09:40 PM
 
Location: MN
3,971 posts, read 9,626,326 times
Reputation: 2148
It's hard to place Seattle. I guess I would break it down in a simple way like this: Population, Fortune 500, TV Market Size, Airport Traffic... San Diego, Minneapolis and Denver in Blue. Seattle in Red.

Size (metro):
Dallas: 6.4 million
Philly: 6 million
Houston: 6 million
Miami: 5.6 million
DC: 5.6 million
Atlanta: 5.3 million
Boston: 4.6 million
SF: 4.4 million
Detroit: 4.3 million
Seattle: 3.4 million
Minneapolis: 3.4 million
San Diego: 3.1 million
Denver: 2.6 million

Fortune 500:
Houston: 26
Minneapolis: 19
SF: 17
Philly: 16
DC: 16
Detroit: 16
Boston: 12
Dallas: 10
Atlanta: 10
Denver: 10
Seattle: 10
Miami: 6
San Diego: 3

Media Market by Size US rankings (TV):
Philly: #4
Dallas: #5
SF: #6
Boston: #7
DC: #8
Atlanta: #9
Houston: #10
Detroit: #11
Seattle: #12
Minneapolis: #15
Miami: #16
Denver: #17
San Diego: #28

Airport Traffic ranking:
Atlanta: #1
Dallas: #4
Denver: #5
Houston: #8
SF: #10
Miami: #14
Minneapolis: #15
Seattle: #16
Detroit: #17
Philly: #18
Boston: #19
DC: #20
San Diego: #27
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:04 PM
 
1,717 posts, read 4,629,247 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by knke0204 View Post
It's hard to place Seattle. I guess I would break it down in a simple way like this: Population, Fortune 500, TV Market Size, Airport Traffic... San Diego, Minneapolis and Denver in Blue. Seattle in Red.

Size (metro):
Dallas: 6.4 million
Philly: 6 million
Houston: 6 million
Miami: 5.6 million
DC: 5.6 million
Atlanta: 5.3 million
Boston: 4.6 million
SF: 4.4 million
Detroit: 4.3 million
Seattle: 3.4 million
Minneapolis: 3.4 million
San Diego: 3.1 million
Denver: 2.6 million

Fortune 500:
Houston: 26
Minneapolis: 19
SF: 17
Philly: 16
DC: 16
Detroit: 16
Boston: 12
Dallas: 10
Atlanta: 10
Denver: 10
Seattle: 10
Miami: 6
San Diego: 3

Media Market by Size US rankings (TV):
Philly: #4
Dallas: #5
SF: #6
Boston: #7
DC: #8
Atlanta: #9
Houston: #10
Detroit: #11
Seattle: #12
Minneapolis: #15
Miami: #16
Denver: #17
San Diego: #28

Airport Traffic ranking:
Atlanta: #1
Dallas: #4
Denver: #5
Houston: #8
SF: #10
Miami: #14
Minneapolis: #15
Seattle: #16
Detroit: #17
Philly: #18
Boston: #19
DC: #20
San Diego: #27

LOL at airport traffic. Talk about a silly measure. That's almost purely location based. Look closely at those numbers. they are useless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:49 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,665,395 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11 View Post
Another possibility

A tier with DC, Boston, Houston, SF, Philly, Dallas, Atlanta. Another tier with Miami, Detroit, Seattle, Minneapolis. A third tier for San Diego and Denver.

Must ask however, why would you place Atlanta with Seattle?

If including economy one would have to put Atlanta in that next tier below group
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:53 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,665,395 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11 View Post
I am no fan of San Diego, one of my least favorite cities but even I cannot deny its importance. San Diego is overlooked on importance because unlike Minneapolis, Denver, or Seattle its not the biggest in its region nor the most important, not even second in its state, maybe not even third depending how one were to rank Sacramento. However if San Diego were located in any other state/42 other states other than CA, TX, NY, FL, IL, PA, GA, and maybe WA it would be the clear largest and most important city in that state/region.

San Diego's economy while slightly smaller competes more closely with Denver, Minneapolis, Phoenix, and Seattle than any city below San Diego. San Diego is also one of the 20 largest metros just as Minneapolis, Phoenix, Denver, and Seattle are all in the 3/4 million limit.

PA?????????????


SD pales incoparison to Philadelphia, which I know you hate but explain which metric SD compare remotely besides weather to Philadelphia

Even for GA =, Atlanta and Miami are by far the laggards economically but explain how SD would trump either a Atlanta ot Miami

BTWI think La Jolla is just about perfect but please explain this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:59 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,665,395 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlecoming View Post
Seattle is a regional, national, and international hub. It is home to 8 Fortune-500 companies and 3 of them are in the top 100. It is economically sound because of its diverse economy with a greater opportunity for high-level wages. Size and population are not good comparisons to use because there are bigger cities than Seattle that have 1-sided unstable economies and are not world-class cities by any stretch. I like San Diego but it is not a top tier city- too over shadowed by Los Angeles.

Fair but let me put a PA region in comparison; the 4.6 million in the PA portion of the Philly MSA have a higher income and GDP per capita relative to Seatttle and more F500 cos including top 500 not to mention home to 7 US HQ of F500 corps HQ'd outside the US and the home to 3 cos that not privately owned would be F250 US corps

Seatttle is up and coming but not yet playing in the next tier on many accounts

Slyman hates Philly yet believe could not argue the economic engine of Philly and the next tier relative to Seatttle which to me I agree is an up and comer yet the next 30 yeasr will decide whether it plays in this level

It is 50% below the economic output of the next tier, EXTREMELY significant to make such a claim

Take a place like Philly add in the GDP from the next 30 miles and Seattle play 100% below...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:02 PM
 
Location: The City
22,379 posts, read 38,665,395 times
Reputation: 7974
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirchBarlow View Post
Detroit, Miami, and DFW aren't even on the same level as Atlanta, Philly, Houston, SF, DC, or Boston, if anything they're a notch below. That being said I would place Seattle on about the same level as Detroit, Miami, and DFW. A notch above Denver, Minneapolis, and San Diego, but a notch below major cities like Houston, DC, Philly, Boston, and Atlanta.

DFW plays with Houston and Philly Not Seattle by any economic output metric grow your economy by 50% then discuss per capita metrics


And this is no slight to Seattle but the scale is paltry compared to DFW; your statement is vastly ill nformed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top