Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2012, 08:45 AM
 
45 posts, read 75,280 times
Reputation: 21

Advertisements

In: NYC, Chicago, DC, LA
Possibly In: Boston, Philly, Miami
Considered: Atlanta, Houston, Dallas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:12 AM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,305,658 times
Reputation: 1330
I would say NYC, LA, Chicago definitely. Possibly DC and San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,212,805 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm02 View Post
In terms of importance, I go with GDP:

1. Tokyo
2. New York City
3. Los Angeles
4. Chicago
5. London
6. Paris
7. Osaka/Kobe
8. Mexico City
9. Philadelphia
10. São Paulo
11. Washington D.C.
12. Boston
13. Buenos Aires
14. Dallas
15. Moscow
16. Hong Kong
17. Atlanta
18. San Francisco
19. Houston
20. Miami
21. Seoul
22. Toronto
23. Detroit
24. Seattle
25. Shanghai

With 13, the US comprises just over 50% of the top 25 cities.
Nope. Houston is way too low on that list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,519,268 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm02 View Post
In terms of importance, I go with GDP:

1. Tokyo
2. New York City
3. Los Angeles
4. Chicago
5. London
6. Paris
7. Osaka/Kobe
8. Mexico City
9. Philadelphia
10. São Paulo
11. Washington D.C.
12. Boston
13. Buenos Aires
14. Dallas
15. Moscow
16. Hong Kong
17. Atlanta
18. San Francisco
19. Houston
20. Miami
21. Seoul
22. Toronto
23. Detroit
24. Seattle
25. Shanghai

With 13, the US comprises just over 50% of the top 25 cities.
That's an old MSA ranking that is at least 3-4 years old.

Here's the very latest MSA and CSA(2010) data available along with data that I researched from governmental sources all over the world:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Cambridge, MA/London, UK
3,865 posts, read 5,290,685 times
Reputation: 3367
I personally think any city that is viewed as a world leader in any category should be at least considered in the Top 25.

Is there a more impressive Higher Education Cluster in the world? Most would agree that Boston is the leader; Also no city has a more powerful Medical Research cluster either and we are not only talking America we are talking Globally. How can you excel in two important categories and not be considered a World City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:27 AM
 
45 posts, read 75,280 times
Reputation: 21
1) Because those are only two categories;
2) Because those two categories are not as important and influential as you think.

HTH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,949,941 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by 75 South View Post

Oddly enough, five US cities made their study. I only agree with 3 of them

The World's 26 Best Cities for Business, Life, and Innovation - Derek Thompson - Business - The Atlantic
Well the list says 5 successful cities.

I think there are a hundred successful cities in the US most of which could make the list.

The 5 cities that made the list ARE successful and there are others that could easily make it (Boston, ATL, Seattle, DC, Miami, Philly, etc).

NY, SF, Chicago, Houston and LA are some of our biggest cities. They all have GDPs bigger than many countries. SF is a beacon of culture for the world. Chicago development is a blueprint for many cities to follow. Houston Energy industry, fastest growing city last decade and current success in weathering the economic storm well warrants addition to the list. Finally LA is our second biggest city, it is a champion around the world in Industry, shipping, manufacturing, and Entertainment.

I say there is nothing to disagree with. I would add more US cities rather than remove any that were added. Heck if this was an all time list and didn't take current situation into account, I would not bat an eyelash if cities like Detroit, New Orleans, Cleveland, Baltimore, St louis and others were added.

Our Cities have achieved a lot even though we like to look down on them, they have made their mark on the world
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:43 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,560 posts, read 28,659,961 times
Reputation: 25153
Definitely top 25:

New York City
Los Angeles
Washington DC
Chicago
San Francisco

Strong case for top 25:

Boston
Houston
Philadelphia
Dallas
Atlanta
Miami
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Center City
7,528 posts, read 10,258,471 times
Reputation: 11023
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
That's an old MSA ranking that is at least 3-4 years old.

Here's the very latest MSA and CSA(2010) data available along with data that I researched from governmental sources all over the world:
Prior rankings in my earlier post in this thread were for city only, which btw, is what this tread is about. The rankings for US metros provided in your post, however, do not match the Sept., 2011 release from the US Department of Commerce (News Release: GDP by Metropolitan Area, Advance 2010, and Revised 2007–2009):

1. NYC ($1,280B)
2. LA ($726B)
3. Chicago ($532B)
4. DC ($425B)
5. Houston ($394B)
6. DFW ($374B)
7. Philadelphia ($346B)
8. SF ($325B)
9. Boston ($313B)
10. Atlanta ($272B)

While your data provides a set of "estimates," given your sources vary, the exact accuracy is quetionable. I suspect you will not agree, so to head off debate, I have no issue if the data sources and parameters you used to derive them help you prove a point that is important to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 10:49 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,054,732 times
Reputation: 11862
^ I agree with the above. Those 5 should be in the top 25.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top