Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2014, 09:14 PM
 
2,770 posts, read 2,602,221 times
Reputation: 3048

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MilehiDenver View Post
Again, Denver has been well over 3 million for many years! Geesh!
No it hasn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MilehiDenver View Post
Was it ever pointed out if the op meant MSA or CSMA?
Did you read the OP?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2014, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,679 posts, read 9,380,908 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by MilehiDenver View Post
Again, Denver has been well over 3 million for many years! Geesh! Was it ever pointed out if the op meant MSA or CSMA? Either way, Denver is one of the fastest growing metros in the US for the last decade and is not slowing down!

Denver-Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


3.2 million almost 2 years ago!
No it hasn't. Just because you keep repeating it does not make it true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 02:22 AM
 
437 posts, read 628,655 times
Reputation: 287
Quote:
Originally Posted by MilehiDenver View Post
Again, Denver has been well over 3 million for many years! Geesh! Was it ever pointed out if the op meant MSA or CSMA? Either way, Denver is one of the fastest growing metros in the US for the last decade and is not slowing down!

Denver-Aurora, CO Combined Statistical Area - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


3.2 million almost 2 years ago!
This is what the OP wrote:

Quote:
Which will be the next metro areas to join the "3 million club"? Obvious contenders include Tampa Bay (currently at 2,860,379), St. Louis (2,812,896), and Baltimore (2,710,489). It's important to note that each has a different rate of population growth, which will certainly affect the outcome. Then let's not forget those slightly smaller MSAs with some rather robust rates of population growth: Denver, Portland, Sacramento, San Antonio, Orlando. It's entirely possible that any of these metros could eventually catch up with, or surpass, those ranked above them.
So like everyone else has already said Denver still hasn't hit the 3 mil mark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 02:55 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Denver and Salt Lake City both feel much larger than just their MSAs because the surrounding MSAs all revolve around them like planets around a star, emphasized even more by the fact that their greater agglomerations are isolated once you leave their areas of influence.

Much like LA and SF, only on a much smaller scale(for now at least)

Salt Lake to me is over 100+ miles north to south from North of Ogden all the way down to oh Payson or so. That's huge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 06:12 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
The big unknown is whether or not MSAs are redefined in the future. MSAs can be split into two, they can be expanded, they can trade counties with their CSAs, they can be combined, etc. Fast growing metro areas (of any sort) will likely have the most changes to their official boundaries and designations over time. This is truly a wild card.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,695,817 times
Reputation: 5872
If they would redefine the Denver MSA and include Boulder (which the definitely should have already done) then Denver would already be 3 million (I believe).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 10:16 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
If they would redefine the Denver MSA and include Boulder (which the definitely should have already done) then Denver would already be 3 million (I believe).
I wouldn't hold your breath. There are a lot of decisions made around MSAs that don't make sense to people in local metro areas. Local input and guidance are not taken into consideration. They only base their decisions on national metrics that they establish based on what they deem appropriate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 10:27 PM
 
2,770 posts, read 2,602,221 times
Reputation: 3048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
If they would redefine the Denver MSA and include Boulder (which the definitely should have already done)
Is Denver the only one "they" should redefine?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 02:58 AM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
1,424 posts, read 1,936,877 times
Reputation: 2818
Tampa and Denver are already there-more like low to mid-3's in each. The designation of their metro areas should absolutely include surrounding cities- anyone that's spent time in either place knows that Boulder/Longmont is part of the Denver Area, and that Bradenton/Sarasota or Plant City/Lakeland could easily be classified in the Tampa Bay Region. There's no open space between any of them-and a huge number of people that commute into work. Of course, indicators like Designated Market Areas do take peripheral areas into account, and both Tampa and Denver tend to do better on those lists. I personally think media market size puts things in perspective..... refhttp://www.tvb.org/media/file/TVB_Market_Profiles_Nielsen_TVHH_DMA_Ranks_2013-2014.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2014, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Paris
1,773 posts, read 2,673,833 times
Reputation: 1109
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartonizer View Post
Tampa and Denver are already there-more like low to mid-3's in each. The designation of their metro areas should absolutely include surrounding cities- anyone that's spent time in either place knows that Boulder/Longmont is part of the Denver Area, and that Bradenton/Sarasota or Plant City/Lakeland could easily be classified in the Tampa Bay Region. There's no open space between any of them-and a huge number of people that commute into work. Of course, indicators like Designated Market Areas do take peripheral areas into account, and both Tampa and Denver tend to do better on those lists. I personally think media market size puts things in perspective..... refhttp://www.tvb.org/media/file/TVB_Market_Profiles_Nielsen_TVHH_DMA_Ranks_2013-2014.pdf
Well that took no time at all to restart...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top