U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-15-2012, 04:14 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,973 posts, read 24,255,481 times
Reputation: 12106

Advertisements

I was looking over the Combined Statistical Area growth rates for these 3 cities and noticed that Louisville is growing at 1.2% per year while Cincinnati is only growing 0.6% per year and Pittsburgh's metro has lost 500,000 people since 1960.

IF these growth rate trends continue Louisville's greater Metro Area (or Combined Statistical Area) would overtake Cincinnati's by the year 2070. Of course that's a long ways off.

Do you think these trends will continue and Louisville will become the preeminent Ohio River city?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2012, 04:19 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 25,117,875 times
Reputation: 11321
We'll all be dead by 2070.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2012, 04:34 PM
 
1,189 posts, read 2,104,698 times
Reputation: 1003
Louisville would take decades to grow larger than cincinnati and even then it would not be nearly as important than cincinnati in influence, business, economics, demographics etc.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2012, 05:11 PM
 
2,492 posts, read 4,269,104 times
Reputation: 1415
In a word: No.

It's a long, long time til 2070 ... who knows what'll happen to shift things by then? Chances are most of us won't be around to find out.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Englewood, Near Eastside Indy
8,806 posts, read 16,302,728 times
Reputation: 6974
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
I was looking over the Combined Statistical Area growth rates for these 3 cities and noticed that Louisville is growing at 1.2% per year while Cincinnati is only growing 0.6% per year and Pittsburgh's metro has lost 500,000 people since 1960.

IF these growth rate trends continue Louisville's greater Metro Area (or Combined Statistical Area) would overtake Cincinnati's by the year 2070. Of course that's a long ways off.

Do you think these trends will continue and Louisville will become the preeminent Ohio River city?
Cincinnati's metro will probably meld with Dayton's before 2070, and Louisville will have to wait another century to catch up.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2012, 05:47 PM
 
37,250 posts, read 38,189,958 times
Reputation: 25994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
We'll all be dead by 2070.
Speak for yourself, LOL. I wouldn't mind living to see 90 if I'm in decent health.

To answer the question, it's not very likely.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2012, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati (Norwood)
3,530 posts, read 4,728,620 times
Reputation: 1914
Absolutely not--the overwhelming reality of "Cin-Day" is very near, not in 2070. (Think 3.2 million MSA)

Last edited by motorman; 06-15-2012 at 06:52 PM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 05:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago(Northside)
3,719 posts, read 6,907,822 times
Reputation: 1692
Sow hen are those people ever going to group cincinnati with dayton?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,329 posts, read 8,631,429 times
Reputation: 4028
No, the Pittsburgh MSA has stopped losing population and now does a good job at attracting migrants compared to other cities in the Northeast and the Cincinnati metro is gaining people too.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 06:24 PM
 
865 posts, read 1,400,403 times
Reputation: 315
No way. From what I have seen Pittsburgh is back on the upswing. Also, Cincinnati's metro never stopped gaining population and Cincinnati's economy has been doing very well lately(as has Ohio's: Ohio created more than a quarter of U.S. jobs in May | cleveland.com). I think the metro growth rate will increase and the city population will start posting increases again. Unless something major happens, I don't see Louisville catching up.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top