Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2012, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,996,717 times
Reputation: 5766

Advertisements

The thing about Septa is that though it is one of the top transit systems in the country, it is far from reaching it's full potential. Septa should have a much higher ridership for a city of its size. With as much rail options as Septa has, it should be blowing out every city in the country in terms of ridership except for Chicago and New York City. Septa could easily boost ridership numbers if it were able to extend commuter rail lines into places like West Chester, Reading and Allentown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2012, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
The opening post asks which is best, which is worst. With two choices I say SEPTA is worse. The state never properly funds it compared to Boston. There are dirty stations that smell of urine on SEPTA, never encountered that on the T.
They don't smell like ****, but it's a pretty big stretch to say T stations are well maintained too. Not the worst I've seen but far from the best.

Here are the ridership numbers: http://www.apta.com/resources/statis...rship-APTA.pdf

Last edited by munchitup; 08-30-2012 at 05:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2012, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
1,567 posts, read 3,116,430 times
Reputation: 1664
SEPTA's main problem is all the people with huge butts taking up two seats on crowded buses and trolleys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2012, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Montco PA
2,214 posts, read 5,093,205 times
Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
The thing about Septa is that though it is one of the top transit systems in the country, it is far from reaching it's full potential. Septa should have a much higher ridership for a city of its size. With as much rail options as Septa has, it should be blowing out every city in the country in terms of ridership except for Chicago and New York City. Septa could easily boost ridership numbers if it were able to extend commuter rail lines into places like West Chester, Reading and Allentown.
Getting off-topic but I think we will see the restoration of some of these lines (especially Reading or at least Pottstown, Quakertown, and Newtown) in the upcoming years. I think there's no other choice. SEPTA definitely can make significant strides toward re-achieving the sheer massiveness and scope its predecessor's (The Pennsylvania RR and the Reading RR) had. However, until then, we can only hope our politicians become more interested in improving our US infrastructure as opposed to fighting in unpopular wars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 12:57 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,924,830 times
Reputation: 5895
The T does a much better job of covering the city of Boston. The two dinky little lines in a city of 1.5M in Philly do a pathetic job. Do you people realise that 500,000 people in NE Philadelphia have to ride two to three buses to get to the blue line. Seriously? SEPTA never bothered to expand rapid transit to that huge densely populated area. They still don't have any plans to provide rapid transit there. How bout East Falls, Manayunk and Roxborough? That whole section of the city has no rapid transit and has to rely on commuter rail. Would Boston or NYC or DC leave out such large portions of their city? I doubt it.

SEPTA is all buses with two small subway lines. Hardly world class transit. Meanwhile most other cities are expanding their rapid transit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 01:03 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,694,435 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
The T does a much better job of covering the city of Boston. The two dinky little lines in a city of 1.5M in Philly do a pathetic job. Do you people realise that 500,000 people in NE Philadelphia have to ride two to three buses to get to the blue line. Seriously? SEPTA never bothered to expand rapid transit to that huge densely populated area. They still don't have any plans to provide rapid transit there. How bout East Falls, Manayunk and Roxborough? That whole section of the city has no rapid transit and has to rely on commuter rail. Would Boston or NYC or DC leave out such large portions of their city? I doubt it.

SEPTA is all buses with two small subway lines. Hardly world class transit. Meanwhile most other cities are expanding their rapid transit.
Lol wow you are a true Philly basher who does not know what he is talking about do you?

The Northeast has little transit options because of how car oriented it is... have you ever been to the Northeast?! Also, there are plans for a light rail or subway line that will run along Roosevelt Blvd and connect with the Broad Street line.

Also, Manayunk, East Falls and Roxborough are serviced by the Norristown Line that will get you to Center City in 15 minutes... pretty impressive since that is quicker than you can get there via car.

Seriously... just stop making yourself look bad. I have proved you wrong on every comment you have made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 01:37 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,924,830 times
Reputation: 5895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
Lol wow you are a true Philly basher who does not know what he is talking about do you?

The Northeast has little transit options because of how car oriented it is... have you ever been to the Northeast?! Also, there are plans for a light rail or subway line that will run along Roosevelt Blvd and connect with the Broad Street line.

Also, Manayunk, East Falls and Roxborough are serviced by the Norristown Line that will get you to Center City in 15 minutes... pretty impressive since that is quicker than you can get there via car.

Seriously... just stop making yourself look bad. I have proved you wrong on every comment you have made.

The Norristown commuter rail line? Runs every half hour at rush hour and every hour after that. Hardly rapid transit. Hell will freeze over before any light rail line is built along the Blvd. Keep drinking Philly cool-aid. When is the construction start date for the light rail line to the NE?

The NE car oriented? No more or less than any other parts of the city. Yes I've been there. Row house upon row house neighborhood no diff than Boston or DC. It is very densely populated and should have rapid transit options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 01:44 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,694,435 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
The Norristown commuter rail line? Runs every half hour at rush hour and every hour after that. Hardly rapid transit. Hell will freeze over before any light rail line is built along the Blvd. Keep drinking Philly cool-aid. When is the construction start date for the light rail line to the NE?

The NE car oriented? No more or less than any other parts of the city. Yes I've been there. Row house upon row house neighborhood no diff than Boston or DC. It is very densely populated and should have rapid transit options.
Clearly you didn't see the driveway in front of every house and the suburban style big box department stores with surface parking lots out front all throughout the Northeast.

Why do you need rapid transit to the Northwest sections of the city more often than 30 minutes? Is that even Necessary?

Lastly, I guarantee the Roosevelt Blvd subway or light rail line breaks ground within 10 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
1,436 posts, read 1,882,355 times
Reputation: 1631
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
The T does a much better job of covering the city of Boston. The two dinky little lines in a city of 1.5M in Philly do a pathetic job. Do you people realise that 500,000 people in NE Philadelphia have to ride two to three buses to get to the blue line. Seriously? SEPTA never bothered to expand rapid transit to that huge densely populated area. They still don't have any plans to provide rapid transit there. How bout East Falls, Manayunk and Roxborough? That whole section of the city has no rapid transit and has to rely on commuter rail. Would Boston or NYC or DC leave out such large portions of their city? I doubt it.

SEPTA is all buses with two small subway lines. Hardly world class transit. Meanwhile most other cities are expanding their rapid transit.
Your not considering the 8 light rail lines, or 13 commuter rail lines which do an excellent job.

There are plans to build in the Northeast. Several plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2012, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
1,436 posts, read 1,882,355 times
Reputation: 1631
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
The Norristown commuter rail line? Runs every half hour at rush hour and every hour after that. Hardly rapid transit. Hell will freeze over before any light rail line is built along the Blvd. Keep drinking Philly cool-aid. When is the construction start date for the light rail line to the NE?

The NE car oriented? No more or less than any other parts of the city. Yes I've been there. Row house upon row house neighborhood no diff than Boston or DC. It is very densely populated and should have rapid transit options.
Row house upon row house has nothing to do whether the people who live in those homes own cars......

The Norristown Highspeed line would be considered a rapid transit line.

It uses third rail, is grade seperated, has high platforms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top