Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They both do different things well. LV though to me is too small and casino centric. It lacks in more diverse entertainment offerings and maybe is too polished for th tourist in general. I will go with LA. But this dog fight is really between LA and NYC not LA and LV
Los Angeles lol...it's much nicer and much larger....not many people actually desire to even live in Las Vegas. Hollywood is probably the most known entertainment district in the world as that's where many blockbuster films were filmed and produced at.
They both do different things well. LV though to me is too small and casino centric. It lacks in more diverse entertainment offerings and maybe is too polished for th tourist in general. I will go with LA. But this dog fight is really between LA and NYC not LA and LV
New York
London
Los Angeles/Tokyo/Seoul/Paris
............
...........
...........
............
...........
...........
...........
...........
Las Vegas
L.A
Vegas is entertainment for tourist who go there, the city doesn't entertain the world
And NYC isn't even close to L.A and I don't understand why some people would think NYC is first.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.