U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Pittsburgh vs. Kansas City
Pittsburgh 45 61.64%
Kansas City 28 38.36%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,084 posts, read 10,392,516 times
Reputation: 5872

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
Pittsburgh has much more to offer and is in a much better location.
Based on what exactly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Floyd County, IN
26,050 posts, read 45,032,960 times
Reputation: 18964
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrix542 View Post
Kansas City. It has a lot of fast growing suburbs, its much warmer than Pittsburg and its more affordable.
A city by city comparison would find Pittsburgh well on top. I didn't think this was a suburb vs suburb thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Floyd County, IN
26,050 posts, read 45,032,960 times
Reputation: 18964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Based on what exactly?
Pittsburgh is much more conveniently located to the Northeast Megalopolis and also to the Great Lakes cities. Kansas City is not close to any large city other than St. Louis. The other larger cities are further drive away, generally over 8 hours. Some people don't like flying all the time to get somewhere so that could be a factor to consider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
669 posts, read 884,386 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
You should probably mention something about what you are personally looking for.
But I didn't start this thread for advice on what's best for me. I asked which other people think is the better city between the two.

But since you asked which do people think is more appealing to younger demographics?

Last edited by yyuusr; 04-19-2013 at 01:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
669 posts, read 884,386 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
A city by city comparison would find Pittsburgh well on top. I didn't think this was a suburb vs suburb thread?
Well it can be about the suburbs but within the cities only not individual small cities in the metro area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
So, again, KC is a nice city and I don't think 99% of the country knows how much KC does offer (KC is just not seen as a large urban city due to its association with Kansas which is too bad because it is so much more than most people know), but Pittsburgh is more my style.
Yeah that's pretty much what's stopping me from saying Kansas City sounds like a better city. How much Kansas influence is there in Kansas City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 02:16 PM
 
2,234 posts, read 3,046,247 times
Reputation: 2056
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyuusr View Post
How much Kansas influence is there in Kansas City?
No more than "Pensyssippi" influence in Pittsburgh.

I think its more a question of reputation. Kansas City, in large part because of its name, often has the perception of being a dusty little cowtown on the prairie. Pittsburgh has a reputation of being a gray, dead rustbelt shell with empty smokestacks and crumbling row houses. Neither one of which is true, and anyone who has been to either one usually knows it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 02:31 PM
 
2,492 posts, read 4,364,829 times
Reputation: 1415
Pittsburgh - It's more interesting and is in a far more desirable location. KC's not bad though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 03:03 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,097 posts, read 23,268,146 times
Reputation: 6354
Quote:
Originally Posted by yyuusr View Post
Yeah that's pretty much what's stopping me from saying Kansas City sounds like a better city. How much Kansas influence is there in Kansas City?
While Kansas City, MO (and even the state of Kansas) is pretty much nothing like the stereotypes that Kansas would lead people to believe, the state of Kansas has quite a bit of influence over the city of Kansas City, MO and the entire metro. I would say possibly even more than the state of MO and Jeff City.

KC is all but ignored by Jeff City and treated like collateral damage. The state would rather KCMO take a beating from Kansas than help it out because doing so would risk creating even more problems in the St Louis area which does not have near the same problems with Illinois and has an economy over twice the size of the Missouri side of KC they want to protect first.

The state line in KC is what keeps the city from competing. It's too busy competing within its own metro to even think about competing with other major metros. The place acts like four small metros that fiercely compete in their own little isolated world and suburban development and sprawl there is subsidized and supported at a level I have never seen anyplace else, especially when most of it comes at the expense of thier own core cities of KCMO and KCK and inner ring suburbs (not new eco activity from denver or dallas etc).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, Canada
3,721 posts, read 5,177,552 times
Reputation: 1180
pittsburg is loved on city data, not so much in real life
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: In the heights
36,189 posts, read 37,004,333 times
Reputation: 20285
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrix542 View Post
pittsburg is loved on city data, not so much in real life
How so? The population is recovering, housing prices are up, and transplants are settling there. A lot of major companies, especially in tech, have set up regional offices there. It gets love in a lot of publications, too. And c'mon, it was Mister Rogers' neighborhood, you can't **** on Mister Rogers' neighborhood. The guy was so friendly to everyone and he was an ex-marine who could break your face in half.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top