Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2013, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,139,756 times
Reputation: 5860

Advertisements

What? Flour mills? Lol.

Willamette Falls are not in Portland. They're in Oregon City.

And Portland ... it was named for the city in Maine, not for the fact that there was a port. But the port was important. Portland was established because it was the furthest tall ships could sail up the Willamette. Where they could ship lumber (mostly) out.

Nice try. But a huge fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2013, 11:49 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,435,785 times
Reputation: 35863
Well it looks like there was a flour mill in East Portland in the town of Brooklyn in the 1870's but at the time, it wasn't even a part of Portland but was one of the many parcels or land that was eventually annexed to Portland and eventually became part of it. Today Brooklyn is a neighborhood in Portland.

Flour mills were not a main industry in Portland as far as I could see when I looked it up. That was more along the lines of Washington State territory along the Columbia.

Oregon History Project
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 04:51 AM
 
14,012 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10465
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
What? Flour mills? Lol.

Willamette Falls are not in Portland. They're in Oregon City.

And Portland ... it was named for the city in Maine, not for the fact that there was a port. But the port was important. Portland was established because it was the furthest tall ships could sail up the Willamette. Where they could ship lumber (mostly) out.

Nice try. But a huge fail.
By the time Portland consolidated the whole city only had 120,000 or so, so any History before that regarding niegborhood layouts etc. Were made irrelevant when an additional 550,000 people that moved there.

The Divisions in Providence (and surronding cities) happened when Providence and Rhode Island pretty much had the same population it has today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,139,756 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minervah View Post
Well it looks like there was a flour mill in East Portland in the town of Brooklyn in the 1870's but at the time, it wasn't even a part of Portland but was one of the many parcels or land that was eventually annexed to Portland and eventually became part of it. Today Brooklyn is a neighborhood in Portland.

Flour mills were not a main industry in Portland as far as I could see when I looked it up. That was more along the lines of Washington State territory along the Columbia.

Oregon History Project
I'm guessing he's getting his info from Wikipedia, or something similar. But I'm guessing Wikipedia because it mentions both wheat exports and Willamette Falls.

Today, wheat is a major export from the Port of Portland ... coming in from eastern Oregon, where it's grown. Really has nothing to do with Portland, or it's growth. And certainly nothing to do with "flour mills."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,139,756 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
By the time Portland consolidated the whole city only had 120,000 or so, so any History before that regarding niegborhood layouts etc. Were made irrelevant when an additional 550,000 people that moved there.

The Divisions in Providence (and surronding cities) happened when Providence and Rhode Island pretty much had the same population it has today.
Actually, when Portland took in all the surrounding towns, the population was only about 50,000.

Where do you get your "facts"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Lakewood OH
21,695 posts, read 28,435,785 times
Reputation: 35863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico View Post
I'm guessing he's getting his info from Wikipedia, or something similar. But I'm guessing Wikipedia because it mentions both wheat exports and Willamette Falls.

Today, wheat is a major export from the Port of Portland ... coming in from eastern Oregon, where it's grown. Really has nothing to do with Portland, or it's growth. And certainly nothing to do with "flour mills."
I think so too. He certainly can't be looking at any of the Portland historial websites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2013, 03:51 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,745 posts, read 23,801,634 times
Reputation: 14655
Spokane was the flour mill city just for the record...
Spokane Historical | Flour Mill

Carry on....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2013, 04:55 AM
 
14,012 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10465
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
Actually, when Portland took in all the surrounding towns, the population was only about 50,000.

Where do you get your "facts"?
The city has 50,000 in 1890, it annexed several towns in 1891, after the census, meaning the ciy population would go up, in 1900, Portland had over 120,000 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,139,756 times
Reputation: 5860
In 1892, the mayor of Portland stated the population of the consolidated city as 80,000.

At the 1900 US census, the population was 90,000.

What spurred the major growth spurt was the Lewis & Clark Exposition, which was held in 1904. The next census (1910) the population had more than doubled that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top