Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're not right about anything (nice try) and I'm starting to think you and caesarshtl are the same 12 yr old imposter.
Together you and TitanRam are the most clueless posters I've seen on the Internet. Here's BOTH KC and STL urban cores, which city looks larger and better to you?
You're not right about anything (nice try) and I'm starting to think you and caesarshtl are the same 12 yr old imposter.
Together you and TitanRam are the most clueless posters I've seen on the Internet. Here's BOTH KC and STL urban cores, which city looks larger and better to you?
How St. Louis's skyline is all the way in the back and angle of the photo is closer to the ground though...
The distance is very close (about 45 blocks) and the height of the camera is about 700 ft high.
The KC photo doesn't even show the Plaza as the helicopter is almost above it or else KC would look even larger. KC's downtown is larger.
KC has the best art scene in the midwest and most other cities for a reason.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Merill
You can't even quote me correctly; I never claimed said "KC has the best arts scene in the midwest."
Your credibility is now completely lost. Here's what I said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Merill
You're not right about anything (nice try) and I'm starting to think you and caesarshtl are the same 12 yr old imposter.
Together you and TitanRam are the most clueless posters I've seen on the Internet.
You get straight up nailed in another one of your lies, with quoted evidence (where you even attacked the other poster for asking you about this), and your response is to attack the integrity of others??? This is just pathetic and embarrassing... Keep reposting those pics from poster KCMO though, of course you're still just using the ones that only show part of the St. Louis core and complaining when he shows all of it...
Sorry, but that's a fugly city, not a single handsome building in the entire photo.
And the camera angle is friendly, the reality is that first photo is 10 miles long all the way out to Clayton and has huge gaps of wasteland where there's almost nothing but vacant lots that you can't see because of the angle. You should stick to showing U Loop and Clayton - easily the best part of STL.
Last edited by Gene Merill; 04-13-2016 at 10:21 PM..
Kansas City has a larger more beautiful core. KC's architecture is more diverse.
The steep hills, boulevards and hundreds of fountains are simply more aesthetically beautiful.
KC's core is simply larger, more intact and more beautiful than STL IMO.
My comment was about the built environment of the downtown cores of each city.
Both cities have the same population within a 10 mile circle from their downtown center. The original city of KCMO was only 69 sq miles prior to massive annexation in the 70s and is very urban throughout the original city limits. (MO river south to 75th st and State Line to I-435). http://goo.gl/tzfI9F
Last edited by Gene Merill; 04-13-2016 at 11:08 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
