Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Where would you rather live?
Toronto, ON (Canada) 69 48.94%
New York, NY (USA) 72 51.06%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:20 PM
 
Location: USA (dying to live in Canada)
1,028 posts, read 1,881,019 times
Reputation: 412

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by destinedtodave View Post
Moving for the metric system? ...giggle...
As someone who's lived in several countries, I get the itch to get out of America for a while...but seriously-the metric system is the main draw?
Of course! Do you think I want to see and hear miles, yards, feet, Fahrenheit, etc. daily?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:20 PM
 
Location: NYC
2,545 posts, read 3,297,217 times
Reputation: 1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjun18 View Post
Sorry, I didn't know cities are ranked by only how many law firms and accounting offices are there.

I guess things like public transportation, education, healthcare, density, airports, city population/metro population, diversity, finance, growth, etc, and other factors are not taken into consideration. Oh well...
I didnt know that either, but apparently that's how you rank them given the stated basis for your view that Toronto and Boston can not possibly be on the same level ... i.e. that an organization which ranks cities based on accounting and law offices designated one as "alpha" and the other as "beta".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:46 PM
 
1,635 posts, read 2,712,349 times
Reputation: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzrovian View Post
I didnt know that either, but apparently that's how you rank them given the stated basis for your view that Toronto and Boston can not possibly be on the same level ... i.e. that an organization which ranks cities based on accounting and law offices designated one as "alpha" and the other as "beta".
Not trying to turn this into a Boston/Toronto thread, but do you feel Boston ranks higher than Toronto to you, on an overall scale?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 09:50 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,131 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrjun18 View Post
Not trying to turn this into a Boston/Toronto thread, but do you feel Boston ranks higher than Toronto to you, on an overall scale?
They seem about equal overall with their own strengths and weaknesses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 10:07 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,508,014 times
Reputation: 5884
The city/urban part of Toronto feels quite a bit bigger than Boston in my limited experience of both cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Fairfax
2,904 posts, read 6,915,579 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by homeinatx View Post
Racist much?
Even some of the Arabs in Paris will tell you there are too many immigrants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Fairfax
2,904 posts, read 6,915,579 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jews for Jesus View Post
Of course! Do you think I want to see and hear miles, yards, feet, Fahrenheit, etc. daily?!
Haha...I do like me some meters!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 05:15 AM
 
Location: Cambridge, MA/London, UK
3,865 posts, read 5,289,162 times
Reputation: 3366
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
The city/urban part of Toronto feels quite a bit bigger than Boston in my limited experience of both cities.
As it should, because Toronto is the bigger city. I think people are referring to overall and if you factor in other criteria (public transit, GDP, wealth, education, healthcare, food, culture, etc..) Boston and Toronto are absolutely in the same class. Which as someone who has lived in both is not a slight to either city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 06:47 AM
 
517 posts, read 678,294 times
Reputation: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOkidd View Post
The population of the city of Dallas is 1.1 million. That's considerably less than half the size of the city of Toronto. If you're referring to the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA and trying to pass it off as one city, that's ridiculous.
I would imagine comparing metro areas is much more reasonable than comparing cities. Wouldn't comparing city populations be far more ridiculous? City boundaries are completely random and not comparable.

I mean, you really think Berlin is much bigger than Paris? You really think Sydney, Australia is a small town? You really think San Francisco is a suburb of San Jose?

Dallas and Toronto are about the same size, IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Toronto
2,801 posts, read 3,858,118 times
Reputation: 3154
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCH_CDM View Post
I would imagine comparing metro areas is much more reasonable than comparing cities. Wouldn't comparing city populations be far more ridiculous? City boundaries are completely random and not comparable.

I mean, you really think Berlin is much bigger than Paris? You really think Sydney, Australia is a small town? You really think San Francisco is a suburb of San Jose?

Dallas and Toronto are about the same size, IMO.
Do you really think the borders of metro areas are any less random?
If Berlin is bigger than Paris, why does it matter? Its population is bigger - who cares? Sydney Australia's population is not that of a small town, but reflects the fact that most of its residents live in the suburbs. San Francisco is not a suburb of San Jose just because San Jose has a larger population. They are both cities in another Metro area clusterf**k, and both stand on their own.

Dallas and Toronto are not the same size, because the Dallas you are talking about is not Dallas - it is an amalgamation of dozens of cities and suburbs. And its borders are just as random as for any city. Now if you want to argue that the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA is the same size as the Greater Toronto Area or whatever, go to town, but when you say Dallas, say what you mean, because Dallas is not a single city in the way you speak of. Toronto is. And it's much bigger, denser, and more urban. As I already posted, the population density of the City of Dallas is similar to some of Toronto's suburbs. One of Toronto's suburbs (Mississauga) is the same size as the city of Fort Worth, and Mississauga is not even included in Toronto's population. So even combining Dallas, Fort Worth, and Arlington, these three cities still do not match the population of the City of Toronto. It's only when you start adding up the population of every single town and suburb in the MSA that you are able to reach a number close to 7,000,000, but most of those residents are not city-dwellers, but residents of a far-flung town or suburb that is part of the CSA.

Furthermore, many cities in America have turned themselves into massive metropolitan areas by simply swallowing every nearby town, city and suburb and thereby tripled and quadrupled their population, making them sound much bigger than they are. They have created borders for themselves that are just as arbitrary as the city borders you seem to have a beef with. The majority of those 7,000,000 people who live in the Dallas-Fort Woth-Arlington MSA live in a suburb, which could be miles and miles from Dallas Proper. The population density for the MSA is extremely low, so you are comparing apples to oranges with Dallas and Toronto. One is a sprawling amalgamation of dozens of towns, suburbs, and a couple of cities, while the other is a single city, and one of the densest urban areas in North America, right up there with Chicago and San Francisco.

Last edited by TOkidd; 08-27-2013 at 07:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top