Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Motormaker is referring to largest county by land area, while you're thinking of population size, goonsta. Counties are not all created equal, some states don't have any, some states don't have county governments, etc., etc. It's inaccurate to have a real comparison between counties of different state, but if county statistics make you happy, go ahead and argue over them, just make your own thread.
Last edited by Astorian31; 01-12-2014 at 02:41 PM..
Wow, you really are a ridiculous booster. I remember a discussion I had with you a couple a months ago when you suddenly decided CSA statics were more important than metro-area stats since the metro-area statics didn't support your claims. It's funny how you've changed your tune since then.
Well it doesnt matter because whether by CSA or MSA, LA and SF are both ahead of NY as far as percentage and LA beats NY at city, MSA and CSA level.
So yeah...
Quote:
Anyway NYC metro are has a larger foreign born population. The thread asked for who has more internationals, not who has a bigger percentage. Even by your metrics, you're still providing the wrong answer to this poll.
Yes, but the population of NYC is not more International than the population of LA because LA has a larger proportion(i.e. PERCENTAGE) of foreigners than NYC.
Well it doesnt matter because whether by CSA or MSA, LA and SF are both ahead of NY as far as percentage and LA beats NY at city, MSA and CSA level.
So yeah...
Yes, but the population of NYC is not more International than the population of LA because LA has a larger proportion(i.e. PERCENTAGE) of foreigners than NYC.
Period.
Who is arguing that NYC metro has a a higher percentage of foreign borns than LA or SF metros? NO-ONE! The point is that you have a tendency to bring up different, irrelevant metrics or statistics to make your point. If city statistics aren't what you want them to be, you'll use MSA even if no-one asked for it. If MSA statistics don't agree with your claims, you'll declare CSA statistics as more relevant, even, if again, no-one asks for them. In this case, since the answer to the question of the poll doesn't suite your liking, you start talking about population percentage, even though it's irrelevant to the poll. Again, the poll asked who has more internationals, not who has a higher percentage of internationals.
Last edited by Astorian31; 01-12-2014 at 03:01 PM..
Who is arguing that NYC metro has a a higher percentage of foreign borns than LA or SF metros? NO-ONE! The point is that you have a tendency to bring up different, irrelevant metrics or statistics to make your point. If city statistics aren't what you want them to be, you'll use MSA even if no-one asked for it. If MSA statistics don't agree with your claims, you'll declare CSA statistics as more relevant, even, if again, no-one asks for them. In this case, since the answer to the question of the poll doesn't suite your liking, you start talking about population percentage, even though it's irrelevant to the poll. Again, the poll asked who has more internationals, not who has a higher percentage of internationals.
Yeah, so I dont really care about incessant whining tho.
However you may continue if that's what you need to feel better but it's meaningless to me.
Who is arguing that NYC metro has a a higher percentage of foreign borns than LA or SF metros? NO-ONE! The point is that you have a tendency to bring up different, irrelevant metrics or statistics to make your point. If city statistics aren't what you want them to be, you'll use MSA even if no-one asked for it. If MSA statistics don't agree with your claims, you'll declare CSA statistics as more relevant, even, if again, no-one asks for them. In this case, since the answer to the question of the poll doesn't suite your liking, you start talking about population percentage, even though it's irrelevant to the poll. Again, the poll asked who has more internationals, not who has a higher percentage of internationals.
One more time for the people in the back!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair
Yeah, so I dont really care about incessant whining tho.
However you may continue if that's what you need to feel better but it's meaningless to me.
Anything else?
You're so funny. No one is whining Montclair. It's just funny to me how you love to bring in statistics or other information no one asked for.
No one asked you which metric is being used the most to determine a simple question.
All 3 are very int'l... why does it matter that that point??? this is so silly.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
