Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of these is LA closest to in urban/walkable?
NYC 4 3.81%
Chicago/SF/Boston/Phiily 23 21.90%
Miami 78 74.29%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Exactly. As far as urban build and walkability is concerned, I'd say that these two cities are fairly similar, which is why Miami is leading in the poll by a healthy margin.

I remember a while back you posted some links of walkable South Florida beach towns that were similar to walkable SoCal beach towns. Do you remember what I'm talking about?
Miami has very few zip codes that hit even 70+ on walkscore. They're virtually all located within city limits.

Last edited by RaymondChandlerLives; 01-28-2014 at 04:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
I could also walk across Atlanta. Yet there's a difference between walking across Atlanta and walking across London. The same goes for walking across any lengthy stretch of San Francisco and Los Angeles.
San Francisco is more pedestrian friendly than Central LA, but the gap is MUCH smaller between the two than Atlanta/London. Be serious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15073
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
San Francisco is more pedestrian friendly than Central LA, but the gap is MUCH smaller between the two than Atlanta/London. Be serious.
That wasn't the point. It's dumb to say "You could walk clear across L.A. if you have the stamina" since that applies to any city. If I can play three straight hours of full court basketball, then I'm pretty sure I could walk across any city if so inclined. There's a big difference between walking in L.A. for two miles and walking in SF for two miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
That wasn't the point. It's dumb to say "You could walk clear across L.A. if you have the stamina" since that applies to any city. If I can play three straight hours of full court basketball, then I'm pretty sure I could walk across any city if so inclined. There's a big difference between walking in L.A. for two miles and walking in SF for two miles.
I think the point he was making is that you can walk insane distances in LA without running into streets that lack retail and amenities. I'm talking 15 miles and up. This cannot be accomplished even in Boston/DC because of their relatively diminutive size, and it definitely can't be accomplished in Miami--a city/metro with a retail density comparable to OC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15073
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
I think the point he was making is that you can walk insane distances in LA without running into streets that lack retail and amenities. I'm talking 15 miles and up. This cannot be accomplished even in Boston/DC because of their relatively diminutive size, and it definitely can't be accomplished in Miami--a city/metro with a retail density comparable to OC.
That can't be accomplished in Barcelona either because the city is tiny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Passaic, NJ
127 posts, read 192,927 times
Reputation: 62
I put Miami, because the weather is closest. Chicago, Philly, & NYC aren't really walkable in the winter. But as in danger, I guess NYC, because none of Manhattan is really bad for just visiting, except Harlem or ones like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,237,207 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
That can't be accomplished in Barcelona either because the city is tiny.
LA is huge but its densly packed and amenities are within walking distance of most of our neighborhoods. This is why I find myself walking more here than I did when I lived in DC. Many DC neighborhoods lacked simple things like a bank or grocery store especially across the Anacostia River.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
That can't be accomplished in Barcelona either because the city is tiny.
The truly walkable areas of metro a BOS/DC are tiny relative to Barcelona, don't even try equating them.

DC/BOS are closer to LA in pedestrian friendliness than they are to Barcelona.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15073
You guys should handle this by starting a thread in the L.A. forum. The vast majority of the people in this forum voted Miami. Do you think the majority of posters in the L.A. forum would do the same?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2014, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,237,207 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
You guys should handle this by starting a thread in the L.A. forum. The vast majority of the people in this forum voted Miami. Do you think the majority of posters in the L.A. forum would do the same?
When people say they chose Miami because the LA weather is closest to it I'm not taking the majority too seriously like most of these threads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top