Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2014, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Downtown LA
1,192 posts, read 1,643,055 times
Reputation: 868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Dude View Post
SF is only seen as bad because it is criminally over priced and its infrastructure neglected.

LA is my vote. The city is filthy, has a third world culture only out done by Miami, and a pathetic downtown with under utilized and under developed rail transit.

Hence why it is out classed by cities that are a fraction of it's size.
Spoken like a typical SF limousine liberal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Louisville
5,294 posts, read 6,060,659 times
Reputation: 9623
Any city where homers create polls designed to get people to pick their city and then get pissed of when someone picks the legit choice. There are about 6 I can think of and they all have major market envy lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 06:38 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,109,900 times
Reputation: 1036
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistrictDirt View Post
Spoken like a typical SF limousine liberal
That guy actually pretty much hates SF if you read some of his other posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 06:44 PM
 
Location: San Leandro
4,576 posts, read 9,160,769 times
Reputation: 3248
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistrictDirt View Post
Spoken like a typical SF limousine liberal
Actually, I am a san leandro, honda, moderate. But nice try. 2/10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,948,017 times
Reputation: 3908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
How do you figure? The apartment in Friends would cost multiple millions to actually live in, yet they apparently can support it on a barista's and chef's income.
Supposedly it was a rent-controlled apartment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 08:35 PM
 
409 posts, read 587,657 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
What are some cities that CvC often hold in high regard but are in reality bad places to live? I would say NYC. Most CDers give NYC a romanticized appearance that are depicted on Friends and Seinfeld. What they don't mention is how NYC is one of the most segregated cities in the country in terms of wealth and race. NYC has an overreaching police force that disproportionately target black and Hispanic men. There are 22,000 homeless children in the city alone. Now why is NYC always defended on CvC?
You seem to have a really biased view of NYC. So that's the reason that you disagree with others opinions.

NYC isn't really more segregated by wealth and race than other big cities, the police force doesn't "disproportionally target black and Hispanic men" compared to other cities, and there aren't proportionally more homeless in NYC than in other cities.

So the reason NYC is defended from comments like yours, is because your comments are quite obviously wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 08:39 PM
 
409 posts, read 587,657 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
Unless you're a multi-millionaire, you can forget about raising a family there. The economics just doesn't make sense.
There are far more families in NYC than in any other city in the U.S., and I'm pretty sure they aren't all multi-millionaires. Why would they be? Rent burden isn't much higher than other cities, most households don't own vehicles, and things like food and clothes cost the same as anywhere else (groceries possibly less).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 10:15 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,558 posts, read 28,652,113 times
Reputation: 25148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Standard111 View Post
There are far more families in NYC than in any other city in the U.S., and I'm pretty sure they aren't all multi-millionaires. Why would they be? Rent burden isn't much higher than other cities, most households don't own vehicles, and things like food and clothes cost the same as anywhere else (groceries possibly less).
A normal middle-class family lifestyle in most of America looks something like: a husband, wife and 2 kids living in a 2500 square foot single family home with 2 cars, a garage and a yard. Also, well-rated public elementary, middle and high schools nearby to send the kids to.

How much do you think this lifestyle would cost per year in New York City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 10:40 PM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,994,819 times
Reputation: 7333
I'll make it easy on everyone here: all of them. The whole lot.

Every single city sucks in multiple ways. A fact that is compounded by how much you may or may not make. Forget about finding a city that will make you happy merely by you being in it or it's density, proximity to water, public transit system, number of Fortune 500 companies, or cute little cupcake shops that charge days salary in India for a mediocre pastry.

Happiness comes from within, finding a career that supports that inner self worth, and having supportive friends and family around you. So long as you have that, you will find happiness and joy matter where you live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 12:11 AM
 
Location: Where Else...?
739 posts, read 1,187,768 times
Reputation: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8to32characters View Post
Dallas & Houston--dirty, poor air quality, high crime, lots of ghetto areas, lack of emphasis on fitness/nutrition, no one cares about nature, too many religious zealots, lots of covert racism, bad roads, arguably the worst weather in the country (humidity/tornadoes/hail storms/ice storms/hurricanes), incredibly backwards areas nearby, uninspiring topography.
this is proof that Houston isn't "romanticized" on this forum.... This is and has been the types of comments made in general when Houston is mentioned.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top