Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015, 03:09 PM
 
2,491 posts, read 2,673,238 times
Reputation: 3388

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK115 View Post
St. Louis has never hosted, even though they have a domed stadium. Detroit, Indianapolis, and Minneapolis are the only cold weather domed stadiums and they have all hosted in the past couple of years (or are getting ready to host).

Places I'd like to see host in no particular order are St. Louis, Nashville, Denver, Seattle, Charlotte, Oakland, and maybe Boston. None of them have ever hosted before. I predict Atlanta will get 2019 (and Miami is updating their stadium so they might get one in the future).

St Louis no longer has an NFL team. They moved to California in 2015 and are now the Inglewood Rams.
Try to keep up here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2015, 03:10 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,977 posts, read 32,535,299 times
Reputation: 13625
Quote:
Originally Posted by SK115 View Post
Plus both cities are in danger of losing their teams. It's a shame, really.
And to the same city where they both played previously lol.

I'm ok with the Raiders leaving though. Their fanbase is annoying and they ruined the Coliseum when they moved back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,769 posts, read 28,954,736 times
Reputation: 37326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddyline View Post
St Louis no longer has an NFL team. They moved to California in 2015 and are now the Inglewood Rams.
Try to keep up here.
I remember when that happen and they then won like six Super Bowls in a row, beating Cleveland every time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 03:34 PM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,092 posts, read 9,903,516 times
Reputation: 5751
Baltimore, Philadelphia, DC (Landover, MD)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 03:56 PM
 
3,755 posts, read 4,786,758 times
Reputation: 2857
It's unfortunate that a great city like San Diego cannot host the Super Bowl anymore due to their stadium being outdated in the eyes of the NFL.

Seattle would be a good choice. Their stadium is not too far from downtown and it is transit accessible and the weather can be a bit milder than say Minneapolis, or Detroit in late January/earl February.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,666,565 times
Reputation: 5872
Of course I have to go with Denver! I know the city was thinking about bidding for 2018/2019, but I think it's out of the question for now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
6,485 posts, read 12,505,554 times
Reputation: 4126
Quote:
Originally Posted by north2south. View Post
I saw other cities that didn't have an nfl team posted on the first page. San Antonio has the alamo some which the saints used during Katrina. It would bring some much need rejuvenation to the stadium and area. It would be different.
The NFL will not put the Super Bowl in a non-NFL city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
6,485 posts, read 12,505,554 times
Reputation: 4126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghengis View Post

Minneapolis was doing Super Bowls long before the Colts snuck out of Baltimore under the cover of darkness, take a number
Minneapolis hosted in 1992. The Colts left Baltimore in 1984. Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 05:57 PM
 
207 posts, read 344,605 times
Reputation: 140
Okay I get that... I thought he was asking which cities that you wouldn't traditionally find the Super Bowl would be cool to see it in.. And I mentioned all cities that have teams besides one which has a stadium and has had an nfl team play there for a season..

Jeesh...

I think Out of my list denver and Kansas City would be coolest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,446,990 times
Reputation: 4778
They should put the Super Bowl in Alaska, football needs to be played in the cold like it was invented for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top