Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you think Houston will overtake Chicago?
Yes 28 45.90%
No 33 54.10%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2015, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,467,718 times
Reputation: 4778

Advertisements

I would say yes but not by 2020 maybe 2030 thats not good news for Houston. I would never live in a city as big as NYC, Chicago or LA, too many hassles, taxes are too high and real estate for a super nice house is outrageous. Houston is doing really well in population gain right now due to a good diversified economy but the more population gains they make their cost of living will go up a lot in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2015, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKWildcat1981 View Post
I would say yes but not by 2020 maybe 2030 thats not good news for Houston. I would never live in a city as big as NYC, Chicago or LA, too many hassles, taxes are too high and real estate for a super nice house is outrageous. Houston is doing really well in population gain right now due to a good diversified economy but the more population gains they make their cost of living will go up a lot in the future.
I did an analysis of rental prices for MSAs not long ago via the CPI. From 2009 to present, I think Houston grew almost as fast in rental prices (MSA wise) as anybody else except maybe San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 12:10 PM
 
520 posts, read 611,293 times
Reputation: 753
The sleeper is that San Francisco and San Jose combine into one MSA and surpass them both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,405,787 times
Reputation: 993
Crazy to think of Chicago as the America's 4th city, but it will happen, diminishing Chicago's global status even more than it already is IMO.

https://kinder.rice.edu/Keatts061615/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by smashystyle View Post
The sleeper is that San Francisco and San Jose combine into one MSA and surpass them both.
If you combine San Francisco MSA with San Jose MSA you essentially get the San Francisco CSA, and San Francisco CSA still falls short of Chicago, I'm sorry.

San Francisco 388,272
San Jose 196,829

combined 585,101

Chicago MSA GDP = 590,248
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
Crazy to think of Chicago as the America's 4th city, but it will happen, diminishing Chicago's global status even more than it already is IMO.

https://kinder.rice.edu/Keatts061615/
It may fall to 4th in GDP, but it will take Houston several decades before it passes Chicago in MSA population. Houston still falls 3 million people short.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,405,787 times
Reputation: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
It may fall to 4th in GDP, but it will take Houston several decades before it passes Chicago in MSA population. Houston still falls 3 million people short.
But according to the article even at the MSA level, Houston should surpass Chicago in the near future if current population trends maintain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
But according to the article even at the MSA level, Houston should surpass Chicago in the near future if current population trends maintain.
That's decades away. Unless everyone from San Antonio ups and moves to Houston, it's going to take Houston AT LEAST another 20 years to reach the population level that Chicago is at now. The only way for Houston to pass it in 20ish years if Chicago COMPLETELY stagnates, which is not likely.

The GDP overtake is very real, Houston is nipping at the heels of Chicago, population is still decades off.

The article you're posting compares city population, which is pretty irrelevant. By city population Indianapolis is bigger than San Francisco, Washington D.C., Boston, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit, Miami, and Atlanta. When you compare MSA's the cities are separated by millions. There are still 3 million more people in Chicago MSA vs Houston MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
But according to the article even at the MSA level, Houston should surpass Chicago in the near future if current population trends maintain.
At the current growth rates, it will be at least 2030 for the city alone before it surpasses Chicago. That's 15 years away and 15 years is a lot of time for any city to rise/fall.

As far as MSA level goes, if Houston increased by 140K per year and Chicago was 25K per year, then it would take until 2043 for Houston to surpass Chicago's MSA, which is about 30 years away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,405,787 times
Reputation: 993
^^^Still the point stands that in the near future, tourists and fellow Americans will view Houston as the third largest city, taking that prominence away from Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top