Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Im house shopping down here right now and its great. Definately a buyers market. The sellers are much more willing to work with a potential buyer. Compare that to our house we sold in Dallas where you had to offer 10% over asking to even get a chance.
Houston is a boom bust city. Always has been. Things are a little better now because of the Medical industry and the city's efforts to diversify the economy. Oil still runs things around here and it always will. As such, the city will ride the highs and lows more so than most.
To answer the OP's question: The only way Houston passes Chicago is in city proper population. Its a long way off from having the cultural significance of Chicago or having a similar sized economy or having a similar sized metro area population. I can comfortably say that I feel Houston is more diverse than Chicago though.
As for SF to LA, thats an even further flung comparrison. SF wont match LA's prominance in our lifetime.
In terms of cultural relevance, obviously yes, x1000. LA is probably the greatest cultural exporter on earth. I would say only NYC rivals LA for global cultural exports.
Perhaps but that still is NOT enough to stop San Francisco Bay from surpassing it overall.
Furthermore, LA( or NYC for that matter) has nothing that refutes how in a relatively short amount of time, the Bay Area has literally changed the way mankind communicates, connects to one another and expresses themselves.
LA puts out pop culture diversions, and that's necessary to soften our nation's image abroad, so great.
But you can't deny the gargantuan amount of economic power now radiating from up north, and the Bay Area's unparalleled ability to attract billions of people to consume what we produce.
Perhaps but that still is NOT enough to stop San Francisco Bay from surpassing it overall.
Furthermore, LA( or NYC for that matter) has nothing that refutes how in a relatively short amount of time, the Bay Area has literally changed the way mankind communicates, connects to one another and expresses themselves.
LA puts out pop culture diversions, and that's necessary to soften our nation's image abroad, so great.
But you can't deny the gargantuan amount of economic power now radiating from up north, and the Bay Area's unparalleled ability to attract billions of people to consume what we produce.
It's almost scary.
I can't even...this guy is too much
The only thing that's scary is how much of your own kool-aid you've drank, bruh.
Location: East Central Pennsylvania/ Chicago for 6yrs.
2,535 posts, read 3,284,404 times
Reputation: 1483
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101
Those bums on Market St. pooping in the bushes are now "Gods"? Who knew!
DID YOU HAVE A BAD EVENING ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101
Sorry, but no. You're referencing annual estimates, not Census counts. Took me about 2 seconds to disprove your claims.
And, no offense, but that might have been the most pathetic, blatantly homerist post on this thread. Your own posted estimates showed that Houston and LA have about the same growth, well within margin of error, so you confirm my whole point. Even homers misusing data and not understanding the Census can't come up with a year where LA isn't the growth leader.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.