Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:06 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,422,196 times
Reputation: 354

Advertisements

Downtown LA barely gets any credit. I haven't been to downtown Seattle, but I have a hard time believing it's busier overall.
If places like little Tokyo, the fashion district were in other cities they'd get far more attention.
It's just overshadowed here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:09 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,422,196 times
Reputation: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
People on here really are over-rating Seattle and underestimating Los Angeles urbanity, which apparently people are only aware of Santa Monica. You can live in Central LA, in a nice neighborhood such as Miracle Mile, have access to markets, art galleries, museums (such as LACMA), great food, bars, lounges, shopping (20 minute walk to the Grove), music venues (the infamous El Rey) etc. My aunt lived there for years, and every time I visited her we never got into the car. There was one time I dropped my car at her place, and walked to West Hollywood to go photograph LA pride. Around a 30 minute walk, but didn't even feel it since there was so much going on on the street level to keep me distracted.

From Miracle Mile, you have access to the Fairfax district, Museum Row, 3rd Street and it's amazing restaurants, West Hollywood (another incredibly urbane pocket of LA county), and can easily take a bus down Wilshire to Westwood/UCLA, Santa Monica beach or Koreatown. Honestly, if you are considering visiting LA and don't want to drive, stay here, you'll love it. Currently they are working on purple line extension, which will only ADD to the urbanity of this part of the city, connecting to the other great urban areas of LA like Hollywood + adjacent, Downtown etc.
Don't forget Melrose. And the farmers market/the grove is always bustling.

The golden Triangle/beverly drive. Venice boardwalk. Abbot Kinney.

There's pedestrians everywhere. It's just not seamlessly connected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego
591 posts, read 813,714 times
Reputation: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
People on here really are over-rating Seattle and underestimating Los Angeles
Overrating Seattle? Seattle is very walkable and dense in its core and outer neighborhoods.
What do you know about Seattle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,470,415 times
Reputation: 1540
Quote:
Originally Posted by dapper23 View Post
Overrating Seattle? Seattle is very walkable and dense in its core and outer neighborhoods.
What do you know about Seattle?
In relativity to each other (Seattle vs. LA sense). I'm a big fan of Seattle, but LA has more to offer. Imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,470,415 times
Reputation: 1540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
Don't forget Melrose. And the farmers market/the grove is always bustling.

The golden Triangle/beverly drive. Venice boardwalk. Abbot Kinney.

There's pedestrians everywhere. It's just not seamlessly connected.
Yeahp, but outside of Triangle/Beverly Hills, the others aren't as cohesive with the central LA nabes I was talking about, which all blend into each other very well. In part, thanks to Wilshire Blvd, Fairfax, LA Brea and Santa Monica blvd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:22 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,422,196 times
Reputation: 354
What's la central walk score (the size of many of those cities land area)

I bet it's top 5.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:29 PM
 
Location: San Diego
591 posts, read 813,714 times
Reputation: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
In relativity to each other (Seattle vs. LA sense). I'm a big fan of Seattle, but LA has more to offer. Imo.
As a whole, LA will obviously have a larger number urban streets or "offerings" than Seattle, or any other city except NYC for that matter.
The difference is that a city like Seattle is walkable essentially throughout. You don't have to get on a freeway or highway to go from spot to spot. The downtown core which includes Belltown, SoDo, Pioneer Square, and Lower Queen Anne is very walkable (and it's not as hilly as people make it seem).

The outer neighborhoods; Capitol Hill, Ballard, U-District, Fremont, Wallingford etc are all very dense and have significant urbanity.

Seattle is urban throughout, whereas LA is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,392,949 times
Reputation: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
People on here really are over-rating Seattle and underestimating Los Angeles urbanity, which apparently people are only aware of Santa Monica. You can live in Central LA, in a nice neighborhood such as Miracle Mile, have access to markets, art galleries, museums (such as LACMA), great food, bars, lounges, shopping (20 minute walk to the Grove), music venues (the infamous El Rey) etc. My aunt lived there for years, and every time I visited her we never got into the car. There was one time I dropped my car at her place, and walked to West Hollywood to go photograph LA pride. Around a 30 minute walk, but didn't even feel it since there was so much going on on the street level to keep me distracted.

From Miracle Mile, you have access to the Fairfax district, Museum Row, 3rd Street and it's amazing restaurants, West Hollywood (another incredibly urbane pocket of LA county), and can easily take a bus down Wilshire to Westwood/UCLA, Santa Monica beach or Koreatown. Honestly, if you are considering visiting LA and don't want to drive, stay here, you'll love it. Currently they are working on purple line extension, which will only ADD to the urbanity of this part of the city, connecting to the other great urban areas of LA like Hollywood + adjacent, Downtown etc.
As someone who has lived in both cities extensively I wholeheartedly agree, LA's core is more gritty/urban/lively/dense etc. However it truly lacks the desirability factor that the core of Seattle has, and that's exactly the reason why many put it above LA, that or they judge LA outside the core in comparison to Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,470,415 times
Reputation: 1540
Quote:
Originally Posted by dapper23 View Post
As a whole, LA will obviously have a larger number urban streets or "offerings" than Seattle, or any other city except NYC for that matter.
The difference is that a city like Seattle is walkable essentially throughout. You don't have to get on a freeway or highway to go from spot to spot. The downtown core which includes Belltown, SoDo, Pioneer Square, and Lower Queen Anne is very walkable (and it's not as hilly as people make it seem).

The outer neighborhoods; Capitol Hill, Ballard, U-District, Fremont, Wallingford etc are all very dense and have significant urbanity.

Seattle is urban throughout, whereas LA is not.
I can see that. I think Seattle has a good balance of urbanity and amenities without feeling like over-kill with density (a le New York).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,470,415 times
Reputation: 1540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
As someone who has lived in both cities extensively I wholeheartedly agree, LA's core is more gritty/urban/lively/dense etc. However it truly lacks the desirability factor that the core of Seattle has, and that's exactly the reason why many put it above LA, that or they judge LA outside the core in comparison to Seattle.
Yeah, Seattle has this 'pleasant' factor, that LA just doesn't have. Nonetheless, as you mentioned it still has A LOT to offer, and as I mentioned, imo more, even if it doesn't have the aesthetic people relate with 'urbane'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top