Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: The next urban, iconic, "big city"?
Los Angeles 53 21.99%
Seattle 63 26.14%
Denver 11 4.56%
Minneapolis 13 5.39%
Atlanta 33 13.69%
Miami 19 7.88%
Baltimore 5 2.07%
Pittsburgh 8 3.32%
St. Louis 3 1.24%
Other (please name) 33 13.69%
Voters: 241. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2017, 09:26 AM
PDF
 
11,395 posts, read 13,418,339 times
Reputation: 6707

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
I'd say it's between Seattle and LA. LA is obviously much bigger but having been to both cities, Seattle to me seemed to have a stronger urban fabric in/around the core, and in general didn't seem as extremely spread out as LA.

But LA is really trying to turn itself around, and is even expanding their subway which is a very expensive to do these days and shows they are serious about this. I think the fact that LA even has a rapid transit system gives it a huge advantage, even though it is very lacking. So I'm going to go with LA with Seattle close behind.
Whenever I'm in LA, I get around without a car. But as much rail lines as the city builds, I don't think it'll ever be known as a good place to live car free. So that's an advantage Seattle has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2017, 09:46 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,994,681 times
Reputation: 1988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Yes I know that. Which is why I said you will never see cities like that built again. Try as any city might, it won't happen. Again though, that doesn't mean they can't become urban.
Seattle is-in effect-coping with a rising population by throwing together apartment buildings. This seems to be a relatively quick way to provide housing. And also raises the population density in a rather compact form.

I can imagine creating new mixed use areas by grouping apartment buildings with retail and offices. (The retail would likely be chain stores).

Last edited by Tim Randal Walker; 05-14-2017 at 10:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,886,156 times
Reputation: 3419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Randal Walker View Post
Seattle is-in effect-coping with a rising population by throwing together apartment buildings. This seems to be a relatively quick way to provide housing. And also raises the population density in a rather compact form.

I can imagine creating new mixed use areas by grouping apartment buildings with retail and offices. (The retail would likely be chain stores).
It's quite exciting to live in Seattle at the moment because nearly every conceivable vacant lot or mediocre property within Seattle's several primary urban districts is slated for redevelopment. Housing costs are rising, but that's at least kept in check by the blistering rapid construction of apartments throughout the city. Seattle's also getting dozens of new underground/elevated light rail stations within the next decade. The Seattle region as a whole is going to be absolutely changed and different by 2030. Certainly by 2050, I foresee Seattle becoming an ultra-dense city. Very exciting times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 10:35 AM
 
429 posts, read 479,876 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by That_One_Guy View Post
I'd say it's between Seattle and LA. LA is obviously much bigger but having been to both cities, Seattle to me seemed to have a stronger urban fabric in/around the core, and in general didn't seem as extremely spread out as LA.

But LA is really trying to turn itself around, and is even expanding their subway which is a very expensive to do these days and shows they are serious about this. I think the fact that LA even has a rapid transit system gives it a huge advantage, even though it is very lacking. So I'm going to go with LA with Seattle close behind.
Good points overall, but don't forget Seattle just approved a $54 billion rail expansion, including a second subway tunnel through the urban core and several other grade separated lines across the city and region.

Last edited by Edward234; 05-14-2017 at 10:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
I think LA, Seattle and Miami are all the next group coming in to join the pack.

Seattle's downtown and surrounding core neighborhoods are certainly getting there.

LA has Downtown, Koreatown, Hollywood/West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Century City, Santa Monica/Venice which are all there or getting there. Basically urban nodes, and now it's just filling in the holes and connecting the dots between those.

Miami has Downtown and Brickell which are getting there, and then Miami Beach and South Beach which are already there, and as vibrant and walkable as Philly, DC, San Fran and Boston.

So I would say:

NYC
Chicago
San Fran
Philly
D.C.
Boston
LA
Seattle
Miami

The only thing is, who is 10? Atlanta? San Diego? Honolulu? Baltimore? Denver? Minneapolis? They all make a good case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 11:06 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,994,681 times
Reputation: 1988
Awhile back, in another thread, Baltimore was grouped with Seattle. The two were grouped in a cusp between the big urban cities, and every place else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 11:18 AM
PDF
 
11,395 posts, read 13,418,339 times
Reputation: 6707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward234 View Post
Good points overall, but don't forget Seattle just approved a $54 billion rail expansion, including a second subway tunnel through the urban core and several other grade separated lines across the city and region.
I went in 2008, before the light rail and all this new development. I remember taking the bus in the underground tunnel, was pretty cool. I was impressed with Seattle even back then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Middle America
11,103 posts, read 7,159,415 times
Reputation: 17006
Since everyone has difference preferences and likes, there's no way to choose one overall "iconic" city. This poll simply can't be meaningful, other than to take a sampling of the highest preferences of those on this forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 11:41 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,994,681 times
Reputation: 1988
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatsbyGatz View Post
It's quite exciting to live in Seattle at the moment nt by 2030. Certainly by 2050, I foresee Seattle becoming an ultra-dense city. Very exciting times.
Agreed, it is exciting!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2017, 11:46 AM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,869,333 times
Reputation: 8679
LA's pervasive development is taking it a long way. But on a per-square-mile basis, Seattle's urban districts seem to be urbanizing more quickly...both greater Downtown and dozens of other nodes around town, from Ballard to Bellevue. Downtown Seattle is well ahead of DTLA in most regards and also growing faster (a lead in housing, and several multiples in offices). The two cities are the leaders in rail funding as well, though LA is ahead on its system (Seattle will always be way ahead in transit use overall due to buses).

It's hard to compare a city that's already iconic and huge but lacks the top-end traditional urbanity with one that's closer to traditional urbanity but is much smaller. LA is obviously iconic already. And it's denser as a UA and in peak neighborhoods in terms of residents. But Seattle is sorta iconic in a second-tier way already, and its finally starting to live its urbanity and transit destiny. So I voted Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top