Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-30-2017, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,093,890 times
Reputation: 2312

Advertisements

Will the 2020 census reveal Portland, Oregon's MSA to be larger than the combined metros of Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse?

By the time 2020 rolls around and if the PDX continues its growth, the metro population three on one handicap race could be neck and neck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2017, 10:04 AM
 
93,164 posts, read 123,754,884 times
Reputation: 18252
This is different...Portland's CSA has a little more than the CSA's of those cities, but some counties are left out in terms of that area of NY. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_statistical_area


In terms of metro are though, the NY combined metros I believe still have more people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...tistical_Areas


You may also have to consider metro land size as well. For instance, the Portland MSA covers 6683 square miles. In terms of the NY metros mentioned, the Buffalo metro covers 1566 square miles, the Rochester metro covers 2928 square miles and the Syracuse metro covers 2385 square miles. Those 3 combine to cover 7179 square miles. So, the NY combined metros(which do not completely connect, btw), have just under 2.9 million people or roughly 450,000 more people with 496 more square miles than Portland.


This also speaks to the difference in terms of land size between different regions as well.

Last edited by ckhthankgod; 09-30-2017 at 10:14 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,093,890 times
Reputation: 2312
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
This is different...Portland's CSA has a little more than the CSA's of those cities, but some counties are left out in terms of that area of NY. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_statistical_area


In terms of metro are though, the NY combined metros I believe still have more people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...tistical_Areas


You may also have to consider metro land size as well. For instance, the Portland MSA covers 6683 square miles. In terms of the NY metros mentioned, the Buffalo metro covers 1566 square miles, the Rochester metro covers 2928 square miles and the Syracuse metro covers 2385 square miles. Those 3 combine to cover 7179 square miles. So, the NY combined metros(which do not completely connect, btw), have just under 2.9 million people or roughly 450,000 more people with 496 more square miles than Portland.


This also speaks to the difference in terms of land size between different regions as well.
Good point, but that's mainly because some of the PDX counties are huge but relatively barren in most of their area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 11:02 AM
 
93,164 posts, read 123,754,884 times
Reputation: 18252
Quote:
Originally Posted by SyraBrian View Post
Good point, but that's mainly because some of the PDX counties are huge but relatively barren in most of their area.
That makes sense...You don't have barren areas in the area that covers those 3 NY metros, but some parts can get quite rural and sparsely populated(i.e.-the towns south of Syracuse or say south of Henrietta in the Rochester area).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 12:38 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,843,744 times
Reputation: 8651
Western counties can be much bigger. It's not the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 12:46 PM
 
93,164 posts, read 123,754,884 times
Reputation: 18252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Western counties can be much bigger. It's not the same thing.
Yes, that has been mentioned, but it has also been mentioned that the NY counties can also be quite rural and sparsely populated. For instance, this is only about 10-15 minutes south of Syracuse: https://www.google.com/maps/@42.8920...7i13312!8i6656


Or 15-20 minutes south of Rochester: https://www.google.com/maps/@43.0023...7i13312!8i6656


So, some Northeastern counties can become thinly populated quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 02:01 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,843,744 times
Reputation: 8651
So we're on the same page...metro boundaries are basically irrelevant regarding density etc, because they include much that's outside any developed area, particularly in the West where counties tend to be bigger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 04:10 PM
 
93,164 posts, read 123,754,884 times
Reputation: 18252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
So we're on the same page...metro boundaries are basically irrelevant regarding density etc, because they include much that's outside any developed area, particularly in the West where counties tend to be bigger.
Well, the original post was about population, not density. So, I was giving information showing what the comparison actually is.

Also, the information shows how comparisons may or may not be apples to oranges. In this case, the comparison isn't too far apart, but it also illustrates land size differences in regards to metro areas.

Keep in mind that the NY combination isn't continuous, as the Syracuse and Rochester metros are separated by a county/micro area.

What I also think is that people may underestimate the NY metros in terms of population due to the narrative about the population of "Rust Belt"/Upstate NY areas. This is where land area can be important, given the size difference in this regard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2017, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,093,890 times
Reputation: 2312
Cowlitz County, Washington and its roughly 100,000 residents could eventually be lumped into Portland's MSA.

A huge casino was built in Clark County, Washington, on the edge of Cowlitz county. If the casino and subsequent added economic development around the casino creates jobs that are filled by Cowlitz County residents, the resulting commutes may add Cowlitz to the Portland-Hillsboro-Vancouver metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top