Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Better urban suburbs?
DC 42 39.25%
Boston 65 60.75%
Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Middlesex County, MA
397 posts, read 318,988 times
Reputation: 490

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdivola View Post
DC and Boston are both relatively small cities with urbanized suburbs. DC's big 4 are Bethesda, Silver Spring, Arlington and Alexandria. Boston's big 4 are Chelsea, Somerville, Cambridge, and Brookline. DC's (with the exception of Alexandria) tend to be newer street car suburbs with modern development around the metro stations, Boston's are more traditionally urban and consistently dense (triple deckers/apt buildings/row houses), but don't have as much high rise TOD development (with the exception of Kendal Sq).

Which to people think are more interesting/vibrant/walkable?
How is Chelsea part of the "big 4"? Newton borders Boston, has a considerably bigger population, and is MUCH nicer. I'm originally from Boston and Chelsea is an afterthought at best. No offense, but by including freaking Chelsea instead of Newton, you really did Boston a disservice.

Anyway, I've lived in Cambridge, Somerville, and Brookline. I prefer Cambridge, but they all have their good qualities. I mostly grew up in Cambridge, also spent a lot of time living in Somerville. I lived in Brookline for a year or two in my late-teens, early 20s. Brookline had a nice central location and neighborhoods and all, but culturally it was a little different with such a large Jewish population compared to Somerville and Cambridge.

I've also lived in Arlington and Alexandria. I prefer Arlington. I actually had a much bigger and better place in Alexandria, but still preferred Arlington. My place in Arlington was in a better neighborhood closer to the city. Not that the place in Alexandria was in a bad neighborhood, it was just comparatively worse.

I liked living in Arlington and Alexandria, but Cambridge and Somerville feel like home, and Brookline is really nice for the most part. So I'd rate Boston suburbs as higher than D.C. suburbs, especially when you include Newton instead of freaking Chelsea (sorry).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:14 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
This only makes sense if you’re the kind of suburbanite who refers to everything within city limits as “downtown”. Those areas look and feel nothing like Downtown Crossing.
I'm most familiar with Cambridge and there's absolutely no way I'd ever confuse it with Downtown Crossing...like, ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:23 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Brooklyn is quite literally part of NYC.
i disagree that that just because a city is annexed by another city automatically makes it urban; the same way that just because a city breaks off from another city automatically turns it suburban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:33 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanley-88888888 View Post
i was gonna' post ths stats for the d.c. cities as well but there seems to be no consensus of their borders (aside from alexandria). the other three have no municipal boundary; no police department; school department; ...

everything surrounding boston (massachusetts ?) is either a city or a town.
is there a list of the municipalities that share a border with washington, d.c.
from wikipedia:
Quote:
Boston is surrounded by the "Greater Boston" region and is contiguously bordered by the cities and towns of Winthrop, Revere, Chelsea, Everett, Somerville, Cambridge, Watertown, Newton, Brookline, Needham, Dedham, Canton, Milton, and Quincy.
the d.c. list seems much more nebulous:
Quote:
The District is bordered by Montgomery County, Maryland, to the northwest; Prince George's County, Maryland, to the east; and Arlington and Alexandria, Virginia, to the south and west.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:36 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
This only makes sense if you’re the kind of suburbanite who refers to everything within city limits as “downtown”. Those areas look and feel nothing like Downtown Crossing.
yeah, when we would go shopping downtown, we would go to filines; not assembly square.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 01:41 PM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Rose View Post
How is Chelsea part of the "big 4"? Newton borders Boston, has a considerably bigger population, and is MUCH nicer. I'm originally from Boston and Chelsea is an afterthought at best. No offense, but by including freaking Chelsea instead of Newton, you really did Boston a disservice.

Anyway, I've lived in Cambridge, Somerville, and Brookline. I prefer Cambridge, but they all have their good qualities. I mostly grew up in Cambridge, also spent a lot of time living in Somerville. I lived in Brookline for a year or two in my late-teens, early 20s. Brookline had a nice central location and neighborhoods and all, but culturally it was a little different with such a large Jewish population compared to Somerville and Cambridge.

I've also lived in Arlington and Alexandria. I prefer Arlington. I actually had a much bigger and better place in Alexandria, but still preferred Arlington. My place in Arlington was in a better neighborhood closer to the city. Not that the place in Alexandria was in a bad neighborhood, it was just comparatively worse.

I liked living in Arlington and Alexandria, but Cambridge and Somerville feel like home, and Brookline is really nice for the most part. So I'd rate Boston suburbs as higher than D.C. suburbs, especially when you include Newton instead of freaking Chelsea (sorry).
care to comment here too:
//www.city-data.com/forum/bosto...divisions.html

all:
also a similar poll:
//www.city-data.com/forum/city-...city-less.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2017, 11:28 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,128 posts, read 39,337,475 times
Reputation: 21202
As other people have noticed, the dense urban districts in DC suburbs are often retail and job centers that can be a pretty good distance from downtown DC while those being discussed for Boston urban suburbs are much more closer to downtown Boston and the ones as far out as DC's don't seem to have the comparably large retail and job centers. I think a lot of that has to do with the way transit further out from the respective core downtowns favors DC's suburbs a bit with these places getting frequent service even quite a distance out with good connections to rail lines that also have frequent service which allows larger job and retail centers to develop since commuters and intraregional visitors over a larger shed can get to them fairly easily.

This site shows same scale spread of their rapid transit systems and there's a significant difference between the two. Boston's system does have an additional light rail system, that doesn't go far out into the metro and is relatively slow. Boston also has a much larger commuter rail system, but that is both pretty infrequent and incredibly disjointed where there's a large system serving the north and an even larger system serving the west and south, but requiring a pretty time-consuming transfer in between rather than just having them connected (a connection which would also solve the problem of peak service frequency since it solves bottlenecks in the system). It seems to me these differences in transit linkage has a decent chance of explaining some of the difference between the urban suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 04:19 AM
 
Location: Middlesex County, MA
397 posts, read 318,988 times
Reputation: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Neither Cambridge, Somerville, nor Chelsea share a land border with Boston. Two are separated by water, and the other is separated by Cambridge. They’re connected to Boston in the same way that Arlington and Alexandria are connected to DC. If we’re only comparing areas further away from the city, I’d argue the DC doesn’t have any actual urban suburbs.
Somerville shares a land border with Charlestown (Sullivan Square area) which is part of Boston. I know that for a fact. Just walk around the Sullivan Square area and you'll see signage indicating that. Cambridge also has a land border with Charlestown close by. A lot of people might not know this because it's a part of Charlestown that's isolated from the main part. Sort of the same thing with Bunker Hill Community College. It's also part of Charlestown, but it's sort of isolated and close to Somerville, Cambridge, Medford and Everett.

Last edited by John Rose; 10-29-2017 at 05:13 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 04:28 AM
 
Location: Middlesex County, MA
397 posts, read 318,988 times
Reputation: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanley-88888888 View Post
I voted for Boston. Was tempted to vote for Miami since I live in South Florida now and like it for the most part, but Boston is still my "home", I suppose. I also enjoyed living in the Washington, D.C. area for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2017, 08:13 AM
 
Location: (six-cent-dix-sept)
6,639 posts, read 4,567,370 times
Reputation: 4730
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
...
This site shows same scale spread of their rapid transit systems and there's a significant difference between the two. Boston's system does have an additional light rail system, that doesn't go far out into the metro and is relatively slow. ...
the boston map seems to be missing the green-line (multi-spur underground/street level trolley) and the silver-line (underground/street level brt).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top