More urban streetscapes excluding their respective downtowns: Los Angeles or Long Beach (bigger)

[HoustonTexas1]

More urban in terms of your typical commercial and residential streetscapes: Los Angeles proper or Long Beach? I feel like they have more in common than not...

[pwright1]

Los Angeles by far. Excluding downtown, here is Los Angeles.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/f212rn4QoqgueTAk2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/x2s422Wt68yU4Wgh1

https://photos.app.goo.gl/qpAL22nxNv6baib12

https://photos.app.goo.gl/DsPLoAbjMH4fxK6G2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/Khxo05Ti7MxRjC5p2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/6N90oh1lcogQhTZJ2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/DOqVwbU7QZfPSRko2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/jkaotJpGdJ4dbb5x1

[ajams22]

Definitely Los Angeles.

What immediately comes to mind is the Mid-Wilshire area, around Koreatown.

[2Easy]

The urban parts of LA are much more urban and much bigger than the urban parts of Long Beach. But then again the average urbanity of Long Beach is more urban than the SF Valley.

Still it has to be LA. Long Beach is similar to adjacent Wilmington, which is part of LA but not especially urban by LA standards.