Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Cities With the Highest Quality of Life in North America
New York CIty 6 4.69%
Toronto 11 8.59%
San Francisco 5 3.91%
Boston 14 10.94%
Chicago 20 15.63%
Montreal 9 7.03%
Vancouver 28 21.88%
Seattle 22 17.19%
Philadelphia 8 6.25%
Houston 5 3.91%
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2017, 08:17 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528

Advertisements

Based on:
  • Political and social environment
  • Economic environment
  • Socio-cultural environment
  • Medical and health considerations
  • Schools and education
  • Public services and transportation
  • Recreation
  • Consumer goods
  • Housing
  • Natural environment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2017, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,198,592 times
Reputation: 2637
Seattle Vancouver
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Middle America
11,097 posts, read 7,154,662 times
Reputation: 16999
It's possible that the list is missing many other possibilities. Those are large cities listed, but there are medium-sized ones too that might be considered. And the larger the city, the more likely that pollution can be a problem, which lessens quality of life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 09:45 AM
 
615 posts, read 600,163 times
Reputation: 237
From my experience, Vancouver takes it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 10:20 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,535 posts, read 24,022,219 times
Reputation: 23961
Seattle and Vancouver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 11:00 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
My choices by individual criteria are as follows:

Political and social environment: Vancouver
Economic environment: San Francisco
Socio-cultural environment: San Francisco
Medical and health considerations: Boston
Schools and education: Boston
Public services and transportation: NYC
Recreation: Chicago
Consumer goods: Chicago
Housing: Houston
Natural environment: Seattle

People might be a bit shocked when they see Chicago as my choice for recreation, but included are things like parks, usable water front, dining, comedy, music, zoos, etc. IMO, with all things considered and convenience of use, Chicago punches the strongest in North America in that category by a wide margin.

As for the rest, they're certainly debatable. Very few of these have definable metrics, with the exception of education quality (test scores) and some pretty dynamic hospital and healthcare rankings available. I considered things like per capita GDP and diversity of vertical when picking the economic environment.

Curious to see what else folks have to say, or what other cities should be considered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,552,312 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xi_Chi_Ping View Post
None of this list frankly....sorry...list is too finite
I think that is the point of the poll. Out of the choices given, choose one? or...do they want us to list what each places strength is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2017, 03:30 PM
 
Location: San Diego
591 posts, read 820,740 times
Reputation: 610
Seattle and Vancouver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2017, 07:22 AM
 
6,772 posts, read 4,518,151 times
Reputation: 6097
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Based on:
  • Political and social environment
  • Economic environment
  • Socio-cultural environment
  • Medical and health considerations
  • Schools and education
  • Public services and transportation
  • Recreation
  • Consumer goods
  • Housing
  • Natural environment
Lots wrong with this list. Focuses way too much on a metro's population size rather than the actual quality of the area. Too many key metros left out that have much better qualities of life.

Categories such as "socio-cultural environment" and "political/social environment" are completely useless considerations due to their overly subjective nature, depending on which side of the political fence you're on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2017, 07:28 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,962,857 times
Reputation: 9226
I don’t see how one can effectively evaluate quality of life without factoring in cost-of-living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top