Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2018, 10:40 PM
 
84 posts, read 112,938 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

Napa, Sonoma, Stinson beach, mt. tam, tahoe, big sur, carmel, sequoia nat park, redwood nat park, yosemite... it's so absurd how blessed the bay area is with amazing trips within 3 hours.

Is there anywhere that comes close? I can't think of one that even has half of the great getaways the bay does (literally). Seattle I think comes closest, with the North cascades, olympic nat park, san juans, eastern desert, vancouver, and the coast.

Boston, where I live atm, definitely has some good road trips, but nowhere even remotely close to the bay. Coastal maine, white mountains n.h., lake winne/squam lake, vermont, newport, cape, vineyard, nantucket are cool... but none of those are world-class in any way. Tahoe is probably a world top-10 ski destination. Napa/Sonoma is a top 10 wine region, ghost trees and mavericks are world top-10 rated surf waves, yosemite is THE no.1 rock climbing spot in the world, Sequoia has THE biggest trees in the world, U.S. 1 through big sur is regarded as a world top 10 drive. Oh, and the bay area happens to be THE biotech, software, social media, semiconductor, computer, and entrepreneurship capital of the world. So easy to be so jealous. Ahhh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2018, 11:12 PM
 
7,070 posts, read 16,747,626 times
Reputation: 3559
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgecostanza1472 View Post
Napa, Sonoma, Stinson beach, mt. tam, tahoe, big sur, carmel, sequoia nat park, redwood nat park, yosemite... it's so absurd how blessed the bay area is with amazing trips within 3 hours.

Is there anywhere that comes close? I can't think of one that even has half of the great getaways the bay does (literally). Seattle I think comes closest, with the North cascades, olympic nat park, san juans, eastern desert, vancouver, and the coast.

Boston, where I live atm, definitely has some good road trips, but nowhere even remotely close to the bay. Coastal maine, white mountains n.h., lake winne/squam lake, vermont, newport, cape, vineyard, nantucket are cool... but none of those are world-class in any way. Tahoe is probably a world top-10 ski destination. Napa/Sonoma is a top 10 wine region, ghost trees and mavericks are world top-10 rated surf waves, yosemite is THE no.1 rock climbing spot in the world, Sequoia has THE biggest trees in the world, U.S. 1 through big sur is regarded as a world top 10 drive. Oh, and the bay area happens to be THE biotech, software, social media, semiconductor, computer, and entrepreneurship capital of the world. So easy to be so jealous. Ahhh
um...anywhere on the east coast! Or even much of the midwest? lol different strokes...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2018, 11:23 PM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,874,754 times
Reputation: 8679
Seattle would also have Mt. Rainier, Victoria, Portland...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2018, 11:38 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,663,382 times
Reputation: 13635
Sequoia and Redwood National Parks are definitely more than a 3 hour drive, more like 5-6 hours. Tahoe is usually more than 3 hours with typical traffic going towards and through Sac. Yosemite and Sequoia are just as much weekend trips from SoCal as the Bay Area pretty much too.

Also I highly doubt Tahoe is Top 10 Ski destinations in the world, lot of Rocky Mountain, European, and Canadian resort areas rank ahead of it imo. The snow isn't the best and can be inconsistent. Tahoe isn't really that world class or high end either imo, maybe more so now but it still has a lot of that cheap, cheesy 50's-60ish motel/casino vibe to it.

Oh cool Mavericks, said .000001% of the population that actually partakes in it. And maybe the few thousand people that watch it IF it actually occurs once a year.

The Bay Area definitely lacks a nice, warm swimmable beach scene or destination for a day trip. SoCal can be a weekend beach trip if you're flying. Stinson, Carmel, Big Sur, etc.. while very scenic are cold AF for the most part and never swimmable. Plus I don't see how Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, Newport, etc..are any less world class than those places. If anything they are more so with all that WASPY old, blue blood money.

Napa/Sonoma, while unique to the US, are rather overrated as hell imo; scenery is pretty meh/average for the most part compared to the rest of the US 101/inland NorCal coastal corridor. Overpriced wineries and hotels; seriously who pays $300 a night for a Best Western Motel room in some dry, dusty ass valley?

Bay Area has some cool day/weekend destinations but I think they can be matched for the most part.

Also unless you're in tech making a ton of money, that industry is rather annoying and the main reason why living in the Bay Area is so difficult for a lot of people now and actually a negative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 06:33 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,966,636 times
Reputation: 9226
NYC: Philly, Baltimore, Providence, Newport, Hudson Valley, Hamptons, Catskills, Poconos and DC/Boston by train.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 07:24 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,923,142 times
Reputation: 4528
Short answer is no, not when you take into consideration the diverse topography and climate.

Boston: Portland ME, Nantucket, Lake Winnepesaukee, Burlington VT, Portsmouth NH, Newport RI, Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, Catskills, Providence, Lake Sebago, the White Mountains, best skiing east of Colorado (Killington, Stowe, Sugarbush, Jay's Peak, Sugarloaf etc.)

As for Biotech, i'd give the nod to Boston. Entrepreneurship is close. For the rest? SF is the winner. It's funny, but more and more everyday you realize that Greater Boston is the Diet Coke version of the Bay Area.. The east coast version.

EDIT: Nantucket/Martha's Vineyard aren't world class?

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/t...op-10/islands/

I don't think the cast of Seinfeld, Bill Gates, the Obamas, the Clintons, David Letterman, Tommy Hilfiger, the Farrelly Brothers, James Taylor, etc. etc. etc. would own properties there if the areas weren't world class. Step foot on Nantucket in August. 50% of tourists will be international.

Last edited by mwj119; 05-01-2018 at 07:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 07:37 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,418,669 times
Reputation: 21252
New York and Philadelphia have a lot of variety when it comes to weekend/day trips with their comparative strengths to SF being institutional, historic or urban sites and the weakness being less dramatic nature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 07:55 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,129 posts, read 7,572,838 times
Reputation: 5786
Anywhere in the mid-Atlantic could.

Chesapeake Bay, Va Beach, Ocean City/ DE beaches, Jersey shore, Shenandoah valley, Blue Ridge mountains, PA Amish country, Virginia wine vineyards, Chincoteague and Assateague pony islands, Sugarloaf Mountain Maryland, Deep Creek lake Maryland, the Poconos, Luray Caverns Virginia, Harve de Grace. And that’s not even getting started on the big cities and small towns yet.

Last edited by the resident09; 05-01-2018 at 08:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 07:58 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,170,662 times
Reputation: 14762
The whole premise of this thread's title is so arrogant that it makes me want to vomit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2018, 08:00 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,418,669 times
Reputation: 21252
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
The whole premise of this thread's title is so arrogant that it makes me want to vomit.
Why? The topographical variation near San Francisco means there are a lot of dramatic shifts in biomes from one place to another with different climates, flora, and fauna. It really does make for a lot of varied weekend trips if you're talking about non-city things.

You pay for it by having the risk of massive earthquakes though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top