Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: More impressive Transit Expansion?
Sound Transit 3 (Seattle) 13 31.71%
Measure M (Los Angeles) 28 68.29%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2018, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,882,933 times
Reputation: 3419

Advertisements

My bus today was 20 minutes late, and then proceeded to get stuck in traffic and travelled about one mile within a span of 20 minutes. Seattle’s infrastructure is an embarrassment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2018, 06:38 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatsbyGatz View Post
My bus today was 20 minutes late, and then proceeded to get stuck in traffic and travelled about one mile within a span of 20 minutes. Seattle’s infrastructure is an embarrassment.
The US’s infrastructure is an embarassment. At least Seattle and Los Angeles are trying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
I think once the Crenshaw Line connects the Purple to Expo, that'll be a game changer. The biggest game changer with that will be if Metro decides to extend the Crenshaw Line up to the Red Line through WeHo. If they decide on the route up San Vicente to Santa Monica Blvd, then turn and follow Santa Monica and connect to Hollywood/Highland, I think LA could give plenty of cities in the US a run for their money on best transit systems. It would be behind NYC for sure, but Chicago lacks a cross-town connector like the Crenshaw Line could become.
That’s something that shows on the map that I don’t think metro has funding for. Not even to the purple line unless I’m mistaken. They’re going to study it in the hopes that they get money that they hadn’t projected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,975,356 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
The US’s infrastructure is an embarassment. At least Seattle and Los Angeles are trying.
Good point. Lots of other cities are trying too. Dallas, Phoenix, houston, Charlotte,...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top