Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Better Skyline?
San Francisco 88 52.69%
Seattle 79 47.31%
Voters: 167. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2019, 09:29 AM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,874,754 times
Reputation: 8679

Advertisements

The angle matters for both. Each has flat parts and hilly parts, water on a couple sides, hills behind from some angles, etc. SF is arguably out of balance with Salesforce's height, while Seattle's Columbia Center is becoming less dominant.

I like bigger and denser cities so SF probably wins. But Seattle is catching up. That includes our second-tallest rising at a huge speed in the core CBD...watch it on the Space Needle Panocam I linked above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2019, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
The angle matters for both. Each has flat parts and hilly parts, water on a couple sides, hills behind from some angles, etc. SF is arguably out of balance with Salesforce's height, while Seattle's Columbia Center is becoming less dominant.
Yes its all about the angle.

Salesforce and 181 Fremont broke that horrible 'tabletop' effect that SFs skyline had before, it looked flat.

Quote:
I like bigger and denser cities so SF probably wins. But Seattle is catching up. That includes our second-tallest rising at a huge speed in the core CBD...watch it on the Space Needle Panocam I linked above.
What about that 1,100 footer that was proposed a while back? Any news on that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 12:01 PM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,465 posts, read 44,100,317 times
Reputation: 16861
I voted San Francisco, but it's such an interesting comparison. The two have so much in common to me.

Both are hilly West Coast metros surrounding a large inland body of water.
Both have an economy that is strongly oriented to the tech industry.
Both are in the process of creating an unimaginable amount of new wealth.
As a result, both are having difficulties keeping a lid on their runaway real estate markets.

San Francisco, for a metro of its size and stature, has the kind of skyline I would expect of it.
Seattle, for a metro of its size, has a skyline that far exceeds my expectations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 01:19 PM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,874,754 times
Reputation: 8679
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yes its all about the angle.

Salesforce and 181 Fremont broke that horrible 'tabletop' effect that SFs skyline had before, it looked flat.



What about that 1,100 footer that was proposed a while back? Any news on that?
They've filed something about their intent to continue the current master use permit application, which would otherwise sunset soon. The last plan was closer to 1,000', and it's unclear what the FAA will push for.

Another topic....general statement about "approved" as a term. Sometimes people use it to refer to the master use permit. First, approval of a master use permit doesn't mean getting the permit, as the appeal period needs to happen first, and there's other paperwork after that. Second, projects need building permits too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
They've filed something about their intent to continue the current master use permit application, which would otherwise sunset soon. The last plan was closer to 1,000', and it's unclear what the FAA will push for.
Ok thanks. Hope it gets built.

Quote:
Another topic....general statement about "approved" as a term. Sometimes people use it to refer to the master use permit. First, approval of a master use permit doesn't mean getting the permit, as the appeal period needs to happen first, and there's other paperwork after that. Second, projects need building permits too.
Ugh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 05:28 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,714,715 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Ok thanks. Hope it gets built.


Ugh
I do as well, but that one seems to be caught in process hell and I haven't heard much about it in the last year or so. The new 850 foot Rainier Square Tower should be finished by next year, though, so at least we have that going for us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 06:46 PM
 
8,865 posts, read 6,874,754 times
Reputation: 8679
Maybe the FAA process? Otherwise, it seems the developer has let it lag for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 07:17 PM
 
6,559 posts, read 12,054,379 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yes its all about the angle.

Salesforce and 181 Fremont broke that horrible 'tabletop' effect that SFs skyline had before, it looked flat.



What about that 1,100 footer that was proposed a while back? Any news on that?
Before it was always the Transamerica Pyramid that was dominant. Now the skyline is looking more like did in "Bicentennial Man".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAandATL View Post
Before it was always the Transamerica Pyramid that was dominant. Now the skyline is looking more like did in "Bicentennial Man".
Yeah you can barely make out the Transamerica Pyramid nowadays as this vid shows:
https://flic.kr/p/2ewvGQ6
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2019, 08:57 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,714,715 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Maybe the FAA process? Otherwise, it seems the developer has let it lag for a while.
I thought the FAA/city permitting were holding it up, but I could be wrong on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top