Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which Skyline Rules the Southern Skies! ( don't forget to Rank them)
Atlanta' s 57 44.88%
Houston's 40 31.50%
Dallas's 25 19.69%
Austin's 4 3.15%
It's so hard, I can't decide 1 0.79%
Voters: 127. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2019, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Flawduh
17,210 posts, read 15,412,961 times
Reputation: 23762

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobdreamz View Post
Which Skyline Rules the Southern Skies ?

Was Florida swallowed up by the sea?

I'm going to assume you're thinking about Miami? Is so, my personal opinion: It's very big, but also very bland. But yes, it definitely SHOULD be in this conversation, unless we're excluding Florida for whatever reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2019, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,733 posts, read 1,897,707 times
Reputation: 1594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcenal352 View Post
I'm going to assume you're thinking about Miami? Is so, my personal opinion: It's very big, but also very bland. But yes, it definitely SHOULD be in this conversation, unless we're excluding Florida for whatever reason.
Well I don't think it's going to be Fair to the other cities,

https://www.city-data.com/forum/city-...anked-add.html

But Show us what you got
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,186 posts, read 1,513,326 times
Reputation: 1342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
1Atlanta
2Houston
3Dallas



4Austin
+1

It’s the most distinct and beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,186 posts, read 1,513,326 times
Reputation: 1342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcenal352 View Post
I'm going to assume you're thinking about Miami? Is so, my personal opinion: It's very big, but also very bland. But yes, it definitely SHOULD be in this conversation, unless we're excluding Florida for whatever reason.
You must want a blowout? Which is exactly what would have happened if Miami was added.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 06:38 PM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 5 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,466 posts, read 44,108,506 times
Reputation: 16866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcenal352 View Post
I'm going to assume you're thinking about Miami? Is so, my personal opinion: It's very big, but also very bland. But yes, it definitely SHOULD be in this conversation, unless we're excluding Florida for whatever reason.
Arquitectonica built some pretty exciting stuff in Miami during the 80's.









https://www.google.com/search?biw=13...YIKigA#imgrc=_
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,697 posts, read 9,952,165 times
Reputation: 3454
From reddit

Taken on the Hampton Rd bridge over I-30, looking towards Downtown (5 mins from Downtown). Here’s the actual location on Google Maps.

https://goo.gl/maps/jv1NZWbaA8vvCjVQA


Credit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Dallas/comm...term=control_1
Attached Thumbnails
Dallas Houston Atlanta Skyline RANKED! (add austin)-02dfa39c-543f-4c0c-9d32-6385988bdc2e.jpeg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,307,587 times
Reputation: 3827
Atlanta and Dallas have beautiful skylines during the day and especially at night. Austin has a very modern skyline which is cool and Houston is literally a beast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 07:37 PM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,360,306 times
Reputation: 2742
DFW for the imaginative lighting of its buildings downtown, the Art Deco look of the State Fairgrounds, and development in Uptown and White Rock Lake to the northeast. Dallas is hurt but it also have Fort Worth nearby with its skyline that the others don't and to a lesser extent new development in Plano were a number of Fortune 500 companies have offices. Two new hi-rises are opening up there this year.

Houston's downtown was dead with development for most of the 1ate 1980s until the turn of the century but adding the Astros Park, Toyota Arena, the MLS stadium and additional towers on Main street and more towers to Houston Center on the east side added balance that didn't exist. Similar to some extent to D/FW, the Galleria/Uptown area is a second hub of competing elevated architecture, heading west on the I-10 energy corridor but that area is more bland. The Texas Medical Center south of Downtown seems to always try to be creative with signature building designs with medical themes.

Austin's waterfront, the rose stone color state capital building and the Uof Texas Tower (especially, when bathed in Burnt Orange) was always a great look. When visiting, I always like to drive on the upper deck of I -35 to take in the view. Now with several new towers over 500 ft high and really have given ATX a feel that makes me think of much larger metro area. Also, the redevelopment of the Mueller airport site while not known for very tall buildings has been a great success as a mixed use development close by downtown.


Atlanta's cityscape in terms of height has really been concentrated in Buckhead/northside of Midtown with some really nice additions. I don't recall anything in the last ten years up by Perimeter Mall but the King and Queen towers were always a great idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 07:42 PM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,360,306 times
Reputation: 2742
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigerianNightmare View Post
While Skyscrapers definitely look better in the other thee, I've never once found Dallas's lighting scheme to be cool. I maybe just a pessimist when it comes to Skyscrapers but my first thought is how much it must cost to keep changing the lights. I've never seen them on a holiday though and they look a lot better as a uniform holiday themed color. When I saw them all the buildings where a different color.

For me nighttime Houston looks better, daytime Dallas has much more interesting building design and no weird lights on the buildings. Austin while smaller is one of the best looking skylines just because each building just looks so nice. I can' rate Atlanta as I haven't seen enough.
Lighting for the Bank of America tower is green probably 90% of the time with color changes on special occasions. Its been around since the mid-80s. Not that costly. One factual tidbit. Lighting a building using the gas like that, argon, could not happened in cold climates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2019, 08:22 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,980,539 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScrappyJoe View Post
Architecturally, Austin is the only city here that stands out, simply because a larger percentage of its towers are of 21st century build.
Which also means its skyline lacks architectural diversity compared to the others.

Quote:
Unless you're hanging the hat on TWD promos and a spire or two, Atlanta's buildings aren't anymore distinctive than what is present in Dallas or Houston.
I disagree although I know it's a matter of perspective. Atlanta has quite a few towers with decorative crowns/spires/fins that stand out, not just two. Any objective observer would agree with that:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...m_Buckhead.jpg
https://www.123rf.com/photo_92920595...n-autumn-.html

Of the ten tallest towers in Atlanta, only one is a plain box; the others are distinct either in terms of their tops or shapes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ngs_in_Atlanta

Of course I'm not arguing that Houston and Dallas don't have towers like that because they do. But for Houston in particular, many of its towers are bulky so that's how its skyline comes across to me; also many of the facades are monotonous. It has more mass/heft than Atlanta's skyline whereas Atlanta's individual towers are more sleek and their proportions make their tops and shapes stand out more in the skyline, and their facades tend to have more variation. It makes sense when you realize that most of Houston's tallest towers were built in the 70s/early 80s while most of Atlanta's were built in the late 80s onward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top