Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Though I sometimes wonder about KodeBlue's penchant for bringing Baltimore into every conversation, this time he is totally on the mark. What Baltimore lacks in terms of truly tall buildings, it makes up for by packing medium sized buildings cheek to jowl. Of course, DC packs its shorter buildings even tighter. But, since there isn't much in the way of sky, there isn't much of a DC skyline.
I only bring up Baltimore to show it in a positive light. We get/see enough negativity around here.
I only bring up Baltimore to show it in a positive light. We get/see enough negativity around here.
Does this count as a thread where you randomly bring up BMore? Even the poster you replied to brought up your "penchant" to constantly bring up BMore...
Does this count as a thread where you randomly bring up BMore? Even the poster you replied to brought up your "penchant" to constantly bring up BMore...
No, it does not. I bring Baltimore up only where applicable, and it is applicable in this instance
The elevation rise from the waterfront makes Seattle's skyline look much more dense and impressive than if it had been on flat land, so that's why it got my vote. From street level the East Coast cities are ahead, but Seattle is catching up.
Boston is already very dense and extensive and its built environment is growing rapidly. It's much closer to SF than Baltimore.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.