Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So I can’t help but notice that the Midwest cities have been mostly excluded. Only Detroit and Minneapolis are listed. What happened to Chicago, KC, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Cleveland, St. Louis, Indy, Columbus, etc? All of those cities have denser skylines than Charlotte. What kind of worthwhile discussion can this list hope to have when so many cities are missing?
So I can’t help but notice that the Midwest cities have been mostly excluded. Only Detroit and Minneapolis are listed. What happened to Chicago, KC, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Cleveland, St. Louis, Indy, Columbus, etc? All of those cities have denser skylines than Charlotte. What kind of worthwhile discussion can this list hope to have when so many cities are missing?
Read the first post, with regards to Chicago.
The rest on your list do not really have impressive SKYLINES.
Read the first post, with regards to Chicago.
The rest on your list do not really have impressive SKYLINES.
I totally disagree, and those cities I mentioned have far more dense skylines than most of the sunbelt cities. The poll obviously intentionally excludes the Midwest.
I totally disagree, and those cities I mentioned have far more dense skylines than most of the sunbelt cities. The poll obviously intentionally excludes the Midwest.
I totally disagree, and those cities I mentioned have far more dense skylines than most of the sunbelt cities. The poll obviously intentionally excludes the Midwest.
No. You can't tell me with a straight face that Milwaukee has a better or denser skyline than Charlotte. I do think KC's is pretty nice and should be on the list. But no to Milwaukee, Cleveland, Columbus.
Of your candidates listed, I would have to go with LA. Not only has it exploded in the last 20 years, high-rises, esp apt/condo towers, are flying up by the week, it seems. LA's skyline is very impressive.
No. You can't tell me with a straight face that Milwaukee has a better or denser skyline than Charlotte. I do think KC's is pretty nice and should be on the list. But no to Milwaukee, Cleveland, Columbus.
I love my hometown of Cleveland as one of the most underrated, unrealized/unknown/overlooked treasures among American mid-sized cities... but its skyline is not its strong suit. There are some nice buildings there, like classic Terminal Tower and very the very impressive, very iconic Key Center, but Cleveland's problems is there's not a lot of skyline density -- our nice buildings seem spaced out and there's a kind of saw-tooth nature to the skyline...
I know Milwaukee outpaces Cleveland, skyline-wise, and from the photos I've seen, KC likely does, too.
... Columbus, ... no.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
