Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Since 2010, which US cities have seen their skylines dramatically improved with heigh, density, and
Boston 10 6.41%
New York City 42 26.92%
Chicago 9 5.77%
Charlotte 12 7.69%
Atlanta 12 7.69%
Nashville 33 21.15%
Detroit 0 0%
Dallas 3 1.92%
Houston 3 1.92%
Austin 63 40.38%
Denver 5 3.21%
Las Vegas 1 0.64%
Phoenix 2 1.28%
San Diego 0 0%
Los Angeles 14 8.97%
Seattle 55 35.26%
San Francisco 27 17.31%
Portland, OR 1 0.64%
Miami 27 17.31%
Baltimore 2 1.28%
Philadelphia 19 12.18%
Washington, DC 3 1.92%
Columbus 0 0%
Kansas City 1 0.64%
Minneapolis 3 1.92%
Milwaukee 1 0.64%
Raleigh 2 1.28%
Orlando 0 0%
Oklahoma City 3 1.92%
Other City (list) 3 1.92%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2019, 09:11 AM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666

Advertisements

I've never seen a crane count for Miami. It wouldn't surprise me if it beat Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2019, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,726 posts, read 6,724,376 times
Reputation: 7580
LA would be more noticeable if it stopped building in Century City, and along Wilshire, and put everything downtown. In spite of all the new towers, the downtown skyline still looks like it has gaps when you look at it from West Hollywood or Griffith Observatory.

San Francisco is really noticeable on the Bay Bridge or ferry approaches.

The 10 tallest in Dallas were all built before 1990, 10 tallest in Austin all built since 2000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,527 posts, read 2,320,333 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
I've never seen a crane count for Miami. It wouldn't surprise me if it beat Seattle.

Q2 2019 crane stats had it like this...

Los Angeles/Seattle where tied for 1st place at 49 cranes a piece.
Portland - 30
DC - 28
NYC/Chicago - 27

Miami's booms are cycles... it's slightly cooled off, but there are a lot of proposed/planned developments that are in their final stages before breaking ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Flawduh
17,155 posts, read 15,373,458 times
Reputation: 23738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
Q2 2019 crane stats had it like this...

Los Angeles/Seattle where tied for 1st place at 49 cranes a piece.
Portland - 30
DC - 28
NYC/Chicago - 27

Miami's booms are cycles... it's slightly cooled off, but there are a lot of proposed/planned developments that are in their final stages before breaking ground.
Where are you getting this? NYC has MUCH more than 27 cranes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,527 posts, read 2,320,333 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcenal352 View Post
Where are you getting this? NYC has MUCH more than 27 cranes.
https://www.constructiondive.com/new...2-2019/558835/

Granted this was back in July
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 09:50 AM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
I don't trust the RLB crane stats at all. They appear to count only certain types of tower cranes. Much of NYC's construction uses short-jib cranes they might not count (??). And they skip Miami.

My city tops the list every year, several of which at any given time are my employer. I'm arguing against my own city here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,527 posts, read 2,320,333 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
I don't trust the RLB crane stats at all. They appear to count only certain types of tower cranes. Much of NYC's construction uses short-jib cranes they might not count (??). And they skip Miami.

My city tops the list every year, several of which at any given time are my employer. I'm arguing against my own city here.
I think it only counts Tower Cranes, and I still haven't found any Miami crane counts

I agree these metrics are not accurate at all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 10:37 AM
 
1,798 posts, read 1,122,644 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
I think it only counts Tower Cranes, and I still haven't found any Miami crane counts

I agree these metrics are not accurate at all
Yeah the comparison is not accurate and partially useless because it only looks at "13 major cities across the U.S. and Canada":
Austin, Boston, Calgary, Chicago, Denver, Honolulu, Los Angeles, New York, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, Toronto, and Washington, D.C.
I remember a few years back when San Diego had its own boom--at least double the number of cranes reported than Phoenix or Portland--but wasn't mentioned. I delved a little deeper and realized the comparison is incomplete. Most annoyingly, Miami isn't included too.

They only examine cities they operate in, if I remember correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Flawduh
17,155 posts, read 15,373,458 times
Reputation: 23738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
Gotcha... I'm just questioning this, partly due to my personal experience in NYC a few months ago. Between Midtown and Downtown Manhattan, Downtown Brooklyn, and Long Island City, I find the 27 count to be particularly questionable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2019, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
1,507 posts, read 3,411,423 times
Reputation: 1527
Default Crane counts are not accurate!!!

I JUST DISCOVERED WHY THE CRANE COUNTS DONT MAKE ANY SENSE. IT IS BECAUSE RLB ONLY TRACKS 13 METRO AREAS.
Yes, New York City has more active cranes than Seattle so do a few other cities. But RLB does not track those cities so they are not included in the list.

Houston has at least 50 cranes operating right now. I dont understand how the cranes are counted??????


Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcenal352 View Post
Where are you getting this? NYC has MUCH more than 27 cranes.

Last edited by jd433; 11-26-2019 at 01:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top