Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Since 2010, which US cities have seen their skylines dramatically improved with heigh, density, and
Boston 10 6.41%
New York City 42 26.92%
Chicago 9 5.77%
Charlotte 12 7.69%
Atlanta 12 7.69%
Nashville 33 21.15%
Detroit 0 0%
Dallas 3 1.92%
Houston 3 1.92%
Austin 63 40.38%
Denver 5 3.21%
Las Vegas 1 0.64%
Phoenix 2 1.28%
San Diego 0 0%
Los Angeles 14 8.97%
Seattle 55 35.26%
San Francisco 27 17.31%
Portland, OR 1 0.64%
Miami 27 17.31%
Baltimore 2 1.28%
Philadelphia 19 12.18%
Washington, DC 3 1.92%
Columbus 0 0%
Kansas City 1 0.64%
Minneapolis 3 1.92%
Milwaukee 1 0.64%
Raleigh 2 1.28%
Orlando 0 0%
Oklahoma City 3 1.92%
Other City (list) 3 1.92%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2019, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,298,309 times
Reputation: 3827

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMatl View Post
Then you had blinders on. Seattle makes Dallas look like Podunk in comparison.
Umm... not quite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2019, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,679 posts, read 9,380,908 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
Umm... not quite.
Dallas has not changed as much. It looks smaller than its metro suggests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Richardson
355 posts, read 468,947 times
Reputation: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Dallas has not changed as much. It looks smaller than its metro suggests.
Dallas changed a ton on the ground-level, but I agree with you. The 1980's trophy towers still dominate our skyline and it looks somewhat dated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,298,309 times
Reputation: 3827
Regardless of amounts of growth. Seattle does not make Dallas look “podunk”. That’s so ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 03:31 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,732,946 times
Reputation: 17393
Isn't Philadelphia the only city to add a "supertall" this decade?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,298,309 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by craziaskowboi View Post
isn't philadelphia the only city to add a "supertall" this decade?
la, sf, ny...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 03:53 PM
 
22 posts, read 9,435 times
Reputation: 42
I voted for Austin, but NYC deserves a shoutout for making noticeable changes in its mega-dense urban footprint. That is not easy to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 04:20 PM
 
1,798 posts, read 1,121,815 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
To provide some context, this is from Skyscraperpage.com. It is probably missing buildings for every city, but it’s the only comprehensive source we have for context. Does anybody know what these counts were in 2010?

They define high-rise as 12 stories+ I believe:

City................. ....High-rises......Land Area

1. New York City........6034.........303 sq. miles
2. Chicago.................1208.........228 sq. miles
3. Los Angeles.............563.........469 sq. miles
4. Houston..................494..........600 sq. miles
5. Washington, DC.......492...........61 sq. miles
6. Honolulu..................465..........60 sq. miles
7. San Francisco...........453..........47 sq. miles
8. Philadelphia..............385.........134 sq. miles
9. Boston.....................351.........48 sq. miles
10. Miami....................348..........36 sq. miles
11. Dallas....................316..........340 sq. miles
12. Denver..................304..........155 sq. miles
13. Atlanta..................290..........133 sq. miles
14. Seattle...................259..........84 sq. miles
15. Arlington Va............226..........26 sq. miles
16. Minneapolis............201...........57 sq. miles
17. Detroit...................191..........139 sq. miles
18. Baltimore..............175...........81 sq. miles
19. Las Vegas..............172..........136 sq. miles
20. San Diego...............162..........325 sq. miles
21. Miami Beach............159..........8 sq. miles
22. Pittsburgh...............158..........55 sq. miles
23. Portland..................153..........133 sq. miles
24. Fort Lauderdale........149..........35 sq. miles
25. Austin.....................148..........298 sq. miles

Source: skyscraperpage.com
Did a quick scan of the San Diego list and can confirm the page has very unreliable information. It lists only 6 high rises being built from 2016 onwards for San Diego, which is completely wrong.

Just to show you how inaccurate/outdated it is, the list below represents only the missing high-rise buildings within three blocks to the east and south of the central library:
  • Park 12 (2018): 402 ft
  • Spire (2019): 479 ft
  • Alexan (2017): 220 ft
  • Shift (2018): 240 ft
  • K1 (2019): 300 ft
  • Shift (2018): 253

There are also 2-4 missing buildings within a 2-block radius of UTC mall.

This total (181) on Emporis.com appears more accurate: https://www.emporis.com/city/101033/...atus/existing/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Flawduh
17,148 posts, read 15,357,409 times
Reputation: 23727
Quote:
Originally Posted by newgensandiego View Post
Did a quick scan of the San Diego list and can confirm the page has very unreliable information. It lists only 6 high rises being built from 2016 onwards for San Diego, which is completely wrong.

Just to show you how inaccurate/outdated it is, the list below represents only the missing high-rise buildings within three blocks to the east and south of the central library:
  • Park 12 (2018): 402 ft
  • Spire (2019): 479 ft
  • Alexan (2017): 220 ft
  • Shift (2018): 240 ft
  • K1 (2019): 300 ft
  • Shift (2018): 253

There are also 2-4 missing buildings within a 2-block radius of UTC mall.

This total (181) on Emporis.com appears more accurate: https://www.emporis.com/city/101033/...atus/existing/
Of those 181, I counted 17 mast/towers. I may have missed one or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2019, 06:32 PM
 
96 posts, read 58,318 times
Reputation: 278
Maybe its skyline is not the most impressive in terms of height or density, but Milwaukee's has certainly improved dramatically since 2010 with construction of the (current) 2nd, 8th and 11th tallest buildings (Northwestern Mutual, 7Seventy7 and the Moderne) and the new 12th tallest building (BMO Harris Financial Center at Market Square) nearing completion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top