Small to Mid-Sized City/Metro Surrounded by Most Natural Beauty (better, people)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Looks like the Sea-Tac area is the front-runner for naturally beautiful areas in the U.S. (as far as large cities go), but what about slightly smaller cities and mid-sized metro areas not anchored by large cities? Which of these would you consider naturally beautiful?
Feel free to post tons of pictures, since who doesn't enjoy some nice scenery?
This poll is confusing. There are several that could be contenders and will depend on the preference for ocean vs mountains etc. But many of the choices aren't scenic at all. So what is the point of including them in the poll.
yeah, almost nothing on that list has anything noteworthy as far as natural beauty aside from some of them being near the beach. I guess, Harrisburg may be decent because the river and not far from mountains but...ehh...there's way better choices out there.
Probably Bellingham, Olympia, Santa Cruz, Santa Barbara. Hard to beat ocean, mountains, and volcanoes. I'm sure you could make a case for others though, everywhere has its charm
Lol at Greeley where I went to high school. Not even close.
I champion Duluth, MN as it is in such an excellent area for nature and outdoors. The winter and junky employment scene will always keep it from being “discovered”.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.