Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which metro is more liveable for families?
Metro Boston 44 41.90%
Metro Chicago 61 58.10%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2020, 02:44 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
Boston is a magnet for young adults from , yes, VT/NH/ME. Going south, it gets some from RI, but CT is another story. Chicago is a magnet for all of the Midwest ( albeit a bit less when west of Des Moines, and Minnesotans tend to just stay in MSP). Big 10 grads ( or whatever the conference is calling itself now) from Ohio State, Michigan and Wisconsin absolutely flood the city. All midwestern roads lead to Chicago.
I made mention of the neighborly, "kick the can", block party environment in so many Chicagoland suburbs.

I absolutely think there is a link between Chicago suburbs and the Big 10/State school draw. There is absolutely something to what you're saying. It is not at all uncommon, at least in the predominantly white collar suburbs of Chicago, to have folks that grew up in Cleveland, Detroit, Dayton, Indianapolis, and Wisconsin living in the same neighborhood and flying their Big 10 flags. It's actually pretty cool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2020, 02:45 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
lol aaaah reminiscent of my college days in Allston
Tavern In The Square brunch, anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 02:49 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by iAMtheVVALRUS View Post
Honest question: what suburban amenities does Chicago have that Boston lacks?
Convenience, if you'd call that an amenity. There's more of everything, and often closer. Chicago communities maintain density- commercial and residential- far further than Boston suburbs. 95 towns in Boston, if it were like Illinois, would be as dense as Newton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 02:53 PM
 
1,393 posts, read 861,166 times
Reputation: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
Of course, I get that. I am not the one who started talking about skiing...that was a Boston argument thing. It's gone on for so long, I figured if people really wanted skiing, they should know that other states offer better options, than one gets in the Boston area.
I would go to Colorado..What’s interesting is that Chicago beats Boston in many areas but actually isn’t “best†at virtually anything. If o wanted the best of theatre, finance, tech, food, education, medicine, research, outdoor recreation you name it..I wouldn’t end up in Chicago
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,808 posts, read 6,045,258 times
Reputation: 5252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Convenience, if you'd call that an amenity. There's more of everything, and often closer. Chicago communities maintain density- commercial and residential- far further than Boston suburbs. 95 towns in Boston, if it were like Illinois, would be as dense as Newton.
So take me, currently living in the Merrimack Valley. What am I missing that I would have in a similar suburb ~1hr outside of Chicago.

Most suburbs I’ve been to have all had the same kind of things in them. Even Newton doesn’t have anything that stands out to me besides subway access and good schools, and plenty of towns have the latter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 03:08 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
I love those tidy brick homes on small lots. Love them.
It's actually funny, if you continue to head in the same direction in the second/residential neighborhood link, you run into Park Ridge. Check out the immediate difference in homes/lots/trees. I love Park Ridge.

https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0006...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0064...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 03:21 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by iAMtheVVALRUS View Post
So take me, currently living in the Merrimack Valley. What am I missing that I would have in a similar suburb ~1hr outside of Chicago.

Most suburbs I’ve been to have all had the same kind of things in them. Even Newton doesn’t have anything that stands out to me besides subway access and good schools, and plenty of towns have the latter.
Well Newton has 13 separate villages, many of which have their own main street/square, which gives it a considerable amount of walkability. But, Newton is an anomaly in this way, and functions more like Evanston in Illinois.

Deerfield, IL sits 25 miles north of the city, inland from the water. So, let's choose Deerfield and Andover. Median income is about the same, a tad higher in Andover. Median SFH home in Andover is just shy of $700k, while in Deerfield, it's around $400k. (!!!!!)

Both have nice downtowns, though Andover's is nicer, which I generally find to be the case in MA.

However, downtown Deerfield is 1.5 miles to a major mall- Northbrook Court. It is 7 miles to the Glen (think Assemble Square). Deerfield hosts more commercial space within the confines of the town, including Walgreens, Takeda (now moving to Cambridge, MA), Baxter, Mondelez, AIM, Randstad. Also, Kraft, and Allstate are only a few miles south.

Furthermore, Deerfield has a population density of 3,400 psqmi, and a total land area of 5.6 miles. So, you can literally walk/bike to downtown, or other commercial activity, from almost anywhere. In Andover, you have an outpost for Raytheon, Philips, and small offices for Putnam, and Pfizer. Andover has the land area of 32 sqmi, giving it a population density of 1000. Unless you live directly off of downtown, which is tough on the wallet, you're not walking anywhere, including the train. 114 gives you the added bonus of some daily shopping and a few restaurants, but it's nothing like Northbrook court or the other commercial areas in Deerfield. To put it into perspective, in the way of driving, you'd have to drive 7.6 miles from downtown Andover to get to a Target. In Deerfield, you have 3+ within 5.5 miles, two major shopping malls/districts, and several town cores including Northbrook, Glenview, and Highland park.

So, quite literally, you'd have 3-4x the sheer amount of "stuff" in and around Deerfield, which is similarly situated in IL as Andover is in MA.

You can use this same type of equation, over, and over, and over again across the two metros.

Last edited by mwj119; 01-15-2020 at 03:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 03:31 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,890,394 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
It's actually funny, if you continue to head in the same direction in the second/residential neighborhood link, you run into Park Ridge. Check out the immediate difference in homes/lots/trees. I love Park Ridge.

https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0006...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@42.0064...7i16384!8i8192
A beautiful suburb...not even one of the "top", but, still, very lovely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 03:38 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,918,842 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
A beautiful suburb...not even one of the "top", but, still, very lovely.
Confuses the heck out of me why it's not top tier, though. It has a bit more socioeconomic diversity in its schools, so the schools don't have the same test score output as a Wilmette, or a Western Springs.

But from a looks perspective, and a convenience perspective, there are few suburbs as nice and as nicely situated as Park Ridge. And Park Ridge's downtown/uptown is amongst my favorite in Chicagoland. It doesn't rival an Elmhurst or Arlington Heights in volume, but it's certainly more charming. To me, it's a nicer La Grange. Park Ridge lifted the "dry" status a few years back, and the area has exploded with a new little restaurant/bar scene that really makes it feel like a nicer, cleaner extension of Edison Park.

The housing stock and tree canopy has a look and feel that mirrors the pre WWII areas that hug the lake in the North Shore of Chicago, as well as the towns north of Milwaukee.. Whitefish Bay, Shorewood. Kind of like Wilmette, but he snootiness (and without the brick/paver roads east of downtown).

Last edited by mwj119; 01-15-2020 at 03:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2020, 03:50 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,890,394 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Confuses the heck out of me why it's not top tier, though. It has a bit more socioeconomic diversity in its schools, so the schools don't have the same test score output as a Wilmette, or a Western Springs.

But from a looks perspective, and a convenience perspective, there are few suburbs as nice and as nicely situated as Park Ridge. And Park Ridge's downtown/uptown is amongst my favorite in Chicagoland. It doesn't rival an Elmhurst or Arlington Heights in volume, but it's certainly more charming. To me, it's a nicer La Grange. Park Ridge lifted the "dry" status a few years back, and the area has exploded with a new little restaurant/bar scene that really makes it feel like a nicer, cleaner extension of Edison Park.

The housing stock and tree canopy has a look and feel that mirrors the pre WWII areas that hug the lake in the North Shore of Chicago, as well as the towns north of Milwaukee.. Whitefish Bay, Shorewood. Kind of like Wilmette, but he snootiness (and without the brick/paver roads east of downtown).
All good points. I love Park Ridge, and it's tree canopy. Also, the beauty of Whitefish Bay, Shorewood, and Fox Point in Milwaukee, is completely unknown to almost everyone outside of Milwaukee. Glad you're aware, because they are amazing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top