Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
Cincinnati, OH 63 46.32%
St. Louis, MO 29 21.32%
Milwaukee, WI 44 32.35%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 05-16-2020, 10:30 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,135 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217

Advertisements

Cities would be better served if there were multiple viable parties, since policies don’t cut neatly into two sides, and there was a process of governing via coalitions. One party dominating can be stasis in continuing the same policies without meaningful adaptation while being “purple” might just end up being so antagonistic that little gets done or things get done and then swiftly undone if things flip out of little more than political spite.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2020, 01:44 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by STLgasm View Post
Milwaukee may be in the bluest state of the three, but St. Louis is the bluest city out of the three, by far.
While that may be true, state level politics are more important to the livelihoods of the people. Wisconsin wasn't about to be the only state without a Planned Parenthood or similar entity. Just one example of how a state government is more influential than a local city government. I believe also though that MO was one of the states that banned municipalities from increasing minimum wages and doing similar things at the local level? It's a similar problem in Louisville. It's quite a progressive city, but the state refuses to let it do anything to better itself like banning plastic bag bans and banning minimum wage hikes and banning taxes for bettering public transit and things like that.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2020, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,681 posts, read 9,390,397 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Cities would be better served if there were multiple viable parties, since policies don’t cut neatly into two sides, and there was a process of governing via coalitions. One party dominating can be stasis in continuing the same policies without meaningful adaptation while being “purple” might just end up being so antagonistic that little gets done or things get done and then swiftly undone if things flip out of little more than political spite.
I think that is very true. You are damned if you do and damned if you don't regarding politics. An interesting research study could show how blue cities in red states have been hurt by politics and possibly visa versa. It would also be interesting to see how fairly moderate cities have faired as well. Cincinnati leans blue, but the culture is noticeably more conservative than my hometown. Some cities are outwardly conservative but score high on progressive metrics (HRC MEI, Infrastructure, Land Use/Conservation/Green Space, Diversity/Inclusion etc.).
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2020, 05:06 PM
 
7,108 posts, read 8,966,855 times
Reputation: 6415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
I think that is very true. You are damned if you do and damned if you don't regarding politics. An interesting research study could show how blue cities in red states have been hurt by politics and possibly visa versa. It would also be interesting to see how fairly moderate cities have faired as well. Cincinnati leans blue, but the culture is noticeably more conservative than my hometown. Some cities are outwardly conservative but score high on progressive metrics (HRC MEI, Infrastructure, Land Use/Conservation/Green Space, Diversity/Inclusion etc.).
I prefer liberal cities that allow for freedom of expression. I think people are more productive in places like that. But there again I don't want to be attacked by "planned parenthood" type of group either every time I walk down the street.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 04:06 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,615,377 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by STLgasm View Post
Milwaukee may be in the bluest state of the three, but St. Louis is the bluest city out of the three, by far.
Milwaukee had a Socialist mayor.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,681 posts, read 9,390,397 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjtinmemphis View Post
I prefer liberal cities that allow for freedom of expression. I think people are more productive in places like that. But there again I don't want to be attacked by "planned parenthood" type of group either every time I walk down the street.
Exactly.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2020, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Chicago- Hyde Park
4,079 posts, read 10,393,276 times
Reputation: 2658
Milwaukee for me.....
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-18-2020, 09:02 AM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,913,577 times
Reputation: 10080
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
Milwaukee had a Socialist mayor.
As recently as the 1950s, as well...

My vote is for Milwaukee, as it's in the state that does have a "blue " history of sorts ( WI is known as the Progressive State, although now it's close to being a 50/50 state)..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2020, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,681 posts, read 9,390,397 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
As recently as the 1950s, as well...

My vote is for Milwaukee, as it's in the state that does have a "blue " history of sorts ( WI is known as the Progressive State, although now it's close to being a 50/50 state)..
That is interesting to hear Milwaukee's blue history. I like how the Milwaukee county is choosing to help out residents on housing issues due to Covid-19.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...ty/5342994002/
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2020, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Greater Indianapolis
1,727 posts, read 2,006,772 times
Reputation: 1972
Voted for Cinci. Never been to Milwaukee so can't comment there. Been to St. Louis a few times and it was nice. Cinci has proximity to a number of other cities though (Louisville, Columbus, Indianapolis, etc.). I grew up in Ohio so maybe that makes me partial but I think the surrounding area of Cinci is very pretty. Rolling hills and you have the river front (ok, yes the other cities have a river/lake front as well). Plus I can't imagine the crime being worse than either Milwaukee or (especially) St. Louis
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top